CGEIT Exam Dumps - Isaca Certification Questions and Answers

A due diligence process is the best way to enable a clear understanding of the vendor’s capabilities that will be critical to the enterprise’s strategy. A due diligence process is a systematic and comprehensive investigation and evaluation of the vendor’s background, reputation, performance, quality, reliability, security, compliance, and suitability for the enterprise’s needs and expectations. A due diligence process can help the enterprise:

• Verify the vendor’s claims and credentials, and validate the vendor’s references and testimonials
• Assess the vendor’s financial stability, legal status, and ethical standards
• Identify the vendor’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats
• Compare the vendor’s offerings, capabilities, and prices with other vendors and market benchmarks
• Determine the risks and benefits of engaging with the vendor, and the mitigation and contingency plans
• Negotiate the terms and conditions of the contract, service level agreement (SLA), and key performance indicators (KPIs)

References:

• According to the CGEIT Review Manual 2022, "Due diligence is a comprehensive appraisal of a business undertaken by a prospective buyer or partner to establish its assets and liabilities and evaluate its commercial potential."1
• According to the ISACA article on Third-Party Vendor Selection: If Done Right, It’s a Win-Win2, “Once you have identified which processes can be outsourced as well as their inherent risks, you can begin performing due diligence on potential vendors. The level of due diligence should be tailored to the significance of the relationship as well as the potential risks it poses.”
• According to the Gartner article on How to Evaluate Technology Vendors in 4 Rigorous Steps1, “Evaluating vendors requires detailed objectives, criteria, prioritization and monitoring. Here’s help. When it comes to choosing a vendor, enterprise tech buyer teams can easily become bogged down in the details and documentation provided by sales teams.”

To obtain a holistic view of IT performance and identify potential gaps in service delivery, a CIO should review Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). KPIs are quantifiable measures that reflect the critical success factors of an organization and provide a comprehensive overview of performance across various aspects of IT service delivery, including efficiency, effectiveness, quality, and compliance with agreed service levels. While ROI analysis, SLA reporting, and staff performance evaluations offer valuable insights into specific areas, KPIs provide a broader perspective that encompasses various dimensions of IT performance, making them essential for a comprehensive assessment.

• This is because moving all IT applications to an external SaaS cloud provider means that the organization is outsourcing the development, deployment, maintenance, and operation of its IT applications to a third-party vendor. This implies that the organization is relinquishing some control and ownership over its IT applications, and relying on the vendor to provide the required functionality, performance, quality, and security1. Therefore, the organization needs to shift its focus from delivering IT services internally to managing IT services externally. This involves the following activities2:

The shift from service delivery to service management can have a significant impact on the IT governance framework, processes, policies, and practices of the organization. It can also affect the IT skills, roles, and responsibilities of the IT staff and stakeholders. Therefore, the organization needs to adapt and adjust its IT governance approach accordingly to ensure that it can effectively oversee and optimize its IT services in a SaaS environment3.

The other options, the integration of the IT department with business lines, the improvement of IT service alignment with business, and the necessity to update key risk indicators (KRIs) are not as significant as the shift from service delivery to service management for moving all IT applications to an external SaaS cloud provider from an IT governance perspective. They are more related to the outcomes or consequences of moving to a SaaS environment, rather than the impact or change itself. They may also not be unique or specific to a SaaS environment, as they may apply to other types or models of IT service delivery as well.

A vendor risk assessment is the most important consideration when integrating a new vendor with an ERP system, because it helps to identify and evaluate the potential risks or hazards associated with the vendor’s operations and products and their impact on the organization. A vendor risk assessment can cover aspects such as security, compliance, quality, reliability, performance, and contingency plans. By conducting a vendor risk assessment, the organization can mitigate the risks and ensure a smooth and secure integration with the ERP system. The other options are not as important as a vendor risk assessment, because they are either dependent on or secondary to it. IT senior management selects the vendor based on the results of the vendor risk assessment and other criteria. ERP data mapping is approved by the enterprise architect after the vendor risk assessment confirms that the vendor’s data is compatible and consistent with the ERP system. Procurement provides the terms of the contract after the vendor risk assessment validates that the vendor meets the organizational standards and obligations. References := Guide to Vendor Risk Assessment, 10 Risk Assessment Factors for ERP System Integration Projects, Ensuring Vendor Compliance and Third-Party Risk Mitigation

