MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I Exam Dumps - Salesforce MuleSoft Questions and Answers

In Mule applications, different components are handled by specific thread pools to optimize performance and resource utilization.

• HTTP Listener: This component handles incoming HTTP requests and is managed by the Shared Selector Pool. The Shared Selector Pool is responsible for handling non-blocking IO operations efficiently.
• Logger: The Logger component is lightweight and does not perform CPU-intensive operations. It is managed by the CPU_LITE thread pool, which is designed for lightweight CPU operations.

This separation ensures that IO-bound operations do not block CPU-bound operations, maintaining optimal performance and responsiveness in the application.

References:

• MuleSoft Threading and Thread Pools
• MuleSoft HTTP Listener Documentation

=========================

Explanation

Correct answer is Mule correlation ID By design, Correlation Ids cannot be changed within a flow in Mule 4 applications and can be set only at source. This ID is part of the Event Context and is generated as soon as the message is received by the application. When a HTTP Request is received, the request is inspected for "X-Correlation-Id" header. If "X-Correlation-Id" header is present, HTTP connector uses this as the Correlation Id. If "X-Correlation-Id" header is NOT present, a Correlation Id is randomly generated. For Incoming HTTP Requests: In order to set a custom Correlation Id, the client invoking the HTTP request must set "X-Correlation-Id" header. This will ensure that the Mule Flow uses this Correlation Id. For Outgoing HTTP Requests: You can also propagate the existing Correlation Id to downstream APIs. By default, all outgoing HTTP Requests send "X-Correlation-Id" header. However, you can choose to set a different value to "X-Correlation-Id" header or set "Send Correlation Id" to NEVER.

To meet the requirements of enriching logging with more context and improving throughput while reducing latency, the customer should use an asynchronous logging approach. Here's why option B is correct:

• Async Logger: Asynchronous logging helps in improving the performance by decoupling the logging from the main thread of execution. This reduces the latency of message processing since logging operations are offloaded to a separate thread.
• Logging Level Greater than INFO: Logging at levels such as WARN, ERROR, or FATAL ensures that only essential logs are written asynchronously, further enhancing performance. Avoiding DEBUG or TRACE levels unless necessary reduces the overhead of logging.
• Pattern Layout with [%MDC]: Using the pattern layout with [%MDC] in the log4j2.xml configuration file allows the inclusion of mapped diagnostic context in the logs. MDC is a feature that provides context-specific information, such as transaction IDs or user IDs, which helps in tracing and debugging.

Example configuration in log4j2.xml:

This configuration ensures that the logs are enriched with context information provided by MDC and processed asynchronously to maintain high throughput and low latency.

References

• Log4j2 Asynchronous Logging
• Mapped Diagnostic Context (MDC) in Log4j2

MuleSoft customers often favor a MuleSoft-hosted Anypoint Platform runtime plane over a customer-hosted runtime for the following reasons:

• Reduced time-to-market for the first application (C): Using a MuleSoft-hosted runtime plane accelerates the deployment process because MuleSoft manages the infrastructure, allowing customers to focus on developing and deploying their applications quickly. This leads to faster time-to-market for the initial application and subsequent updates.
• Reduced IT operations effort (E): By leveraging a MuleSoft-hosted environment, customers offload the operational responsibilities, such as infrastructure maintenance, updates, and scalability management, to MuleSoft. This reduces the IT operations workload and allows internal teams to focus on more strategic initiatives.

In contrast, other options like reduced application latency and increased application throughput are not directly influenced by whether the runtime plane is MuleSoft-hosted or customer-hosted.

References

• MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Documentation
• MuleSoft Hosted vs. Customer Hosted Deployment Guides