Secure-Software-Design Exam Dumps - WGU Courses and Certificates Questions and Answers

White box testing, also known as clear box testing, glass box testing, transparent box testing, and structural testing, is a method of software testing where the internal structure, design, and coding of the software are tested to verify the flow of input-output and to improve the design, usability, and security. It involves looking at the structures that are internal to the system, with the tester having knowledge of the internal workings of the product. This type of testing is concerned with examining the internal logical structures of the program and is typically performed by stepping through the code line by line to analyze the program for potential errors, which aligns with the description of the control test in question.

References:

Control Structure Testing - GeeksforGeeks1

What is White Box Testing? - BrowserStack2

Software Testing Strategies Chapter 18 - IIT3

The step of the PASTA threat modeling methodology where the team will capture infrastructure, application, and software dependencies is the Define technical scope step. This step involves detailing the technical elements of the project, which includes understanding and documenting the infrastructure, applications, and software dependencies that are critical to the system’s operation and security.

References: The PASTA (Process for Attack Simulation and Threat Analysis) threat modeling methodology is a seven-step process that includes defining the technical scope as a critical step for capturing the necessary technical details of the system being analyzed123.

A threat profile is a security assessment deliverable that identifies possible security vulnerabilities in a product. It involves a systematic examination of the product to uncover any weaknesses that could potentially be exploited by threats. The process typically includes identifying the assets that need protection, assessing the threats to those assets, and evaluating the vulnerabilities that could be exploited by those threats. This deliverable is crucial for understanding the security posture of a product and for prioritizing remediation efforts.

References: The importance of a threat profile in identifying security vulnerabilities is supported by various security resources. For instance, Future Processing’s blog on vulnerability assessments outlines the steps involved in identifying security vulnerabilities, which align with the creation of a threat profile1. Additionally, UpGuard’s article on conducting vulnerability assessments further emphasizes the role of identifying vulnerabilities as part of the security assessment process2.

Data integrity requirements within a privacy impact statement ensure that personal information is maintained in an accurate and up-to-date manner. This involves establishing processes to regularly review and update personal data, as well as correct any inaccuracies. These requirements are crucial for maintaining the trustworthiness of the data and ensuring that decisions made based on this information are sound and reliable.

References:

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada’s guide on the Privacy Impact Assessment process emphasizes the importance of accuracy and currency of personal information1.

The European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) outlines principles for data processing, including the necessity for data to be accurate and kept up to date2.

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) also includes provisions for data protection impact assessments, which involve documenting processes before starting data processing3.

One of the four core values of the Agile Manifesto is prioritizing “individuals and interactions over processes and tools.” This value emphasizes the importance of the human element in software development, advocating for direct communication, collaboration, and the flexibility to adapt to change over strict adherence to rigid processes or reliance on specific tools. It recognizes that while processes and tools are important, they should serve the team and the individuals within it, rather than the other way around.

References: The Agile Manifesto itself, along with various interpretations and guides such as those provided by Smartsheet1 and LogRocket2, support this value as one of the central tenets of Agile methodologies. These resources offer insights into how this value, along with the other three, guide the Agile approach to efficient and effective software development.

The issue described involves a session management vulnerability where the user’s session remains active even after the browser window is closed, allowing another user on the same machine to access the application without logging in. To prevent this security risk, it’s essential to adjust the session management controls to include an automatic timeout feature. This means that after a period of inactivity, or when the browser window is closed, the session should automatically expire, requiring a new login to access the application. This adjustment ensures that even if a user forgets to log out, their session won’t remain active indefinitely, reducing the risk of unauthorized access.

References:

Secure SDLC practices emphasize the importance of security at every stage of the software development life cycle, including the implementation of proper session management controls12.

Best practices for access control in security highlight the significance of managing session timeouts to prevent unauthorized access3.

Industry standards and guidelines often recommend session timeouts as a critical security control to protect against unauthorized access4.

Validating user input data before it is processed by the application is a fundamental security control in software design. This process, known as input validation, ensures that only properly formed data is entering the workflow of the application, thereby preventing many types of attacks, including type mismatches as mentioned in the question. By validating input data, the application can reject any requests that contain unexpected or malicious data, reducing the risk of security vulnerabilities and ensuring the integrity of the system.

References:

Secure SDLC practices emphasize the importance of integrating security activities, such as creating security and functional requirements, code reviews, security testing, architectural analysis, and risk assessment, into the existing development workflow1.

A Secure Software Development Life Cycle (SSDLC) ensures that security is considered at every phase of the development process, from planning and design to coding, testing, deploying, and maintaining the software2.

Security testing reports are the most likely deliverables to contain detailed records of evaluations, their frequency, and re-evaluations. Here's why:

Purpose of Security Testing Reports: These reports document the results of security testing, including:

Types of tests: Vulnerability scans, penetration tests, code reviews, etc.

Frequency: How often tests were conducted (e.g., per build, per release cycle).

Re-evaluations: If vulnerabilities were discovered, these reports will track whether and how often those were retested after remediation.

Focus on Testing: The question specifically emphasizes evaluations, which aligns with the core content of security testing reports.

Dynamic analysis is a security testing method that involves analyzing the behavior of software while it is running or in execution. It is most commonly executed during the testing phase of the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). This type of analysis is used to detect issues that might not be visible in the code’s static state, such as runtime errors and memory leaks. Automated tools are employed to perform dynamic analysis, which can simulate attacks on the application and identify vulnerabilities that could be exploited by malicious actors.

References: The information provided here is verified by multiple sources that discuss security automation in the SDLC and the role of dynamic analysis during the testing phase123.