COBIT-2019 Exam Dumps - Isaca Certification Questions and Answers

 The responsible ® role fulfills the practice and creates the intended outcome within an organizational structure chart (RACI chart). A RACI chart is a tool that assigns different levels of responsibility, accountability, consultation, and information to roles and organizational structures for each governance and management objective. The responsible ® role means performing or overseeing a task or process. There can be more than one responsible role for each task or process, but they must be coordinated by the accountable role. The responsible role fulfills the practice and creates the intended outcome by executing or supervising the process activities.13 References: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, COBIT 2019 Framework: Roles, Responsibilities & RACI Charts

 As explained in the previous question, the success metrics for the EGIT continual improvement program are identified and defined in the third stage of the EGIT implementation life cycle, which is developing the EGIT implementation program plan. Therefore, the correct answer is D. The other options are incorrect because they refer to different stages of the EGIT implementation life cycle that do not involve defining the success metrics. Option A refers to the second stage, which is defining the EGIT implementation road map. This stage involves identifying and prioritizing the improvement opportunities based on a gap analysis between the current and desired states of EGIT. Option B refers to the fourth stage, which is executing the EGIT implementation program plan. This stage involves implementing the improvement actions according to the plan, monitoring and controlling the progress and outcomes, and reporting on the results. Option C refers to the first stage, which is initiating an EGIT program. This stage involves establishing a clear vision and scope for the EGIT program, obtaining senior management commitment and sponsorship, and setting up a governance structure for the program. References: : COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information & Technology Governance Solution, page 28 1 : COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information & Technology Governance Solution, page 43 1 : COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information & Technology Governance Solution, page 24 

The internal audit function is an independent and objective assurance and consulting activity that evaluates and improves the effectiveness of governance, risk management, and control processes in an enterprise. The internal audit function has a role in defining the EGIT target state, which is the desired state of information and technology governance in an enterprise that is aligned with its strategy, objectives, and stakeholder needs. The role of the internal audit function in this process is to provide advice and assist with target-state positioning and gap priorities. This means that the internal audit function can help to identify the current state of information and technology governance in an enterprise, assess the gaps and issues that need to be addressed, determine the target state of information and technology governance that is optimal for the enterprise, and prioritize the actions and initiatives that are required to achieve the target state. The internal audit function can also provide assurance on the design and implementation of the EGIT target state by evaluating its adequacy, effectiveness, efficiency, and compliance.References: : COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, page 51-52 : COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, page 30-31

 A principle associated with the key components of a governance framework is that key components should function independently to maintain integrity. Key components include governance components (such as structures, processes, principles, policies, etc.), governance enablers (such as people, skills, culture, information, services, etc.), and governance outcomes (such as value creation, risk optimization, resource optimization, etc.). These components should operate independently from each other to avoid conflicts of interest, bias, or undue influence. They should also have clear roles, responsibilities, authorities, and accountabilities. COBIT ensures the independence of key components by defining their relationships and interactions in a transparent and consistent manner.14 References: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance System

An example of a governance system component is the compliance regulations applicable to the enterprise. The governance system components are the elements that constitute a governance system for an enterprise using COBIT 2019. The governance system components include principles enablers goals processes practices roles structures metrics etc., that enable an enterprise to govern and manage its information and technology activities effectively efficiently reliably securely etc. The compliance regulations are the laws regulations standards guidelines contracts or agreements that govern the information and technology activities of an enterprise. The compliance regulations influence the level of control and assurance that an enterprise needs to demonstrate its adherence to the applicable rules and obligations. By considering the compliance regulations as a governance system component an enterprise can ensure that its governance system is appropriate for its context and objectives that it can effectively manage the potential impacts of non-compliance on its reputation performance value stakeholder trust etc., that it can align its information and technology activities with the relevant standards guidelines regulations best practices etc., that it can meet stakeholder requirements expectations etc., 5 References: 5: COBIT 2019 Design Guide: page 47-48 : COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance System Components: page 27-28

The management objective that would be given higher priority in an enterprise’s governance system when the enterprise is very risk-averse is managed portfolio. This objective relates to ensuring that IT-enabled investments are aligned with the enterprise’s risk appetite and tolerance levels, and that they deliver optimal value and benefits. This objective also involves managing the portfolio of IT-enabled investments throughout their life cycle, from initiation to retirement. The objective is based on the COBIT 2019 Design Guide3, page 71. References: 3: COBIT 2019 Design Guide | Digital | English

