L4M2 Exam Dumps - CIPS Level 4 Diploma in Procurement and Supply Questions and Answers

Explanation

Competitive benchmarking

Competitive benchmarking is a direct competitor-to-competitor comparison of a product, service, process, or method. This form of benchmarking provides an opportunity to know yourself and your competition better; combine forces against another common competitor. An example of competitive benchmarking within the Department of Defense, might include contrasting Army and Air Force supply systems for Joint initiatives. Within the private sector, two or more American car companies might benchmark for mutual benefit against common international competitor; or, rival chemical companies benchmark for environmental compliance.

Benefits

- Comparing like processes

- Know your competition better

- Possible partnership

- Useful for planning and setting goals

- Similar regulatory issues

Challenges

- Difficult legal issues

- Relatively low performance improvement

- Threatening

- Limited by trade secrets

- May provide misleading information

- May not get best-in-class comparisons

- Competitors could capitalize on your weaknesses

Source: USN Benchmarking Handbook

Explanation

According to US Department of the Navy, Benchmarking is a strategic and analytic process of continuously measuring an organisation's products, services, and practices against a recognised leader in the studied area.

Successful benchmarking will help you:

- Find who does the process best and close the gap

- Recognise the leading organisations in a process or activity

- Create performance standards derived from an analysis of the best in business

- Ensure that comparisons are relevant

- Measure your performance, your processes, and your strategies against best in business

- Measure business processes

- Assess performance over time

- Accelerate continuous process improvement (CPI)

- Establish more credible goals for CPI

- Establish actionable objectives

- Discover and clarify new goals

- Establish customer expectations of business standards set by the best suppliers in industry

- Help your organisation achieve breakthrough improvements

- Create a sense of urgency for change

- Increase customer satisfaction

- Become direction setting

- Provide a positive, proactive structured process

Benchmarking does not:

- Copy the other's processes

- Steal other business confidentiality

- Stop. Benchmarking is a continuous process.

Detailed Explanation:Analyzing both direct and indirect costs helps buyers understand cost structures and negotiate effectively. Indirect costs, like overheads, can be identified through supplier data and market benchmarks, aiding in cost transparency. Reference: CIPS Level 4, Cost Management and Negotiation.

Explanation

Through-life management is a approach applied to capital asset. According to Ward and Graves, Through-life Management involves the life-cycle management of the products, services and activities required to deliver a fully integrated capability to the customer, while reducing the cost of ownership for the customer. According to CIPS study guide, through-life management comprises of 6 parts:

1. Design

2. Manufacture

3. Installation

4. In-service support

5. Decommission and disposal

6. Customer support

In this scenario, the company is planning to procure a ship, which is a capital asset. Through life management is a good approach. Sealines can start with developing through-life specification. This approach may have several benefits:

- It lowers the costs over the whole life of the asset

- It lowers the risks as there is a single company accountable for costs and service over the life of the asset

- A closer match between the asset delivered and the users' needs

- Development of capability over the life of the asset as the supplier continues to get experience of the users' needs and can adapt services to meet them.

Explanation

Basically, IKEA project team is undertaking the following process:

A picture containing text, businesscard Description automatically generated

This is a typical benchmarking process. Benchmarking is defined as the process of measuring products, services, and processes against those of organizations known to be leaders in one or more aspects of their operations. Benchmarking provides necessary insights to help you understand how your organization compares with similar organizations, even if they are in a different business or have a different group of customers.

In the scenario, benchmarking process is undertaken within subsidiaries of IKEA, thus it is internal.

Explanation

Kano model of excitement and basic quality (Kano et al, 1984; Berger et al, 1993; Matzler et al, 1996) brings a different perspective for the analysis of improvement opportunities in products and services because it takes in consideration the asymmetrical and non-linear relationship between performance and satisfaction. The Kano model classifies customers requirements in three categories (figure 3):

a) Basic Requirements (or Must-be requirement). The basic requirements fulfill the basic func-tions of a product. If they are not present or their performance is insufficient, customers will be extremely dissatisfied. On the other hand, if they are present or have sufficient performance, they don't bring satisfaction. Customers see them as prerequisites. For instance, for luxury automobiles, "air bags" are considered basic. A customer won't feel satisfied if the automobile has "air bag", however he/she will not buy it if “air bag” is not present.

b) Performance Requirements (or One-dimensional requirements). As for these requirements, satisfaction is proportional to the performance level – the higher the performance, the higher the customer's satisfaction will be and vice-versa. Gas consumption in automobiles is an example of these requirements. Usually customers explicitly demand performance requirements.

c) Excitement Requirements (or Attractive requirements). These requirements are key to cus-tomer satisfaction. If they are present or have sufficient performance, they will bring superior satisfaction. On the other hand, if they are not present or their performance is insufficient, customers will not get dissatisfied. For instance, a surprise gift at the end of a dinner in a restaurant will certainly bring satisfaction, but it will not cause dissatisfaction if not offered. These requirements are not demanded nor expected by customers.

Two other types of requirements may be identified in the Kano model: neutral and reverse ones. Neutral requirements do not bring either satisfaction or dissatisfaction. Reverse require-ments bring more satisfaction if absent than if present.

Diagram Description automatically generated

Explanation

Value engineering is often applied to new products or services. Early supplier involvement (ESI) is the involvement of a supplier in the product development process from a very stage in order to use the supplier's experience and expertise. ESI can bring cost reduction opportunities, process improvements, supply chain improvements and reduce supply risk. Both processes focus on development of new product or service. They tend to work the best if they are used together.

LO 3, AC 3.1 & AC 3.4