CBAP Exam Dumps - IIBA Certified Business Analysis Professional Questions and Answers

 The BA can use organizational modeling to highlight the required changes to the structure. Organizational modeling is a technique that involves creating a graphical representation of the roles, responsibilities, relationships, and reporting lines within an organization. It can help to illustrate the current and future states of the organization, identify the gaps and impacts of the change, and communicate the proposed solution to the stakeholders. In this case, the BA can use organizational modeling to show how the process for the first contact resolution for customer issues will be streamlined by having a single point of contact instead of two separate divisions. References:

CBAP / CCBA Certified Business Analysis Study Guide, 2nd Edition, Chapter 5: Strategy Analysis, Section 5.1: Analyze Current State, p. 207-208

A Guide to the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge® (BABOK® Guide), Version 3, Chapter 5: Strategy Analysis, Section 5.1: Analyze Current State, p. 107-108

A Guide to the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge® (BABOK® Guide), Version 3, Chapter 10: Solution Evaluation, Section 10.5: Assess Organizational Readiness, p. 281-282

 According to the BABOK® Guide, one of the tasks of the business analyst (BA) is to assess solution performance and value. This involves measuring the actual outcomes and benefits of the implemented solution and comparing them with the expected ones. The BA also identifies any gaps or issues that may affect the solution’s performance or value and recommends actions to address them. One of the actions that the BA can recommend is to remove or minimize any interfaces and activities that do not contribute to the final product either directly or indirectly, as they may cause waste, inefficiency, or complexity. This is consistent with the lean principles of eliminating waste and optimizing value. References: BABOK® Guide v3, Section 7.6: Assess Solution Performance and Value, p. 291-292; BABOK® Guide v3, Section 10.22: Lean, p. 512-513.

A stakeholder engagement approach is a plan that describes how the BA will interact with the stakeholders, identify their needs and expectations, and address their concerns and issues. A stakeholder engagement approach can help the BA avoid disagreements and conflicts by ensuring that the stakeholders are involved and informed throughout the business analysis process, and that their feedback and input are considered and incorporated. A stakeholder engagement approach can also help the BA build trust and rapport with the stakeholders, and manage their expectations and influence levels. By following a stakeholder engagement approach, the BA can ensure that the business analysis approach and the budget estimates are aligned with the stakeholder needs and agreed upon by all the relevant parties. References:

IIBA BABOK Guide, Section 3.2, Plan Stakeholder Engagement

Five-Step Approach to Stakeholder Engagement, BSR

5 steps to creating a stakeholder engagement plan (with template), Asana

 A risk-averse organization is one that prefers to minimize or eliminate the exposure to risks, even if it means sacrificing some potential benefits or opportunities. A risk avoidance strategy is one that involves changing the project plan, scope, schedule, or budget to avoid the risk or its impact. A risk avoidance strategy is suitable for a risk-averse organization, as it reduces the uncertainty and the potential negative consequences of the risk. In this scenario, the BA has identified an assumption that has a high degree of uncertainty and may affect the validity of the requirements. The BA has added the assumption to the risk register and performed a risk analysis to handle this situation. If the organization is risk-averse, the BA may use a risk avoidance strategy to modify the requirements or the solution design to eliminate the dependency on the assumption, or to seek more information or evidence to validate the assumption. A risk acceptance strategy is one that involves acknowledging the risk and its impact, but not taking any action to prevent or reduce it. A risk acceptance strategy is suitable for a risk-seeking or risk-neutral organization, or for risks that have low probability or impact. A risk transfer strategy is one that involves shifting the responsibility or ownership of the risk or its impact to a third party, such as a vendor, a partner, or an insurer. A risk transfer strategy is suitable for risks that have high impact but low probability, or for risks that require specialized skills or resources to manage. A risk mitigation strategy is one that involves taking actions to reduce the probability or impact of the risk, such as implementing contingency plans, preventive measures, or backup solutions. A risk mitigation strategy is suitable for risks that have high probability and impact, or for risks that can be controlled or influenced by the project team. References: BABOK Guide v3, Chapter 10: Techniques, Section 10.51: Risk Analysis and Management, p. 567-569; Free CBAP IIBA Actual Exam Questions & Answers, Question 467.

 Scalability is a non-functional requirement that refers to the ability of a system to handle increasing workloads or demands without compromising its performance or functionality. System B supports scalability over System A, as it can process double the number of claims that System A can, and it rarely goes offline. System A, on the other hand, would be at capacity if it were to process all of the company’s claims, and it must go offline for two hours each day. References: The answer can be verified from the Business Analysis Professional (CBAP) learning documents or resources, such as:

IIBA BABOK Guide, Section 4.2.3, Non-Functional Requirements

Non-Functional Requirements: Definition, Types, and Examples, ReQtest

Non-Functional Requirements: Scalability, Software Engineering Stack Exchange

 The BA should recommend to assign the feature a lower priority for future release. This means that the feature will not be included in the initial release of the solution, but it may be considered for later releases depending on the availability of resources, the feedback from the stakeholders, and the alignment with the business objectives. This approach can help to balance the value and the effort of the feature, as well as to avoid scope creep and unnecessary complexity in the initial release. The other options are not the best recommendations, as they may either ignore the needs of the stakeholders, disrupt the existing business process, or increase the risk and cost of the project. References:

CBAP / CCBA Certified Business Analysis Study Guide, 2nd Edition, Chapter 6: Requirements Analysis and Design Definition, Section 6.3: Prioritize Requirements, p. 255-256

A Guide to the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge® (BABOK® Guide), Version 3, Chapter 6: Requirements Analysis and Design Definition, Section 6.3: Prioritize Requirements, p. 155-156

 Quantitative and qualitative data are two types of data that can help the end users evaluate the effectiveness of a solution. Quantitative data are numerical, measurable, and objective, such as cost, time, scope, quality, and customer satisfaction. Qualitative data are descriptive, subjective, and interpretive, such as feedback, opinions, perceptions, and experiences. By using both types of data, the end users can assess the solution from different perspectives and dimensions, and compare the results with the predefined success criteria for the initiative. References:

Project Success Criteria Guide, Smartsheet

7 Project Success Criteria Examples, Indeed.com

IIBA BABOK Guide, Section 5.4, Evaluate Solution Performance