CGEIT Exam Dumps - Isaca Certification Questions and Answers

When determining the optimal IT service levels to support business, the most important factor is the cost/benefit to the business. This means that the IT service levels should be aligned with the business objectives, needs, and expectations, and that the benefits of providing a certain level of IT service should outweigh the costs of delivering it. The cost/benefit analysis should consider both the direct and indirect costs and benefits of IT service levels, such as the impact on customer satisfaction, revenue, productivity, quality, risk, compliance, innovation, and competitive advantage. A cost/benefit analysis can help IT managers justify their IT service level decisions and communicate them effectively to the business stakeholders. References := IT cost/benefit analysis: Why it matters and how to do it right, IT Support Levels Clearly Explained: L1, L2, L3 & More, IT support levels: definition, tiers and advantages, The Importance of Adopting Formal IT Service Management

The security status of a new business acquisition is a critical factor that can affect the value, performance, and reputation of the acquiring company. Therefore, it is essential to conduct a thorough IT risk assessment of the target company as part of the overall due diligence process. An IT risk assessment can help to identify and evaluate the current and potential cybersecurity threats, vulnerabilities, and controls in the target company’s IT environment, as well as the compliance with relevant laws and regulations. An IT risk assessment can also help to estimate the costs and efforts required to remediate any security gaps or issues, and to align the security policies and standards of both parties. By integrating IT risk assessment into the due diligence process, the acquiring company can make informed decisions about the feasibility, valuation, and integration of the new business acquisition12. References: Due diligence for Mergers and Acquisitions through a cybersecurity lens. Microsoft Security tips for mitigating risk in mergers and acquisitions.

 Appointing an IT representative to the business risk committee is the best way to address senior management’s concern about IT investment risks, as it would ensure that IT risks are properly identified, assessed, and communicated to the business stakeholders. The IT representative would also be able to align IT risk management with the enterprise’s risk appetite and strategy, and provide input and feedback on the IT investment decisions. The other options are not as effective, as they do not involve direct collaboration and communication between IT and business on risk matters. References: : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 4: Risk Optimization, Section 4.3: IT Risk Management, Subsection 4.3.1: IT Risk Management Overview, Page 153 : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 4: Risk Optimization, Section 4.3: IT Risk Management, Subsection 4.3.2: IT Risk Management Process, Page 156 : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 4: Risk Optimization, Section 4.3: IT Risk Management, Subsection 4.3.5: Roles and Responsibilities for IT Risk Management, Page 161

The first course of action for the CIO of an enterprise to help plan for the possibility of ransomed corporate data should be to request a targeted risk assessment. This is because a targeted risk assessment can help to identify and evaluate the specific threats, vulnerabilities, and impacts of ransomware attacks on the enterprise’s data and systems. A targeted risk assessment can also help to determine the likelihood and severity of ransomware incidents, as well as the appropriate controls and mitigation strategies to reduce the risk to an acceptable level.

Requiring development of key risk indicators (KRIs) is not the first course of action, as it is a monitoring tool for measuring the risk exposure and performance. KRIs are metrics that provide information on the current level and trend of risk in relation to the risk appetite and tolerance of the enterprise. KRIs can help to track and report the progress and effectiveness of the risk management activities, as well as alert the management of any potential issues or changes that may affect the risk profile. However, requiring development of KRIs does not provide a comprehensive analysis or improvement plan for ransomed corporate data.

Developing a policy to address ransomware is not the first course of action, as it is a result of conducting a targeted risk assessment. A policy to address ransomware is a document that defines the rules, guidelines, and responsibilities for preventing, detecting, responding to, and recovering from ransomware attacks. Developing a policy to address ransomware can help to communicate the expectations and requirements for ransomware protection and compliance, as well as enforce accountability and governance for ransomware incidents. However, developing a policy to address ransomware does not provide a detailed assessment or guidance for ransomed corporate data.

Backing up corporate data to a secure location is not the first course of action, as it is an implementation step after conducting a targeted risk assessment and developing a policy to address ransomware. Backing up corporate data to a secure location can help to preserve the availability, integrity, and confidentiality of the data in case of a ransomware attack. Backing up corporate data to a secure location can also help to restore the data and resume normal operations after a ransomware attack. However, backing up corporate data to a secure location does not provide a thorough risk analysis or governance framework for ransomed corporate data.

