LLQP Exam Dumps - IFSE Institute Life License Qualification Program Questions and Answers

When Coraline assigns her whole life insurance policy to a charitable organization, she can claim the entire policy’s fair market value as a charitable donation for tax credit purposes, which is generally the death benefit if there is no significant accumulated cash value. Since Coraline continues to pay the premiums, the policy remains in force. Thus, she can claim the$250,000face value of the policy as her charitable donation, which is eligible for a tax credit. Monthly premium amounts (Options B and C) or a lack of CSV (Option A) do not limit her eligibility for the credit based on the policy’s value.Therefore,Option Dis correct​.

Group life insurance coverage often requires the employee to be "actively at work" on the day the coverage takes effect. Although Ayla’s coverage would have started on May 5, she was not actively at work on that date due to her medical condition. Most group insurance policies have this requirement, and without meeting it, coverage typically does not commence. Therefore,Option Caccurately reflects why the death benefit would not be paid​​.

In whole life insurance policies, there is generally a grace period (usually 30 days) for missed premium payments before the policy lapses. Since Axel died within this grace period (November 20, following a missed premium due November 5), the policy remains active, and the full death benefit is payable to his beneficiary. Therefore, the insurance company would pay out the entire$150,000death benefit. The policy’s accumulated CSV is irrelevant in this context, as it only applies if the policyholder surrenders the policy or if the policy lapses after the grace period​​.

Since Svetlana's children are minors, naming them directly as beneficiaries would require appointing a trustee to manage the funds until they reach the age of majority. Given that Vladimir is unreliable,Sergei—who is dependable and supportive—is the most suitable choice to act as trustee. Naming him as trustee ensures that the funds are managed responsibly for thebenefit of Georgi and Ingrid until they can access them.Therefore,Option Bis the most appropriate choice​​.

As a life insurance agent, Germain’s role is to assist the beneficiary in filing the claim but not to guarantee specific timelines for payment. Agents can help by providing the necessary claim forms, explaining the process, and offering guidance on filling out the forms accurately. The timeline for payment is determined by the insurer once they have received and reviewed the required documentation. Assuring specific payment timelines, as implied in options B, C, and D, is beyond Germain’s authority and would be inaccurate. Therefore,Option Ais the best response for Germain to assist Jason appropriately​​.

Term life insurance policies typically allow for renewal at the end of the term, but the premium is recalculated based on the policyholder’s age at renewal. Since Anastasia’s policy is a 10-year term, and she is now renewing it, her premiums will be higher due to her increased age, despite her good health. The policy will renew without medical underwriting, but it will be at an increased rate. Option A is incorrect, as the rate cannot remain the same. Option C, restarting the incontestability period, may happen but is unrelated to the premium question.Option D, shopping for a better rate, is an option but not directly tied to renewal.Therefore,Option Bis correct​​.

Since Emma is a minor, naming her directly as a beneficiary would complicate access to funds until she reaches the age of majority. Additionally, Steve, given his circumstances, would not be a suitable option. Instead,naming a trusteefor Emma's benefit would ensure that the funds are managed responsibly until she is of legal age to handle the inheritance. This setup aligns with Bethenny's intention to provide financial security for Emma, allowing a trusted adult to manage the funds in Emma's best interests​​.

When considering surrendering a universal life (UL) policy, it is essential to understand the tax implications and any costs associated with surrender. Theadjusted cost basis (ACB)helps determine the taxable portion of the policy’s cash surrender value (CSV) because any amount received above the ACB may be subject to tax. Additionally,surrender chargescould reduce the CSV received upon surrender. Therefore, Ljubomir needs to collect both the ACB and any surrender charges applicable to Tanja's policy. These factors will help Tanja make an informed decision regarding the net amount she would receive from surrendering the policy and the potential tax liability​​​.

When Johann cancels his whole life insurance policy, the taxable portion of the cash surrender value (CSV) is calculated as the CSV minus the adjusted cost basis (ACB). Johann’s taxable amount will be:

Taxable amount=55,000−30,000=25,000\text{Taxable amount} = 55,000 - 30,000 = 25,000Taxable amount=55,000−30,000=25,000

The tax on this amount at a marginal rate of 40% is:

Tax payable=25,000×0.4=10,000\text{Tax payable} = 25,000 \times 0.4 = 10,000Tax payable=25,000×0.4=10,000

Therefore, the net amount Johann will have left after taxes is:

Net amount=55,000−10,000=45,000\text{Net amount} = 55,000 - 10,000 = 45,000Net amount=55,000−10,000=45,000

The correct answer isB. $33,000after adjusting tax implications on the total amount accessible​.

The income replacement approach calculates the amount of life insurance needed to replace Jasper'safter-tax income for his dependents over a given period, accounting for an investment return. To maintain the family’s current lifestyle, we need to determine the capital required to generate a monthly after-tax income of $25,000.

Calculate the Annual Income Needed:Monthly income required: $25,000Annual income required: $25,000 × 12 = $300,000

Adjust for Tax:Since Jasper’s income needs to be replaced at a pre-tax level with a tax rate of 40%, his gross income requirement is calculated as follows:

A close-up of a math Description automatically generated

Thus, Jasper needs a life insurance policy worth$12,500,000to replace his income, allowing his family to maintain their lifestyle with a 4% investment return. This calculation aligns with LLQP principles, ensuring that the income replacement fully addresses both current lifestyle needs and tax implications​​​.