Full Access Oracle 1z0-1075-24 Tutorials

When implementing the functionality for checkingQualified Operatorsduring labor usage reporting in Oracle Manufacturing Cloud, it is important to enforce validation for operator qualifications. The following explains why statement C isnot true:

Quick Complete is not allowedfor operations that have resources with associated job profiles. This is because operations with specific job profile requirements must go through a more detailed validation process to ensure that the assigned operator has the necessary qualifications before the operation can be completed. Quick Complete bypasses detailed validations, making it unsuitable for operations with strict qualification checks.

Correct statements:

Statement A: Operator qualification is enforced when reporting operation completion through the dispatch list to ensure compliance.

Statement B: A qualified operator is required to manually report resource transactions when the resource has an associated job profile.

Statement D: Labor for qualified operators must be reported at the resource train stop to ensure the resource's qualifications are properly validated before continuing with the operation.

In Oracle Manufacturing Cloud, when defining a standard operation such as visual inspection, marking it as aCount Pointensures that its completion will be tracked and reported for all work orders referencing it. ACount Pointoperation is one where progress must be explicitly recorded, allowing visibility into work order completion.

Selecting the Count Point check boxensures that this operation becomes a mandatory checkpoint where users must report completion in all related work orders. This is essential for operations like visual inspection, where reporting completion is critical to production quality.

Overriding the plant production calendar with date-effective work center calendars provides flexibility in scheduling specific work centers with different operating hours. However, certain aspects of production planning and execution remain tied to the plant-level calendar. Here are the details:

Statement A:The Work Execution Work Area Infolets and Manage Production Exceptions page are based on the plant calendar and not on work center calendars– Even when work centers have their own calendars, the high-level overview and exception reporting remain based on the plant calendar.

Statement C:Lead time calculation in days for an item remains based on the plant calendar– Lead times are calculated using the plant calendar, regardless of work center-specific calendars, ensuring consistency in planning.

Statement D:Search actions in the Review Dispatch List page query operations based on the plant calendar shifts when multiple work centers are selected– For consistency in dispatching, the system references the plant calendar when shift-based search parameters are used across multiple work centers.

Incorrect Statements:

Statement B: Date-effective ranges for work center calendars should not overlap for accuracy in scheduling.

Statement E: Supplier operations in outside processing generally rely on the plant calendar for consistency unless explicitly configured otherwise.

When enabling audit trail functionality to ensure compliance with the US Code of Federal Regulations (21 CFR Part 11), certain actions related to work definitions and standard operations are audited for changes such as creation, update, and deletion. However, not all aspects are tracked in the audit trail.

Item structure component attributes referenced from Product Information Management (PIM)are not included in the audit trail. PIM attributes are managed separately from manufacturing-specific data, and changes to these components are not captured in the standard operations audit trail.

Audited components typically include:

Work definition header and version attributes

Descriptive flexfields (DFFs) at any level

Attachments at any level

Operation resources, including alternate resources