References := Ransomware Risk Management: NISTIR 8374, 3 Risk Management Process section. Managing the Risks of Ransomware - SEI Blog, Assess Your Risk section. Ransomware Risk Management - NIST, 4 Ransomware Risk Management Profile section. NIST Releases Tips and Tactics for Dealing With Ransomware, Back Up Your Data section.

 An IT steering committee is a group of senior executives who are responsible for directing, reviewing, and approving IT strategic plans, overseeing major initiatives, and allocating resources. They are the most appropriate group to approve the implementation of new technology, as they can ensure that it aligns with the organization’s vision, mission, goals, and objectives. They can also evaluate the business case, risks, benefits, and alternatives of the new technology and provide guidance and support to the IT team. According to one of the web search results1, “the steering committee establishes IT priorities for the business as a whole.” References := What is an IT Steering Committee? – BMC Software | Blogs

 Ensuring IT risk management is aligned with business risk appetite is the primary ongoing responsibility of the IT governance function related to risk, as it helps to ensure that the IT risks are consistent with the enterprise’s objectives, strategy, and tolerance for risk. IT risk management alignment also facilitates the integration of IT risk management with enterprise risk management (ERM), and the communication and reporting of IT risk to the relevant stakeholders123. References := CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 4, Subtopic B: IT Risk Management, Task 1: Ensure that an IT risk management framework exists to identify, analyze, mitigate, manage, monitor, and communicate IT-related business risk, and that the framework for IT risk management is in alignment with the enterprise risk management (ERM) framework.

 A balanced scorecard is a strategic management tool that measures and monitors the performance of an organization against its vision, mission, goals, and objectives. It uses four perspectives: financial, customer, internal process, and learning and growth. A balanced scorecard can help demonstrate the effectiveness of the IT reorganization by showing how the IT function has improved in terms of delivering value to the business, satisfying customer needs and expectations, optimizing internal processes and workflows, and enhancing the skills and capabilities of the IT staff. According to one of the web search results1, “a balanced scorecard can help evaluate the effectiveness of IT governance by aligning IT activities with business strategies, assessing IT value delivery, identifying IT strengths and weaknesses, and facilitating continuous improvement.” The number of help desk calls, a survey of IT staff, and IT cost reduction are not the best indicators of the effectiveness of the IT reorganization. They are more likely to reflect operational or tactical aspects of IT service delivery, rather than strategic or holistic ones. They may also be influenced by other factors that are not related to the IT reorganization, such as user behavior, staff morale, or market conditions. References := Service Delivery for IT and Business | Splunk

 The CIO should reevaluate the current IT strategy in light of the senior management’s decision to expand offshoring to include IT services. This means that the CIO should assess the impact of offshoring on the existing IT objectives, plans, resources, capabilities, risks, and performance. The CIO should also consider the potential benefits and challenges of offshoring IT services, such as cost reduction, access to talent, quality assurance, communication, coordination, and security. The CIO should then revise the current IT strategy to align with the enterprise’s offshoring strategy and goals, and communicate the changes to the relevant stakeholders

 Information architecture (IA) is the practice of structuring and presenting the parts of something — whether that’s a website, mobile app, blog post, book, or brick-and-mortar store — to users so that it’s easy to understand. IA can help users find information and complete tasks1.

An enterprise that has ineffective information architecture may suffer from poor business decisions, because it may not be able to access, analyze, or use the data and information that are relevant, accurate, consistent, and timely for decision making. Poor business decisions can lead to negative consequences, such as losing customers, market share, revenue, or competitive advantage, or facing legal, financial, reputational, or operational risks23.

Some examples of how ineffective information architecture can impact business decisions are:

• If the enterprise’s website has a confusing or inconsistent navigation system, users may not be able to find the information they need or want, such as product details, prices, reviews, or contact information. This can result in lower customer satisfaction, engagement, conversion, and retention14.
• If the enterprise’s data is stored in multiple systems or platforms that are not integrated or interoperable, users may not be able to access or share the data across different departments or functions. This can result in data silos, duplication, inconsistency, or incompleteness25.
• If the enterprise’s data is not labeled or categorized properly, users may not be able to search or filter the data effectively. This can result in data overload, irrelevance, or obscurity25.
• If the enterprise’s data is not governed or managed properly, users may not be able to trust or verify the data quality or integrity. This can result in data errors, inaccuracies, or biases25.