 A common risk management taxonomy is a set of terms and definitions that are used consistently across the enterprise to describe, measure, and report on risks. A common risk management taxonomy is essential for integrating IT risk with the ERM framework, as it enables a common understanding of risk concepts, categories, and levels among different stakeholders and functions. A common risk management taxonomy also facilitates the aggregation and comparison of risks across the enterprise, and supports the alignment of risk appetite and tolerance with business objectives12. References: 1: Integrated Enterprise IT Risk Management (ERM) Programs - CohnReznick3 2: Introducing Risk Taxonomy - ISACA4

Integrating IT security policies into individual performance objectives is the best way to support the objective of driving a cultural shift to enhance compliance with IT security policies. This is because performance objectives are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) goals that define what each employee is expected to accomplish and how they will be evaluated1. By integrating IT security policies into performance objectives, the enterprise can:

• Communicate the importance and value of IT security policies to each employee2
• Motivate and incentivize employees to comply with IT security policies2
• Monitor and measure employees’ compliance with IT security policies2
• Provide feedback and recognition to employees who comply with IT security policies2
• Identify and address any gaps or issues in employees’ compliance with IT security policies2

Integrating IT security policies into performance objectives can help to create a culture of accountability, responsibility, and awareness for IT security within the enterprise. It can also help to align the individual goals of employees with the organizational goals of IT governance.

The other options, communicating IT security policies on a regular basis, acknowledging and signing IT security policies by each employee, and centrally posting IT security policies with detailed instructions are not as effective as integrating IT security policies into performance objectives for supporting the objective of driving a cultural shift to enhance compliance with IT security policies. They are more related to the dissemination and implementation of IT security policies, rather than their integration and evaluation. They may not have a significant impact on the behavior and attitude of employees towards IT security policies, as they may not provide sufficient motivation, feedback, or recognition for compliance. They may also be perceived as passive, formal, or coercive methods of enforcing IT security policies, rather than active, informal, or collaborative methods of engaging employees in IT security policies. References := Performance Objectives - SMART Goals - BusinessBalls, How to Integrate Security Into Employee Performance Objectives, IT Security Policy: Key Components & Best Practices for Every Business …

 The next course of action in response to the CIO’s concern is to assess the risk associated with the device. This means that the CIO should evaluate the potential impact and likelihood of security threats posed by the device, such as data leakage, unauthorized access, malware infection, or privacy violation. The CIO should also consider the benefits and drawbacks of allowing or banning such devices, such as productivity, innovation, user satisfaction, or compliance. A risk assessment can help the CIO to make an informed decision based on facts and evidence, rather than assumptions or emotions. A risk assessment can also provide a basis for defining a risk mitigation strategy, updating the acceptable use policy, or researching competitor usage of similar devices. References := 10 security risks of wearables | CSO Online, Wearable Devices are on the Rise, Presenting New Security Risks, Common privacy and security vulnerabilities in wearable devices, Wearables Device Data Security & Protection | Voler Systems

Information architecture is the design and organization of data and information assets in an enterprise, such as databases, documents, metadata, and taxonomies. Enterprise architecture (EA) is the holistic view and planning of the business strategy, processes, systems, and technology in an enterprise, such as business architecture, application architecture, data architecture, and technology architecture1. Aligning information architecture with EA means ensuring that the data and information assets are consistent, coherent, and supportive of the EA goals and objectives2.

The primary benefit of aligning information architecture with EA is that it enables the tracing of data to business functions, which means that the data can be linked to the business processes, activities, roles, and outcomes that use or produce it. This benefit has several advantages for the enterprise, such as34:

• Improving data quality, accuracy, and reliability by identifying and resolving any data issues or gaps in the business functions
• Enhancing data governance, security, and compliance by defining and enforcing the data policies and standards for the business functions
• Increasing data value, usability, and accessibility by providing the data consumers with relevant and timely data for their business functions
• Supporting data-driven decision making and innovation by enabling the analysis and evaluation of data for the business functions

The other options are not the primary benefit of aligning information architecture with EA, but rather secondary or potential benefits. Improving communication with senior management and the business is a benefit of EA in general, but not specific to information architecture alignment. Ensuring the adoption of enterprise data quality standards is a benefit of data governance, which may be facilitated by information architecture alignment, but not guaranteed. Facilitating appropriate access to data consumers is a benefit of data security and privacy, which may be improved by information architecture alignment, but not directly.

