HPE6-A78 Exam Dumps - HP Aruba-ACNSA Questions and Answers

A common method for hackers to perform a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack on a wireless network is by ARP poisoning. The attacker connects to the same network as the victim and sends false ARP messages over the network. This causes the victim's device to send traffic to the attacker's machine instead of the legitimate destination, allowing the attacker to intercept the traffic.

When an ArubaOS solution detects a rogue AP with Wireless Intrusion Prevention (WIP), the most crucial information that can help locate the rogue device is the detecting devices. This is because the detecting devices can provide the physical location or the network topology context where the rogue AP has been detected1.

The detecting devices are typically the Air Monitors (AMs) or Access Points (APs) in the network that have identified the rogue AP’s presence. These devices can provide information such as the signal strength and the direction from which the rogue AP’s signals are being received. By triangulating this information from multiple detecting devices, it becomes possible to pinpoint the physical location of the rogue AP2.

Additionally, the detecting devices can log events and alerts that can be reviewed to understand the rogue AP’s behavior, such as the channels it is operating on and the potential impact on the authorized wireless network1. This information is vital for network administrators to quickly and effectively respond to the threat posed by the rogue AP.

In contrast, the match method (A) and match type © relate to how the rogue AP is classified and identified by the system, which is useful for classification but not for physical location. The confidence level (D) indicates the system’s certainty in the classification but does not aid in locating the device2.

The ArubaOS firewall determines which rules to apply to a specific client's traffic based on the rules in policies associated with the client's user role. User roles are a fundamental part of ArubaOS and the firewall policies they encompass. These roles contain policies that dictate permissions and restrictions for network traffic. When a client authenticates, it is assigned a role, and the firewall enforces the rules defined within that role for the client's traffic.

References:

• ArubaOS firewall and user role configuration guides that explain the role-based access control and firewall policy enforcement.
• Industry best practices for network access control that advocate for role-based enforcement mechanisms.

In SNMPv3, security is paramount and each SNMP entity (client or agent) needs to have a user with a security name (username) and optionally, a security level which determines whether authentication and encryption are used. When configuring SNMPv3 users on network infrastructure devices, it is essential to match the username, authentication (auth) algorithm, authentication key (auth key), privacy (priv) algorithm, and privacy key (priv key) exactly as they are configured on the SNMP server to ensure successful communication.

This is because the SNMPv3 security model relies on a combination of a username and a pair of keys (authentication and privacy keys) to uniquely identify and secure communication between the agent and the manager. The keys are used to verify the integrity (auth key) and confidentiality (priv key) of the messages. Using the same algorithms ensures that the messages can be properly encrypted and decrypted on both ends.

Protected Management Frames (PMF), also known as Management Frame Protection (MFP), is designed to protect clients from denial-of-service (DoS) attacks that involve forged de-authentication and disassociation frames. These attacks can disconnect legitimate clients from the network. PMF provides a way to authenticate these management frames, ensuring that they are not forged, thus enhancing the security of the wireless network.

References:

• IEEE 802.11w amendment, which introduces PMF as a security enhancement to protect management frames.
• Wi-Fi Alliance security guidelines for Protected Management Frames (PMF).

To ensure that only management stations in the subnet 192.168.1.0/24 can access the ArubaOS-Switches' Command Line Interface (CLI), Web UI, and REST interfaces, while also allowing managers to access other parts of the network, you should specify 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 as the authorized manager IP address on the switches. This configuration will restrict access to the switch management interfaces to devices within the specified IP address range, effectively creating a management access list.

References:

• ArubaOS-Switch management and configuration guide detailing IP authorized manager settings.
• Network management best practices which recommend controlling access to network devices' management interfaces.

To configure the infrastructure to support network scans as part of the ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) solution, creating SNMPv3 users on ArubaOS-CX switches is necessary. Ensuring that the credentials for these SNMPv3 users match those configured on CPPM is crucial for enabling CPPM to perform network scans effectively. SNMPv3 provides a secure method for network management by offering authentication and encryption, which are essential for safely conducting scans that classify endpoints by type. This configuration allows CPPM to communicate securely with the switches and gather necessary data without compromising network security.

References:

• ArubaOS-CX configuration manuals that discuss SNMP settings.
• Network management and security guidelines that emphasize the importance of secure SNMP configurations for network scanning and monitoring.

To enable an ArubaOS Mobility Controller (MC) to accept Change of Authorization (CoA) messages from a RADIUS server for wireless sessions on a WLAN, part of the setup on the MC involves creating a dynamic authorization, or RFC 3576, server with the provided IP address (10.5.5.5) and the correct shared secret. This setup allows the MC to handle CoA requests, which are used to change the authorization attributes of a session after it has been authenticated, such as disconnecting a user or changing a user's VLAN assignment.

When responding to the detection of a Rogue AP, it's important to consider legal implications and to gather forensic evidence:

• You should receive permission before containing an AP (Option C), as containing it could disrupt service and may have legal implications, especially if the AP is on a network that the organization does not own.
• For forensic purposes, it is essential to document the event by copying out logs with relevant information, such as the time the AP was detected and the AP's MAC address (Option D). This information could be crucial if legal action is taken or if a detailed analysis of the security breach is required.

Automatically containing an AP without consideration for the context (Options A and E) can be problematic, as it might inadvertently interfere with neighboring networks and cause legal issues. Immediate containment without consideration of company policy (Option B) could also violate established incident response procedures.

References:

• Aruba Networks security resources that discuss the appropriate steps in responding to security events.
• Industry guidelines on responsible handling of rogue access point detections, including legal considerations and incident documentation.

The recommended approach for preventing users in the "user_group1" role from using gaming and peer-to-peer applications in an ArubaOS environment is to enable Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) and add application rules that specifically deny access to these types of applications for the role. DPI allows the network system to analyze the content of network traffic in real time and apply policies based on what it detects, including blocking specific applications like gaming and peer-to-peer sharing. This capability is essential for effectively managing application usage on the network and ensuring compliance with organizational policies. Application-specific rules provide precise control over the network traffic by identifying the application regardless of the network port used, making it a more effective method than blocking based on ports or IP addresses.