Therefore, an enterprise that has ineffective information architecture may have poor business decisions as its greatest impact. References: Information Architecture Basics | Usability.gov. The Importance of Information Architecture to UX Design. How Enterprise Architecture Can Help You Eliminate Technical Debt. What Is Information Architecture & Why Does It Matter? - HubSpot Blog. Why Do We Need Information Architecture - Architecture.

A business impact analysis (BIA) report is the most valuable input when quantifying the loss associated with a major risk event. A BIA report is a document that identifies and evaluates the potential effects of disruptions to critical business functions and processes. A BIA report can help estimate the financial, operational, reputational, and legal impacts of a risk event, as well as the recovery time and resources needed to resume normal operations. A BIA report can also help prioritize the recovery strategies and objectives based on the criticality and urgency of the business functions and processes.

The other options are not the most valuable input when quantifying the loss associated with a major risk event. Key risk indicators (KRIs) are metrics that provide an early warning of potential threats to the organization’s objectives and performance. KRIs can help monitor and measure the risk exposure and effectiveness of risk management activities, but they do not directly quantify the loss associated with a risk event. IT environment threat modeling is a technique that identifies and analyzes the possible vulnerabilities and attack vectors in an IT system or network. Threat modeling can help improve the security and resilience of IT assets and services, but it does not directly quantify the loss associated with a risk event. Recovery time objectives (RTOs) are the maximum acceptable time frames for restoring business functions and processes after a disruption. RTOs can help determine the recovery priorities and strategies, but they do not directly quantify the loss associated with a risk event.

For more information on BIA and quantifying loss, you can refer to these web sources:

• What is Business Impact Analysis? Definition, Benefits & Examples
• Quantifying Loss Associated with Major Risk Event - Exam-Answer
• Quantifying the Qualitative Technology Risk Assessment - ISACA

To generate value for the enterprise, it is most important that IT investments are consistent with the enterprise’s business objectives. This means that IT investments should support and enable the achievement of the enterprise’s vision, mission, goals, and strategies. IT investments should also align with the enterprise’s values, culture, risk appetite, and stakeholder expectations. By ensuring that IT investments are consistent with the enterprise’s business objectives, the enterprise can maximize the benefits and value that IT can deliver, and avoid wasting resources on IT projects or initiatives that are not relevant, necessary, or effective. According to one source1, “Driving value creation with technology investments requires a clear understanding of how technology can enable business strategy and create value for the organization.” The other options are not the most important factor for generating value for the enterprise, but rather some of the steps or outcomes that can support or result from IT investments. Aligning IT investments with the IT strategic objectives is important, but not sufficient, as the IT strategic objectives should also be aligned with the enterprise’s business objectives. Approving IT investments by the CFO is a part of the financial governance process, but it does not guarantee that the IT investments are consistent with the enterprise’s business objectives. Including IT investments in the balanced scorecard is a way of measuring and reporting on the performance and value of IT investments, but it does not ensure that the IT investments are consistent with the enterprise’s business objectives. References := Driving value creation with technology investments

Information architecture (IA) is the process of guiding users through the site by organising and arranging all the relevant content in a clear, intuitive way. It also ensures consistency throughout a product’s design by standardising labelling conventions such as menu names, link titles, and button labels across all pages1. If enterprise IT has overseen the implementation of an array of data services with overlapping functionality, it may indicate that they have not followed a coherent and effective IA strategy. This can lead to business inefficiencies, such as duplication of efforts, confusion among users, and difficulty in finding and accessing information. According to one of the web search results2, “Application rationalization is a simple first step to analyze the current architecture to determine redundant applications, overlapping functionality, and software that is not exactly current. As more companies move into a service-oriented architecture implementation, this analysis is a cost-effective way to ensure that the IT resources are utilized in the most efficient manner.” Ineffective project management, an outdated service level agreement (SLA), and an incomplete cost-benefit analysis are not the most likely causes of this situation. They are more related to the planning, execution, and evaluation of individual projects, rather than the overall design and organisation of information systems. References := What is information architecture? - UX Design Institute, Staying Current And Supporting Systems With Overlapping Functionality

