Newly Released Isaca CGEIT Exam PDF

A business impact analysis (BIA) report is the most valuable input when quantifying the loss associated with a major risk event. A BIA report is a document that identifies and evaluates the potential effects of disruptions to critical business functions and processes. A BIA report can help estimate the financial, operational, reputational, and legal impacts of a risk event, as well as the recovery time and resources needed to resume normal operations. A BIA report can also help prioritize the recovery strategies and objectives based on the criticality and urgency of the business functions and processes.

The other options are not the most valuable input when quantifying the loss associated with a major risk event. Key risk indicators (KRIs) are metrics that provide an early warning of potential threats to the organization’s objectives and performance. KRIs can help monitor and measure the risk exposure and effectiveness of risk management activities, but they do not directly quantify the loss associated with a risk event. IT environment threat modeling is a technique that identifies and analyzes the possible vulnerabilities and attack vectors in an IT system or network. Threat modeling can help improve the security and resilience of IT assets and services, but it does not directly quantify the loss associated with a risk event. Recovery time objectives (RTOs) are the maximum acceptable time frames for restoring business functions and processes after a disruption. RTOs can help determine the recovery priorities and strategies, but they do not directly quantify the loss associated with a risk event.

For more information on BIA and quantifying loss, you can refer to these web sources:

• What is Business Impact Analysis? Definition, Benefits & Examples
• Quantifying Loss Associated with Major Risk Event - Exam-Answer
• Quantifying the Qualitative Technology Risk Assessment - ISACA

To generate value for the enterprise, it is most important that IT investments are consistent with the enterprise’s business objectives. This means that IT investments should support and enable the achievement of the enterprise’s vision, mission, goals, and strategies. IT investments should also align with the enterprise’s values, culture, risk appetite, and stakeholder expectations. By ensuring that IT investments are consistent with the enterprise’s business objectives, the enterprise can maximize the benefits and value that IT can deliver, and avoid wasting resources on IT projects or initiatives that are not relevant, necessary, or effective. According to one source1, “Driving value creation with technology investments requires a clear understanding of how technology can enable business strategy and create value for the organization.” The other options are not the most important factor for generating value for the enterprise, but rather some of the steps or outcomes that can support or result from IT investments. Aligning IT investments with the IT strategic objectives is important, but not sufficient, as the IT strategic objectives should also be aligned with the enterprise’s business objectives. Approving IT investments by the CFO is a part of the financial governance process, but it does not guarantee that the IT investments are consistent with the enterprise’s business objectives. Including IT investments in the balanced scorecard is a way of measuring and reporting on the performance and value of IT investments, but it does not ensure that the IT investments are consistent with the enterprise’s business objectives. References := Driving value creation with technology investments

Information architecture (IA) is the process of guiding users through the site by organising and arranging all the relevant content in a clear, intuitive way. It also ensures consistency throughout a product’s design by standardising labelling conventions such as menu names, link titles, and button labels across all pages1. If enterprise IT has overseen the implementation of an array of data services with overlapping functionality, it may indicate that they have not followed a coherent and effective IA strategy. This can lead to business inefficiencies, such as duplication of efforts, confusion among users, and difficulty in finding and accessing information. According to one of the web search results2, “Application rationalization is a simple first step to analyze the current architecture to determine redundant applications, overlapping functionality, and software that is not exactly current. As more companies move into a service-oriented architecture implementation, this analysis is a cost-effective way to ensure that the IT resources are utilized in the most efficient manner.” Ineffective project management, an outdated service level agreement (SLA), and an incomplete cost-benefit analysis are not the most likely causes of this situation. They are more related to the planning, execution, and evaluation of individual projects, rather than the overall design and organisation of information systems. References := What is information architecture? - UX Design Institute, Staying Current And Supporting Systems With Overlapping Functionality

The first governance action for implementing a BYOD program should be to assess the BYOD risk. This is because BYOD introduces various security, legal, and operational risks to the enterprise, such as data loss or leakage, unauthorized access, malware infection, compliance violation, device management, and user privacy. Assessing the BYOD risk can help to identify and evaluate the potential threats, vulnerabilities, and impacts of allowing employees to use personal devices for email. Assessing the BYOD risk can also help to determine the appropriate controls and mitigation strategies to reduce the risk to an acceptable level.

Assessing the enterprise architecture (EA) is not the first governance action, as it is a subsequent step after assessing the BYOD risk. EA is a framework that defines the structure, components, relationships, and principles of the enterprise’s IT environment. Assessing the EA can help to ensure that the BYOD program aligns with the enterprise’s vision, strategy, goals, and standards. However, assessing the EA does not address the specific risks associated with BYOD.

Updating the network infrastructure is not the first governance action, as it is an implementation step after assessing the BYOD risk and EA. Updating the network infrastructure can help to enhance the performance, reliability, scalability, and security of the network that supports the BYOD program. However, updating the network infrastructure does not provide a comprehensive risk assessment or governance framework for BYOD.

Updating the BYOD policy is not the first governance action, as it is a result of assessing the BYOD risk and EA. A BYOD policy is a document that defines the rules, guidelines, and responsibilities for employees who use personal devices for email. Updating the BYOD policy can help to communicate the expectations and requirements for BYOD users and enforce compliance and accountability. However, updating the BYOD policy does not provide a thorough risk analysis or architectural alignment for BYOD.

References := BYOD Best Practices - JumpCloud, Assessing your needs section. End user device security for Bring-Your-Own-Device (BYOD) deployment models - ITSM.70.003 - Canadian Centre for Cyber Security, 1 Introduction section. BYOD Policy Best Practices: The Ultimate Checklist - Scalefusion, Introduction section. The Ultimate Guide to BYOD Security: Definition & More - Digital Guardian, The Challenges of BYOD Security section.