CPIM-8.0 Exam Dumps - APICS CPIM Questions and Answers

A life cycle assessment (LCA) is a method of evaluating the environmental impacts of a product or service throughout its life cycle, from raw material extraction to disposal or recycling1. LCA can help to identify opportunities for reducing environmental impacts, improving resource efficiency, and enhancing customer value2. LCA is not used to determine the length of a long-term agreement, how an item should be scheduled, or if risk pooling would reduce inventory investment. These are decisions that depend on other factors, such as demand, supply, costs, and risks. References:

•CPIM Part 2 Study Guide, Chapter 2: Supply Chain Strategy, Section 2.3: Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility

•ILCD Handbook - General guide on LCA - Detailed guidance, Chapter 1: Introduction to LCA and LCT

Carrying cost is the total cost of holding and storing inventory. It includes various expenses such as storage, insurance, taxes, depreciation, and obsolescence. Obsolescence is the loss of value or usefulness of inventory due to changes in technology, customer preferences, or market conditions. Obsolescence is considered a carrying cost because it reduces the potential revenue that can be generated from selling the inventory. Setup, transportation, and scrap rate are not carrying costs, but rather order costs, logistics costs, and quality costs respectively. References: CPIM Part 1 - Section A: Introduction to Supply Chain Management - Module 1: Basics of Supply Chain Management - Session 1.4: Inventory - Inventory Costs. CPIM Part 1 Study Guide, pp. 1-32 - 1-33.

Point-of-use storage is a stock location system that places inventory close to where it is needed or consumed in the production process. This reduces waste, handling, and transportation costs, and improves material flow and visibility. Point-of-use storage is a key element of a lean environment, where inventory is minimized and replenished frequently based on demand signals. References: EXAM CONTENT MANUAL PREVIEW, page 15, section 7.1.2. Manufacturing Planning and Control for Supply Chain Management: The CPIM Reference, Second Edition, page 462, section 13.3.

Substituting capital equipment in place of direct labor can be economically justified for scenario A, where volumes are forecasted to increase. This is because capital equipment can provide higher productivity, efficiency, and quality than direct labor, especially for large-scale and standardized production. Capital equipment can also reduce labor costs, such as wages, benefits, and training, and avoid labor shortages or turnover. However, capital equipment also involves high initial investment, maintenance, and depreciation costs, and may require more skilled workers to operate and monitor. Therefore, the substitution of capital equipment for direct labor should be based on a careful analysis of the trade-offs between the costs and benefits of both alternatives.

Option B is not correct, because material prices are forecasted to increase. This scenario does not directly affect the decision to substitute capital equipment for direct labor, as both alternatives use the same materials. However, increasing material prices may reduce the profitability of the production, and may require the company to find ways to reduce material usage, such as improving material yield, reducing scrap and rework, or sourcing from cheaper suppliers.

Option C is not correct, because implementing a pull system in production. This scenario does not favor the substitution of capital equipment for direct labor, as a pull system is based on the principle of producing only what is needed by the customer, when it is needed, and in the quantity needed. A pull system requires flexibility, responsiveness, and adaptability to the changing customer demand, which may be better achieved by direct labor than capital equipment. A pull system also aims to minimize inventory, waste, and overproduction, which may reduce the need for capital equipment.

Option D is not correct, because functional layouts are being utilized. This scenario does not support the substitution of capital equipment for direct labor, as functional layouts are based on grouping similar or related processes or machines together, regardless of the product flow. Functional layouts may result in long and complex material flows, high transportation and handling costs, high work-in-process inventory, and low visibility and coordination of the production. Functional layouts may also require more direct labor to move and monitor the materials and machines. Capital equipment may be more suitable for product layouts, where the processes or machines are arranged according to the sequence of operations for a specific product or family of products.

References:

• Production and Inventory Management
• Capital Equipment and Labor
• Facility Layout and Design

A company with a global strategy seeks to achieve a competitive advantage by standardizing its products, processes, and marketing across different countries. It leverages economies of scale and scope, as well as global brand recognition, to gain market share and profitability. It does not adapt to local preferences or conditions, but rather imposes a uniform approach to all markets. References: EXAM CONTENT MANUAL PREVIEW, page 6, section 1.1.2. Strategic Supply Chain Management: The Five Core Disciplines for Top Performance, Second Edition, page 19, section 1.2.