References: 1: What is Enterprise Architecture? | Gartner1 2: Aligning Information Architecture with Business Strategy - DATAVERSITY2 3: The Benefits of Enterprise Architecture in Organizational …3 4: An Enterprise Architecture Approach for Assessing the Alignment Between

This is because SLAs are contractual agreements that specify the expectations, responsibilities, and performance standards for both the service provider and the customer. SLAs can help to define controls that mitigate the risks of outsourcing, such as data security, quality, availability, reliability, compliance, and contingency. SLAs can also help to monitor and measure the performance and value of the outsourced services, as well as to establish mechanisms for reporting, escalation, and resolution of any issues or disputes.

Some of the sources that support this answer are:

• 1: This source provides a comprehensive guide on how to create a social media governance plan that covers the key elements of a social media policy, compliance management, security and risk mitigation, decision-making and approval workflow, and crisis management. It mentions that SLAs are one of the tools that can help to manage the risks of outsourcing social media activities to third parties.
• 2: This source discusses the gaps, risks, and opportunities of social media governance in the context of Australian public communication. It suggests that SLAs are one of the best practices for developing and implementing a social media strategy that aligns with the organizational goals and values, as well as the legal and ethical obligations.
• 3: This source explores the benefits and challenges of outsourcing IT services in the public sector. It emphasizes the importance of SLAs for defining the scope, quality, and cost of the outsourced services, as well as for managing the performance and accountability of the service providers.
• 4: This source presents a framework for managing IT outsourcing risks based on ISO 31000. It recommends that SLAs should include risk-related clauses that specify the roles and responsibilities of both parties, the risk identification and assessment methods, the risk response and treatment options, and the risk monitoring and reporting mechanisms.

The best way to address the issue of IT staff not keeping their skills current, despite an adequate training budget, is to establish an agreed-upon skills development plan with each employee. This personalized approach ensures that training and development activities are directly aligned with both the organization's needs and the individual's career goals, thereby increasing the likelihood of participation and the application of new skills. While providing incentives and creating centers of excellence can be supportive, a tailored development plan directly engages each staff member in their growth, ensuring relevance and commitment.

• This is because KPIs are measurable values that indicate how well the IT governance framework is achieving its objectives and delivering value to the business1. By evaluating KPI results, the organization can:

Evaluating KPI results can provide a comprehensive and objective overview of the IT governance framework’s effectiveness and impact.

The other options, developing a business case for the program portfolio, benchmarking the IT governance framework to industry best practice, and reviewing results of IT audit reports are not as effective as evaluating KPI results for assessing the effectiveness of a newly established IT governance framework. They are more related to the design and implementation of the IT governance framework, rather than its evaluation. They may also be too narrow or subjective for assessing the IT governance framework’s effectiveness, as they may not cover all aspects or perspectives of the IT governance framework. They may also depend on external factors or standards that may not be relevant or applicable to the organization’s specific context and needs.

A third-party audit report is the most comprehensive source of information regarding the current status and effectiveness of a cloud provider’s controls. A third-party audit report is an independent and objective assessment of the cloud provider’s security, compliance, and performance by a qualified and reputable auditor. A third-party audit report can provide assurance to the cloud customers that the cloud provider has implemented adequate and effective controls to meet the industry standards and best practices, as well as the contractual obligations and customer expectations12.

A globally recognized certification is a credential that demonstrates that a cloud provider has met certain criteria or standards for security, quality, or performance. A globally recognized certification can provide some level of confidence to the cloud customers that the cloud provider has achieved a minimum level of compliance or competence, but it may not provide enough details or evidence about the current status and effectiveness of the cloud provider’s controls3.

A control self-assessment (CSA) is a process that enables a cloud provider to evaluate its own controls internally, without involving an external auditor. A CSA can help a cloud provider to identify and address any gaps or weaknesses in its controls, as well as to monitor and improve its performance. However, a CSA may not provide sufficient assurance to the cloud customers, as it may lack objectivity, transparency, and validity4.

A maturity assessment is a process that measures the level of maturity or capability of a cloud provider’s processes or practices. A maturity assessment can help a cloud provider to benchmark its performance against industry standards or best practices, as well as to identify areas for improvement or innovation. However, a maturity assessment may not provide enough information about the current status and effectiveness of the cloud provider’s controls, as it may focus more on the process rather than the outcome5.