An important component for an enterprise strategy archetype of cost leadership as defined by COBIT 2019 is support for the portfolio management role with an investment office. According to the COBIT 2019 Design Guide, cost leadership is one of the four generic enterprise strategy archetypes that describe how enterprises compete in their markets. Cost leadership means that an enterprise aims to offer the lowest prices for its products or services by minimizing its costs and maximizing its efficiency. One of the design factors that influence the governance system for a cost leadership strategy is the organizational structures. The COBIT 2019 Design Guide suggests that a cost leadership strategy requires a centralized and standardized organizational structure that supports the portfolio management role with an investment office. The portfolio management role is responsible for selecting, prioritizing, and balancing the IT investments that align with the enterprise strategy and objectives. The investment office is a function that assists the portfolio management role by providing financial analysis, reporting, and decision support. The support for the portfolio management role with an investment office helps to ensure that the IT investments are optimized for cost and value. References: : COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information & Technology Governance Solution, page 48 2 : COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information & Technology Governance Solution, page 51 

 Business service continuity and availability is one of the 17 enterprise goals defined in COBIT 2019, which describe the outcomes that an enterprise wants to achieve from its use of information and technology. This goal relates to ensuring that critical business processes and information are available at a level acceptable to the enterprise in the event of a disruption or disaster, and that recovery plans are in place to restore normal operations as soon as possible. The goal is based on the COBIT 2019 Framework3, page 36. References: 3: COBIT 2019 Framework | Digital | English

The capability levels are a measure of how well an enterprise performs its information and technology governance and management processes in terms of process attributes such as process performance, process definition, process deployment, process measurement, process control, process optimization etc. The capability levels range from 0 (incomplete) to 5 (optimizing), indicating the degree of maturity and effectiveness of an enterprise’s information and technology governance and management processes. The targeted capability levels are the desired levels of performance that an enterprise wants to achieve for its information and technology governance and management processes, based on its strategy, objectives, needs, and expectations. The targeted capability levels provide a basis for defining the improvement goals and objectives for the processes. The capability-level gap analysis is a process that involves comparing the current capability levels of an enterprise’s information and technology governance and management processes with the targeted capability levels, and identifying the gaps or differences between them. The capability-level gap analysis helps to determine the improvement actions and initiatives that are required to close the gaps and achieve the targeted capability levels. The primary benefit or output derived from setting targeted capability levels and performing a capability-level gap analysis for selected processes is identification of process improvement opportunities. This means that by setting targeted capability levels and performing a capability-level gap analysis for selected processes, an enterprise can identify the areas of weakness or inefficiency in its information and technology governance and management processes, and determine the potential solutions or enhancements that can improve its process performance, quality, value, etc. This will also help to align the information and technology governance system with the enterprise’s strategy and objectives.References: : COBIT 2019 Design Guide: page 53-54 : COBIT 2019 Process Assessment Model: page 11-13

 The management of the IT function is the function that leads and manages the information and technology function in an enterprise, as well as supports and enables the information and technology governance. The management of the IT function includes roles such as CIO, IT managers, IT process owners, IT service owners, etc. The management of the IT function is responsible for resolving conflicting priorities in order to finalize the governance system design. The governance system design is the process of designing and implementing a governance system for an enterprise using COBIT 2019. The governance system design involves tailoring the COBIT 2019 components such as principles, enablers, goals, processes, practices, roles, structures, metrics etc., according to the enterprise’s context and needs. The governance system design also involves considering various design factors such as enterprise strategy archetype; enterprise goals; IT-related goals; risk profile; IT deployment; threat landscape; compliance requirement; operating environment; size of enterprise; culture; stakeholders; etc., that influence how an enterprise designs and implements its governance system using COBIT 2019. By resolving conflicting priorities in order to finalize the governance system design, the management of the IT function ensures that the governance system is appropriate for the enterprise’s strategy objectives performance risks issues opportunities etc., that it delivers value and benefits to the enterprise and its stakeholders that it aligns with the relevant standards guidelines regulations best practices etc., that it meets stakeholder requirements and expectations etc34 References: 3: COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives: page 20-21 4: COBIT 2019 Design Guide: page 33-48