Isaca Certification CGEIT Release Date

According to the CGEIT exam content outline1, one of the subtopics under the domain of Risk Optimization is “Risk Ownership and Accountability”. This subtopic covers the process of assigning and communicating the roles and responsibilities for risk management to the appropriate stakeholders, such as business owners, process owners, or risk owners. Risk ownership is the best way to enable effective enterprise risk management (ERM), as it ensures that the risks are identified, assessed, treated, monitored, and reported by the people who have the authority, knowledge, and interest to manage them. Risk ownership also fosters a risk-aware culture and promotes accountability and transparency for risk management23.

The other options are not as effective as risk ownership to enable ERM. A risk register is a tool that records and tracks the information about the risks, such as their description, category, impact, likelihood, status, and action plan. A risk register is useful for documenting and communicating the risks, but it does not ensure that the risks are managed properly by the responsible parties4. A risk tolerance is a measure that defines the acceptable level of variation from the expected outcome or objective. A risk tolerance is important for setting the boundaries and criteria for risk management, but it does not guarantee that the risks are aligned with the business strategy and objectives5. A risk training is a program that provides education and awareness on risk management concepts, methods, and tools. A risk training is beneficial for enhancing the skills and competencies of the risk management staff and stakeholders, but it does not ensure that they perform their roles and responsibilities effectively6.

References: 1: CGEIT Exam Content Outline | ISACA1 2: Risk Ownership - ISACA2 3: Risk Ownership: The First Step in Enterprise Risk Management - ERM3 4: What Is a Risk Register? Explanation & Free Template - ProjectManager.com 5: What Is Risk Tolerance? Definition & Examples - Talend 6: IT Risk Management Training | ISACA

A periodic service provider audit is a process of conducting an independent and objective assessment of the service provider’s performance, quality, compliance, and security in relation to the agreed service level agreement (SLA) and the enterprise’s expectations and requirements. A periodic service provider audit can help provide quality of service oversight by:

• Verifying and validating the service provider’s claims and credentials, and ensuring that they meet the contractual obligations and standards
• Identifying and evaluating the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of the service provider’s services, processes, and controls
• Detecting and reporting any issues, gaps, or risks that may affect the quality of service delivery or the enterprise’s objectives and value
• Recommending and implementing corrective and preventive actions to address and resolve the issues, gaps, or risks
• Monitoring and measuring the outcomes and effectiveness of the corrective and preventive actions, and ensuring their alignment with the SLA

References:

• According to the CGEIT Review Manual 20221, “Service provider audits are a key mechanism for ensuring that service providers are meeting their contractual obligations and delivering value to the enterprise. Service provider audits should be conducted periodically or as needed to assess the performance, quality, compliance, and security of the service provider’s services, processes, and controls.”
• According to the ISACA article on IT Outsourcing: Audit Considerations2, “IT outsourcing audit is a process of examining and evaluating the IT outsourcing arrangements between an enterprise and its service providers. IT outsourcing audit aims to provide assurance that the IT outsourcing arrangements are aligned with the enterprise’s strategy, objectives, and risk appetite; that the service providers are delivering the expected services in accordance with the SLAs; that the service providers are complying with the applicable laws, regulations, and standards; and that the service providers are managing and mitigating the IT outsourcing risks effectively.”
• According to the PwC article on Service Provider Audits3, “Service provider audits are an essential tool for organizations to gain insight into their service providers’ operations, controls, risks, and compliance status. Service provider audits can help organizations ensure that their service providers are meeting their expectations and obligations; identify any areas of improvement or concern; enhance their relationship and communication with their service providers; and optimize their IT outsourcing strategy.”

The best approach to ensure global regulatory compliance when implementing a new business process is to ensure the appropriate involvement of the legal department. The legal department is the function that provides legal advice and guidance to the organization on various matters, such as contracts, transactions, disputes, regulations, and compliance. By involving the legal department in the implementation of a new business process, the organization can ensure that the business process complies with the relevant laws, policies, and standards that apply in different countries and jurisdictions. The legal department can also help to identify and mitigate any legal risks or issues that may arise from the new business process, such as liability, litigation, or sanctions.

The other options are not as effective as ensuring the appropriate involvement of the legal department for ensuring global regulatory compliance when implementing a new business process. Using a balanced scorecard to track the business process is a good practice for measuring and evaluating the performance and value of the business process, but it does not guarantee compliance with global regulations. Reviewing and revising the business architecture is a necessary step for designing and aligning the business process with the business strategy and objectives, but it does not address the legal aspects of the business process. Seeking approval from the change management board is a relevant procedure for implementing a new business process, but it does not ensure that the change management board has the expertise or authority to assess and approve the global regulatory compliance of the business process.

Performing stage-gate reviews throughout the life cycle of each project is the best way to ensure IT investment management processes are fully realizing the benefits identified in business cases. Stage-gate reviews provide structured checkpoints at critical phases of a project, allowing for the evaluation of progress, performance against objectives, and the continued viability and alignment with business goals. This approach enables timely adjustments to be made, ensuring that projects stay on track to deliver the expected benefits. While CIO review and approval, evaluating delegation of authority, and documenting lessons learned are valuable, they do not offer the continuous oversight and opportunity for course correction that stage-gate reviews do.