What is a consideration for implementing wireless containment in response to unauthorized devices discovered by ArubaOS Wireless Intrusion Detection (WIP)?
Options:
A.
It is best practice to implement automatic containment of unauthorized devices to eliminate the need to locate and remove them.
B.
Wireless containment only works against unauthorized wireless devices that connect to your corporate LAN, so it does not offer protection against Interfering APs.
C.
Your company should consider legal implications before you enable automatic containment or implement manual containment.
D.
Because wireless containment has a lower risk of targeting legitimate neighbors than wired containment, it is recommended in most use cases.
When implementing wireless containment as a response to unauthorized devices, a company should consider the legal implications. Wireless containment might affect devices that are not part of the company's network and could be considered as a form of interference. This could have legal consequences, and therefore, such actions should be carefully reviewed and ideally should be performed in a targeted and controlled manner, reducing the risk of legal issues.
