LLQP Exam Dumps - IFSE Institute Life License Qualification Program Questions and Answers

Since Arthur is the named beneficiary on Mercedes' life insurance policy, the death benefit will be payable to him directly. Under LLQP provisions, life insurance proceeds designated to a minor beneficiary are generally paid into a trust or managed by a legal guardian until the minor reaches the age of majority​.

In this case, because Mercedes died intestate (without a will), Arthur would still receive the proceeds of the life insurance policy as the sole named beneficiary. However, since he is a minor, the Director of Youth Protection or a legal guardian may be appointed to manage the funds until Arthur becomes of age​.

Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL) regulates the sending of commercial electronic messages (CEMs) without the recipient’s consent. CASL requires explicit consent before sending unsolicited promotional emails, even to friends and family, if the messages are for commercial purposes​. Clarence’s concern about compliance with CASL is valid, as sending unsolicited emails could result in penalties for violating this legislation.

PIPEDA and the Privacy Act relate to privacy and personal information protection but do not specifically address unsolicited electronic communications​.

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation with Exact Extract from Documents and Guides:

In insurance terminology, the policyholder (or policy owner) is the person or entity that owns the insurance contract and has the legal rights to make decisions about it, such as changing beneficiaries or cancelling the policy. TheIFSE Ethics and Professional Practice Course (Common Law)clearly distinguishes between the life insured (the person whose life is covered), the beneficiary (who receives the death benefit), and the policy owner. In this case, Edward and Shirley are explicitly designated as the joint owners of the policy, not merely premium payers. Christine, as the insured, has no ownership rights unless specified, and Edward’s status as beneficiary does not confer ownership. Paying premiums does not automatically make someone the policyholder unless they are also the designated owner. Therefore, option D is correct.

In Quebec, disability insurance benefits are generally protected from seizure by creditors. This protection is designed to ensure that disabled individuals retain access to essential income for their well-being during their period of disability. Since Paola’s benefits are designated as disability income, they are exempt from garnishment​​.

This aligns with Quebec's laws on disability and insurance benefits, which prioritize financial protection for individuals facing health-related work absences. Thus, her benefits remain protected, regardless of her tax status or existing debts​.

In group life insurance plans, the employee (insured individual) is typically responsible for designating their own beneficiary. Although Premier Vibe Inc. sponsors the group plan, it is Ae-Cha, as the policyholder, who has the right to choose her beneficiary for the life insurance coverage provided under the plan​​. The employer or the insurer does not decide the beneficiary; this decision remains solely with the insured employee.

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation with Exact Extract from Documents and Guides:

Disability insurance policies typically include a waiting period (also called an elimination period), which is the time between the onset of disability and when benefits begin. TheIFSE Ethics and Professional Practice Course (Common Law)notes that insurers require the date of disability onset—via an APS—to calculate this period (e.g., 30, 60, or 90 days). This ensures benefits are paid only after the waiting period elapses. A survival period (A) applies to life insurance, not disability. The incontestability period (B) relates to policy validity, not claimtiming. The grace period (C) pertains to premium payments. Knowing when Molly became disabled is critical for the waiting period, making D correct.

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation with Exact Extract from Documents and Guides:

TheCanadian Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL)governs the sending of commercial electronic messages (CEMs), such as emails or newsletters, to recipients in Canada. According to CASL, businesses must obtain consent—either express or implied—before sending CEMs to individuals. Since Bryan’s newsletter is a new initiative and none of the recipients have subscribed or requested it, Josh and Bryan lack consent, making CASL the primary law they must comply with. TheIFSE Ethics and Professional Practice Course (Common Law)highlights CASL under ethical businesspractices, noting that non-compliance can result in significant penalties. The Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) deals with the collection and use of personal information, not unsolicited messages specifically. The Privacy Act applies to federal government institutions, and the National Do Not Call List pertains to telemarketing calls, not emails. Thus, option B is correct.

In this scenario, the policy was accepted and delivered to Cassie by Mason before her biopsy, indicating that she was considered insurable at the time of application. However, the insurance policy is subject to a two-year contestability period, during which the insurer can investigate the claim if they believe relevant information regarding the insured’s health was omitted or misrepresented.

According to LLQP guidelines, insurance contracts are built on the principle of utmost good faith, requiring that both the client and the representative disclose all material facts that may affect the insurance risk. If the insured's health status changes significantly between the application and delivery of the policy, it is the representative's duty to inform the insurer to reassess the risk​​.

In this case, Mason, as the insurance representative, failed to disclose Cassie’s new health condition, which is considered a material change to her insurability. Under LLQP ethics and practice standards, non-disclosure of this change can result in the insurer denying the claim, as it affected the underwriting decision​​.

Therefore, due to the lack of disclosure by Mason, the insurance company would have grounds to deny the claim based on this material change in insurability, aligning with LLQP provisions and insurance contract law.

==============