The first governance action for implementing a BYOD program should be to assess the BYOD risk. This is because BYOD introduces various security, legal, and operational risks to the enterprise, such as data loss or leakage, unauthorized access, malware infection, compliance violation, device management, and user privacy. Assessing the BYOD risk can help to identify and evaluate the potential threats, vulnerabilities, and impacts of allowing employees to use personal devices for email. Assessing the BYOD risk can also help to determine the appropriate controls and mitigation strategies to reduce the risk to an acceptable level.

Assessing the enterprise architecture (EA) is not the first governance action, as it is a subsequent step after assessing the BYOD risk. EA is a framework that defines the structure, components, relationships, and principles of the enterprise’s IT environment. Assessing the EA can help to ensure that the BYOD program aligns with the enterprise’s vision, strategy, goals, and standards. However, assessing the EA does not address the specific risks associated with BYOD.

Updating the network infrastructure is not the first governance action, as it is an implementation step after assessing the BYOD risk and EA. Updating the network infrastructure can help to enhance the performance, reliability, scalability, and security of the network that supports the BYOD program. However, updating the network infrastructure does not provide a comprehensive risk assessment or governance framework for BYOD.

Updating the BYOD policy is not the first governance action, as it is a result of assessing the BYOD risk and EA. A BYOD policy is a document that defines the rules, guidelines, and responsibilities for employees who use personal devices for email. Updating the BYOD policy can help to communicate the expectations and requirements for BYOD users and enforce compliance and accountability. However, updating the BYOD policy does not provide a thorough risk analysis or architectural alignment for BYOD.

References := BYOD Best Practices - JumpCloud, Assessing your needs section. End user device security for Bring-Your-Own-Device (BYOD) deployment models - ITSM.70.003 - Canadian Centre for Cyber Security, 1 Introduction section. BYOD Policy Best Practices: The Ultimate Checklist - Scalefusion, Introduction section. The Ultimate Guide to BYOD Security: Definition & More - Digital Guardian, The Challenges of BYOD Security section.

 The most important benefit of developing an information architecture model consistent with enterprise strategy is that it supports and facilitates decision making. Information architecture is the part of the enterprise architecture process that describes the current state, future state, and guidance necessary to flexibly share and exchange information assets to achieve effective enterprise change1. Information architecture is an aspect of enterprise architecture that enables an information strategy or business solution through the definition of the company’s business information assets, their sources, structure, classification and associations2. By developing an information architecture model that aligns with the enterprise strategy, the organization can ensure that the information assets are relevant, accurate, timely, and accessible for the decision makers. An information architecture model can also help the organization to identify information gaps, redundancies, and opportunities, and to prioritize information initiatives and investments. Moreover, an information architecture model can enable the organization to leverage its data and analytics capabilities to generate insights and value from the information assets. Therefore, developing an information architecture model consistent with enterprise strategy is crucial for supporting and facilitating decision making at all levels of the organization. References: Enterprise Business Strategy and Architecture | Deloitte US3, Business strategy modelling based on enterprise architecture: a state of the art review | Emerald Insight4, Enterprise Information Architecture (EIA) - CIO Wiki1, Data Architecture and Information Architecture: What’s … - DATAVERSITY2

 Data stewardship has the greatest influence on data quality assurance. Data stewardship is the process of defining, implementing, and enforcing policies and standards for data quality, security, privacy, and usage1. Data stewards are the individuals or groups who are responsible for ensuring that the data is accurate, consistent, complete, timely, and compliant with the business rules and regulations2. Data stewardship involves activities such as data profiling, data cleansing, data validation, data monitoring, and data reporting3. Data stewardship helps to improve the trustworthiness and usability of the data for analysis and decision making. References: Data Quality Assurance: Importance & Best Practices in 2023 - AIMultiple1, Data Owners vs. Data Stewards vs. Data Custodians - CPO Magazine2, What is Data Stewardship? - Talend3