Salesforce Developer Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect Exam Questions and Answers PDF

 The two actions that can effectively contribute to the quality and agility of the team are: Define and follow code standards, and use static code analysis tool in the pipeline before manual code review. Code standards can help ensure consistency, readability, and maintainability of the code, as well as reduce errors and bugs. A static code analysis tool can help automate the code review process and identify any issues or violations of the code standards before the manual review. Choosing the most senior developer to help the technical lead or skipping the code review are not effective actions, as they can lead to more errors and delays.

 Using a Change Set or manually replicating the changes in the developer sandbox are both valid approaches to ensure that changes made in production are reflected in the sandbox that the developers are working on. Refreshing the developer sandbox would overwrite any changes made by the developers, and Salesforce-to-Salesforce is not a deployment tool.

The best deployment tool for UC to use to manage their deployment process in an automated fashion is the Force.com Migration Tool, as it is a command-line tool that uses the Metadata API to deploy components from one org to another, and can be integrated with version control systems and continuous integration servers. Option A is not a good choice, as Workbench is a web-based tool that does not support automation or scripting. Option C is not a good choice, as Change Sets are a point-and-click tool that require manual steps to create and deploy. Option D is not a good choice, as Force.com IDE is a desktop tool that does not support automation or scripting.

 Testers will experience functional changes throughout testing due to not having isolation from development. Using a single developer sandbox for both development and testing is not a good practice, as it does not provide a stable and consistent environment for testing. The developers may make changes to the code or configuration that affect the functionality or behavior of the application, which may cause the testers to encounter unexpected results or errors.