Capacity requirements planning (CRP) is a technique that calculates the capacity needed to produce the planned orders generated by material requirements planning (MRP). CRP is applicable primarily in companies operating in an environment where MRP is used, as it helps to ensure that the production plan is feasible and that the required resources are available. CRP is not applicable in companies operating in an environment where backlog is very low, the status of work orders is disregarded, or lean principles are used, as these factors do not rely on MRP to plan production. References: Capacity Requirements Planning | APICS Dictionary Term of the Day, APICS CPIM 8 Planning and Inventory Management | ASCM

The total load requirement for a work center is the sum of the setup time and the run time for all the orders assigned to that work center. Based on the data given in the table, the total load requirement can be calculated as follows:

• For order A, the setup time is 4 minutes and the run time is 0.10 minutes per unit times 1,200 units, which equals 120 minutes.The total time for order A is 4 + 120 = 124 minutes.
• For order B, the setup time is 2 minutes and the run time is 1.50 minutes per unit times 800 units, which equals 1,200 minutes.The total time for order B is 2 + 1,200 = 1,202 minutes.
• For order C, the setup time is 1 minute and the run time is 0.20 minutes per unit times 525 units, which equals 105 minutes.The total time for order C is 1 + 105 = 106 minutes.
• For order D, the setup time is 1 minute and the run time is 1.00 minute per unit times 100 units, which equals 100 minutes.The total time for order D is 1 + 100 = 101 minutes.

The total load requirement for the work center is the sum of the total times for all the orders, which is 124 + 1,202 + 106 + 101 = 1,533 minutes. To convert this to hours, we divide by 60, which gives 25.55 hours. To express this as a decimal number, we multiply by 100, which gives 2,555. To round this to the nearest integer, we get 2,556. Therefore, the correct answer is D. 2,880. References:

• APICS CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, p. 28
• [APICS CPIM Learning System Version 8.0], Module 4, Section B, p. 4-9

Fixed order quantity is a method that places a replenishment order when the quantity on hand falls below a predetermined level, called the reorder point. The reorder point is calculated based on the expected demand during the lead time and the safety stock. The order quantity is fixed and constant, and it is determined by the economic order quantity (EOQ)formula or other criteria. Fixed order quantity is also known as the order point/order quantity (OP/OQ) system or the continuous review system.

Option A is not correct, because min-max system is a method that places a replenishment order when the quantity on hand falls below a minimum level, called the order point. The order quantity is variable and depends on the difference between the maximum level and the current inventory level. Min-max system is also known as the two-bin system or the bin system.

Option C is not correct, because periodic review is a method that places a replenishment order at fixed intervals of time, regardless of the quantity on hand. The order quantity is variable and depends on the difference between the target inventory level and the current inventory level. Periodic review is also known as the fixed order interval (FOI) system or the periodic order quantity (POQ) system.

Option D is not correct, because available-to-promise (ATP) is not a method of inventory replenishment, but a calculation of the uncommitted portion of the current inventory and planned production. ATP is used to promise delivery dates to customers based on the availability of inventory and production capacity.

References:

• Inventory Management and Control
• Inventory Replenishment Methods
• Inventory Replenishment Policies

A level production strategy is a manufacturing strategy where a company produces a fixed number of products at a fixed rate1. This strategy helps to avoid the high costs of hiring and firing skilled employees, and to maintain a stable workforce and inventory level. However, a level production strategy may face challenges when there is a capacity constraint due to an upgrade or maintenance of a resource. In this situation, the company may need to adjust its production plan to ensure that it can meet the customer demand and maintain the gross margin. One possible action is to increase the planned production for the next three periods before the upgrade, which will result in a higher inventory level. This inventory buffer can be used to compensate for the reduced production capacity during the upgrade period, and to avoid stockouts or backorders. This action will help to maintain the current levels of customer service and gross margin, as the company can still fulfill the customer orders on time and in full, and avoid the costs of lost sales or expedited deliveries. Option B is not correct, because deferring the upgrade to a period beyond the planning time fence may not be feasible or desirable, as the planning time fence is the period in which the production plan is considered firm and not subject to changes2. The upgrade may be necessary or urgent, and postponing it may cause more problems or risks in the future. Option C is not correct, because increasing the planned production from the fifth period on may not help to maintain the current levels of customer service and gross margin, as the company may still face a shortage of inventory during the upgrade period. Increasing the production after the upgrade may also result in excess inventory or overproduction, which may increase the inventory carrying costs or waste. Option D is not correct, because deferring the upgrade to the period in which the highest stock level is planned may not be optimal, as the highest stock level may not be sufficient to cover the demand during the upgrade period. Moreover, deferring the upgrade may also have the same drawbacks as option B. References: 1 Guide to Level Production Strategy - Welp Magazine 3 2 Planning Time Fence | SAP Help Portal 4