OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 Exam Dumps - OMG Certification Questions and Answers

In UML, class templates are the concept used to create classes that can be parameterized with different data types. This feature satisfies the first condition, allowing collections to support any data type. Class templates can be specialized, fulfilling the second condition, where some collections can inherit from others, thus enabling the reuse of functionality. Additionally, UML allows for operations to be defined in such a way that they cannot be overridden, by specifying them as non-virtual or final, which meets the third condition. Therefore, the use of class templates would be the most suitable approach for the design criteria specified by the programming language designers. This approach is consistent with the capabilities of class templates as described in the UML 2.x Superstructure Specification.

In UML, the keyword «isSubstitutable» is used to indicate that instances of one classifier may be used in place of instances of another classifier. This concept is commonly applied in the context of generalization, where a subclass can be substituted for its superclass. The substitutability is a fundamental principle of object-oriented design, particularly in the Liskov Substitution Principle, which states that objects of a superclass should be replaceable with objects of a subclass without affecting the correctness of the program. This principle is reflected in UML's support for polymorphism, which is implicit in the generalization relationships between classifiers.

The term “computationally complete” in the context of fUML refers to a subset of UML that is expressive enough to define models that can be executed automatically by a computer using an execution tool. This means that the subset includes all the necessary elements and constructs to specify the behavior of a system in a way that can be understood and run by a machine without further interpretation

The Model-Driven Architecture (MDA) approach is a design methodology that covers the entire software development lifecycle, from requirements to technology implementation. It emphasizes the use of models as the primary artifacts in the development process, allowing for a more abstract and high-level approach to software design. MDA supports the transformation of models from platform-independent models (PIMs) to platform-specific models (PSMs) and ultimately to code, ensuring that the initial requirements are accurately reflected in the final technology implementation.

MDA is not limited to Meta Data Aspects (A) or Design and Architectural Models (B) alone, nor is it primarily about deriving models from Artificial Intelligence Systems (D). Instead, it provides a comprehensive framework that facilitates the creation of software systems by bridging the gap between business requirements and technology solutions.

References:

• An MDA Approach Based on UML and ODM Standards to Support Big Data Analytics1
• Improving Automatic UML2 Profile Generation for MDA Industrial Development2
• Applying 4+1 View Architecture with UML 2

To provide the ability to specify CORBA physical components within a UML tool, the most appropriate approach is to create a UML profile that includes stereotypes, tagged values, and constraints that reflect the characteristics and requirements of CORBA components. Applying this profile to a UML model would extend the semantics of UML to support CORBA-specific concepts without modifying the UML metamodel itself. This approach allows the modeler to leverage the existing UML tooling while incorporating the additional semantics required for CORBA components. This practice is supported by the extensibility mechanisms provided by UML, as described in the UML 2.x Superstructure Specification, which outlines how to create and apply profiles.

In UML, profiles are applied to specific model elements to adapt the UML metamodel to different domains or platforms. The provided diagram shows a UML package diagram within which the «Versioning» profile is applied to the "Business Logic" package, and the «DBProfile» is applied to the "Data" package. This is a correct use of profiles in UML as they allow the customization of parts of a model by applying additional constraints and stereotypes to specific packages or classes. There is no restriction in UML that a profile cannot be applied to multiple packages in the model simultaneously, and profiles do not necessarily need to be members of the namespace of the model they are applied to; they can be defined externally. Therefore, the scenario presented is a correct application of two different profiles to two distinct packages within the same model, conforming to the UML 2.x Superstructure Specification.

The provided diagram fragment seems to indicate a situation involving a template. In UML, a template is a parameterizable element, and a bound element is a specific manifestation of that template wherein the parameters have been replaced with actual values or types. If 'List' is a template class, it cannot be directly used as a type. Instead, one must use a bound element of the List, meaning the template parameters of List must be bound to actual types before it can beused. For instance, if List is a template expecting a type T, then a concrete class might be List or List, where Customer or Order are actual types replacing the template parameter T. This use of templates and bound elements is according to the UML specification, which details how templates are defined and instantiated within UML models.