MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I Exam Dumps - Salesforce MuleSoft Questions and Answers

Explanation

● Option A says "Perform EACH DB insert in a SEPARATE DB transaction". In this case if first DB insert is successful and second one fails then first insert won't be rolled back causing inconsistency. This option is ruled out.

● Option D says Perform BOTH DB inserts in ONE DB transaction.

Rule of thumb is when one or more DB connections are required we must use XA transaction as local transactions support only one resource. So this option is also ruled out.

● Option B acknowledges the before DB processing, so message is removed from the queue. In case of system failure at later point, message can't be retrieved.

● Option C is Valid: Though it says "do not ack JMS message", message will be auto acknowledged at the end of transaction. Here is how we can ensure all components are part of XA transaction: https://docs.mulesoft.com/jms-connector/1.7/jms-transactions

Additional Information about transactions:

● XA Transactions - You can use an XA transaction to group together a series of operations from multiple transactional resources, such as JMS, VM or JDBC resources, into a single, very reliable, global transaction.

● The XA (eXtended Architecture) standard is an X/Open group standard which specifies the interface between a global transaction manager and local transactional resource managers.

The XA protocol defines a 2-phase commit protocol which can be used to more reliably coordinate and sequence a series of "all or nothing" operations across multiple servers, even servers of different types

● Use JMS ack if

– Acknowledgment should occur eventually, perhaps asynchronously

– The performance of the message receipt is paramount

– The message processing is idempotent

– For the choreography portion of the SAGA pattern

● Use JMS transactions

– For all other times in the integration you want to perform an atomic unit of work

– When the unit of work comprises more than the receipt of a single message

– To simply and unify the programming model (begin/commit/rollback)

To efficiently handle the invocation of vendor applications and retry requests that generate timeout errors, the most performant way is:

• Scatter-Gather Scope: Use a Scatter-Gather scope to invoke each vendor application in parallel. This approach allows the API to send requests to both vendors simultaneously, reducing overall processing time.
• Until-Successful Scope: Inside each route of the Scatter-Gather scope, use an Until-Successful scope to handle retries. The Until-Successful scope will retry the request in case of timeout errors until the request succeeds or the maximum retry limit is reached.

This combination ensures that the API can handle intermittent network issues efficiently while minimizing redundant transactions and maximizing performance.

References

• MuleSoft Documentation on Scatter-Gather Scope
• MuleSoft Documentation on Until-Successful Scope and Error Handling

When configuring secure communication with an FTPS server and handling signed files, the necessary components include:

• FTPS Server Login Credentials: The username and password used to authenticate with the company's FTPS server.
• TLS Context Trust Store: This should contain the public certificate for the FTPS server (ftps.partner.com) to establish a secure SSL/TLS connection.
• Partner's PGP Public Key: This is used to verify the signature of the files received from the partner, ensuring data integrity and authenticity.

These components collectively ensure secure communication and data validation.

References

• MuleSoft Documentation on FTPS and PGP Encryption
• Best Practices for Secure File Transfer and Encryption

Explanation

* If you need to scale a JMS provider/ message broker, - add nodes to scale it horizontally or - add memory to scale it vertically * Cons of adding another JMS provider/ message broker: - adds cost. - adds complexity to use two JMS brokers - adds Operational overhead if we use two brokers, say, ActiveMQ and IBM MQ * So Two options that mention to use two brokers are not best choice. * It's mentioned that "The Fulfillment microservice consumes Order messages, fulfills the order described therein, and then publishes an OrderFulfilled message. Each OrderFulfilled message can be consumed by any interested Mule application." - When you publish a message on a topic, it goes to all the subscribers who are interested - so zero to many subscribers will receive a copy of the message. - When you send a message on a queue, it will be received by exactly one consumer. * As we need multiple consumers to consume the message below option is not valid choice: "Order messages are sent to an Anypoint MQ exchange. OrderFulfilled messages are sent to an Anypoint MQ queue. Both microservices interact with Anypoint MQ as the message broker, which must therefore scale to support the load of both microservices" * Order messages are only consumed by one Mule application, the Fulfillment microservice, so we will publish it on queue and OrderFulfilled message can be consumed by any interested Mule application so it need to be published on Topic using same broker. * Correct Answer: Best choice in this scenario is: "Order messages are sent to a JMS queue. OrderFulfilled messages are sent to a JMS topic. Both microservices interact with the same JMS provider (message broker) instance, which must therefore scale to support the load of both microservices" Tried to depict scenario in diagram:

Diagram Description automatically generated

The advantage of using OAuth 2.0 client credentials and access tokens over only API keys for API authentication is that if the access token is compromised, the client credentials do not have to be reissued.