References: 1: Cloud Security Auditing: Challenges and Emerging Approaches - IEEE Journals & Magazine1 2: Cloud Security Audit: What You Need to Know | CloudHealth by VMware2 3: Cloud Security Certifications: What You Need to Know | CloudHealth by VMware3 4: Control Self-Assessment - ISACA4 5: Maturity Assessment - ISACA

The best way for IT to achieve compliance with regulatory requirements is to enforce IT policies and procedures that align with the compliance standards and guidelines. IT policies and procedures are the documents that define the roles, responsibilities, rules, and expectations for the IT function and its activities. They help to ensure that the IT systems and processes are secure, reliable, efficient, and consistent with the business objectives and legal obligations. By enforcing IT policies and procedures, IT can demonstrate its compliance with regulatory requirements and avoid violations, penalties, or reputational damage. The other options are not as effective as enforcing IT policies and procedures for achieving compliance with regulatory requirements. Creating an IT project portfolio is a good practice for managing IT investments and resources, but it does not guarantee compliance with regulatory requirements. Reviewing an IT performance dashboard is a useful technique for monitoring and measuring IT performance and value delivery, but it does not ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. Reporting on IT audit findings and action plans is a necessary step for improving IT governance and control processes, but it does not achieve compliance with regulatory requirements. References := What is IT Compliance? - Checklist, Guidelines & More | Proofpoint US, 6 Common IT Compliance Standards (A Guide to the Basics), Here’s Why Regulatory Compliance is Important - Reciprocity

The primary role of the governance function in enabling an enterprise to achieve its business objectives is to provide a means to effectively manage stakeholders. Stakeholders are the individuals or groups that have an interest or stake in the enterprise’s activities, outcomes, and performance. They include shareholders, customers, employees, suppliers, regulators, and society at large. Effective stakeholder management involves identifying, engaging, communicating, and satisfying the needs and expectations of the stakeholders in a transparent and ethical manner. By providing a means to effectively manage stakeholders, the governance function can help the enterprise to align its vision, mission, strategy, and values with the stakeholder interests, foster trust and collaboration among the stakeholder groups, balance the economic and social goals and the individual and communal goals of the enterprise, and enhance the reputation and legitimacy of the enterprise in the market and society.

The other options are not as primary as providing a means to effectively manage stakeholders for the governance function. Determining risk thresholds that the enterprise can sustain is an important aspect of the governance function, but it is not the primary role. Risk thresholds are the levels of risk exposure that the enterprise is willing to accept or tolerate in pursuit of its business objectives. They are derived from the enterprise’s risk appetite and risk tolerance statements, which reflect the enterprise’s culture, values, and strategy. The governance function can help to define, communicate, and monitor the risk thresholds that the enterprise can sustain, but this is not its primary role. Preparing business continuity and resiliency plans is a vital responsibility of the management function, not the governance function. Business continuity and resiliency plans are the documents that outline the processes and procedures for ensuring the continuity of critical business functions and operations in the event of a disruption or crisis. They also describe how the enterprise can recover from the disruption or crisis and resume normal operations as soon as possible. The governance function can oversee and approve the business continuity and resiliency plans prepared by the management function, but this is not its primary role. Monitoring strategic plans to reach the desired target state is a key activity of both the governance function and the management function, but it is not their primary role. Strategic plans are the documents that define the long-term goals and objectives of the enterprise and how they will be achieved. They also specify the resources, actions, measures, and timelines for implementing the strategy. The governance function can set the direction and scope of the strategic plans, while the management function can execute and report on them. Both functions can monitor the progress and performance of the strategic plans to reach the desired target state, but this is not their primary role. References := The five functions of governance – Project Manager, What is a Governance Structure? - ESG | The Report, Develop an effective governance structure | Australian Public Service …

Performing stage-gate reviews throughout the life cycle of each project is the best way to ensure IT investment management processes are fully realizing the benefits identified in business cases. Stage-gate reviews provide structured checkpoints at critical phases of a project, allowing for the evaluation of progress, performance against objectives, and the continued viability and alignment with business goals. This approach enables timely adjustments to be made, ensuring that projects stay on track to deliver the expected benefits. While CIO review and approval, evaluating delegation of authority, and documenting lessons learned are valuable, they do not offer the continuous oversight and opportunity for course correction that stage-gate reviews do.