OAuth 2.0 is a secure protocol for authenticating clients and authorizing them to access protected resources. It works by having the client authenticate with the authorization server and receive an access token, which is then used to authenticate requests to the API. If the access token is compromised, it can be revoked and replaced without needing to reissue the client credentials.

References: MuleSoft Certified Integration Architect - Level 1 Official Text Book and Resources:

• Chapter 7: Security
• Section 7.2: OAuth 2.0

According to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), a hybrid cloud is a cloud computing deployment model that describes a composition of two or more distinct cloud infrastructures (private, community, or public) that remain unique entities but are bound together by standardized or proprietary technology that enables data and application portability. Hybrid clouds allow organizations to leverage the advantages of multiple cloud environments, such as combining the scalability and cost-efficiency of public clouds with the security and control of private clouds. This model facilitates flexibility and dynamic scalability, supporting diverse workloads and business needs while ensuring that sensitive data and applications can remain in a controlled private environment.

References

• NIST Definition of Cloud Computing
• Hybrid Cloud Overview and Benefits

Explanation

Every Mule application deployed to CloudHub receives a DNS entry pointing to the CloudHub. The DNS entry is a CNAME for the CloudHub Shared Load Balancer in the region to which the Mule application is deployed. When we deploy the application on CloudHub, we get a generic url to access the endpoints. Generic URL looks as below:

..cloudhub.io is the deployed application name which is unique across all the MuleSoft clients. is the region name in which an application is deployed.

The public CloudHub (shared) load balancer already redirects these requests, where myApp is the name of the Mule application deployment to CloudHub: HTTP requests to http://myApp. .cloudhub.io redirects to

http://mule-worker-myApp. .cloudhub.io:8081

HTTPS traffic to https://myApp. .cloudhub.io redirects to

https://mule-worker-myApp. .cloudhub.io:8082

Explanation

Correct answer is Untill Successful scope can be implemented while calling backend API's The Until Successful scope repeatedly triggers the scope's components (including flow references) until they all succeed or until a maximum number of retries is exceeded The scope provides option to control the max number of retries and the interval between retries The scope can execute any sequence of processors that may fail for whatever reason and may succeed upon retry

In a clustered Mule runtime environment, when using a JMS listener to consume messages from a queue destination, it is essential to ensure that messages are appropriately received by all nodes in the cluster. The configuration must support high availability and scalability. Here's why option B is correct:

• primaryNodeOnly="false": Setting this parameter to "false" ensures that the JMS listener is active on all nodes in the cluster, not just the primary node. This setting allows multiple instances of the JMS listener to run concurrently across different nodes, enabling them to consume messages from the JMS queue.
• Shared Subscription: Using a shared subscription means that all nodes will share the consumption of messages from the queue. This approach prevents duplicate message processing, as each message is delivered to only one listener instance within the cluster. This configuration ensures that message processing is balanced across the nodes, improving throughput and reliability.

To configure the JMS listener in Mule, the XML configuration might look something like this:

xml

This setup ensures that all nodes in the cluster are involved in message processing, leveraging the high availability and load balancing capabilities of the cluster.

References

• MuleSoft Documentation on JMS Listener
• MuleSoft Clustering Guide

In a microservices architecture, a service mesh manages the communication between microservices. This involves handling service discovery, load balancing, failure recovery, metrics, and monitoring. Service meshes also provide more complex operational requirements like A/B testing, canary releases, rate limiting, access control, and end-to-end authentication. By abstracting these functionalities away from individual microservices, a service mesh allows developers to focus on business logic while ensuring reliable and secure inter-service communication.

References:

• Understanding Service Mesh
• Service Mesh for Microservices