JN0-683 Exam Dumps - Juniper JNCIP-DC Questions and Answers

Understanding the Configuration:

The exhibit shows configurations for two VRFs (Customer_A and Customer_B) with specific VLANs and VNIs assigned. Each VRF has interfaces (IRBs) associated with particular VLANs.

Communication Between VLANs and Routing Instances:

Option B:VLAN 400 (irb.400) is part of Customer_B, and there is no direct connection or routing between Customer_A and Customer_B in the configuration provided. Therefore, devices in irb.400 cannot communicate directly with devices in the Customer_A routing instance.

Option D:Since irb.400 (VLAN 400) and irb.800 (VLAN 800) are part of the same routing instance (Customer_B), they can communicate over the fabric using VXLAN encapsulation.

Conclusion:

Option B:Correct—There is no direct communication between devices in irb.400 (Customer_B) and routing instance Customer_A.

Option D:Correct—Devices in VLAN 400 and VLAN 800 can communicate within the Customer_B routing instance over the fabric.

Understanding EBGP in an IP Fabric:

EBGP (External Border Gateway Protocol) is commonly used in IP fabrics to establish peering between routers, such as leaf and spine nodes, without relying on an Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) like OSPF or IS-IS.

IGP Requirement for EBGP:

Option B:EBGP peering does not require an IGP for adjacency establishment. This is because EBGP peers are typically directly connected, and BGP establishes its own sessions without needing an underlying IGP.

Leaf-to-Spine Peering:

Option C:In a typical IP fabric, each leaf node establishes an EBGP session with every spine node. This ensures full connectivity between leaves and spines, facilitating efficient routing and forwarding within the fabric.

Conclusion:

Option B:Correct—EBGP does not require an IGP for establishing peering sessions.

Option C:Correct—Each leaf node peers with every spine node, which is a standard practice in IP fabrics to ensure connectivity and redundancy.

Symmetric vs. Asymmetric Routing in EVPN-VXLAN:

Symmetric Routing:Traffic enters and exits the VXLAN network through the same VTEP, regardless of the source or destination. This approach simplifies routing decisions, especially in large networks, and is generally more scalable.

Asymmetric Routing:The routing occurs on the egress VTEP. This method can be simpler to deploy in smaller environments but becomes complex as the network scales, particularly with larger numbers of VNIs and VLANs.

Correct Statements:

C. Symmetric routing supports higher scaling numbers:Symmetric routing is preferred in larger EVPN-VXLAN deployments because it centralizes routing decisions, which can be more easily managed and scaled.

D. Asymmetric routing routes traffic on the egress switch:This is accurate, as asymmetric routing means the routing decision is made at the final hop, i.e., the egress VTEP before the traffic reaches its destination.

Incorrect Statements:

A. Symmetric routing needs an extra VLAN with an IRB interface for each L3 VRF instance:This is not accurate. Symmetric routing does not require an extra VLAN per VRF; rather, it uses the same VLAN/VNI across the network, simplifying routing and VLAN management.

B. Asymmetric routing is easier to monitor because of the transit VNI:Asymmetric routing is not necessarily easier to monitor; in fact, it can add complexity due to the split routing logic between ingress and egress points.

Data Center References:

The choice between symmetric and asymmetric routing in an EVPN-VXLAN environment depends on network size, complexity, and specific operational requirements. Symmetric routing is generally more scalable and easier to manage in large-scale deployments.

Collapsed Fabric Architecture:

A collapsed fabric refers to a simplified architecture where the spine and leaf roles are combined, often reducing the number of devices and links required.

In this architecture, the spine typically handles core switching, while leaf switches handle both access and distribution roles.

Understanding Border Gateway Functionality:

Border gateway functions include connecting the data center to external networks or other data centers.

In a collapsed fabric, these functions are usually handled at the leaf level, particularly on border leaf devices that manage the ingress and egress of traffic to and from the data center fabric.

Correct Statement:

D. Border gateway functions occur on border leaf devices:This is accurate in collapsed fabric architectures, where the border leaf devices take on the role of managing external connections and handling routes to other data centers or the internet.

Data Center References:

The collapsed fabric model is advantageous in smaller deployments or scenarios where simplicity and cost-effectiveness are prioritized. It reduces complexity by consolidating functions into fewer devices, and the border leaf handles the critical task of interfacing with external networks.

In conclusion, border gateway functions are effectively managed at the leaf layer in collapsed fabric architectures, ensuring that the data center can communicate with external networks seamlessly.

Type 2 EVPN Routes:

Type 2 routesadvertise MAC addresses within an EVPN instance and are used primarily for Layer 2 bridging. These routes do not require a VXLAN tunnel to the protocol next hop because they operate within the same Layer 2 domain.

Type 5 EVPN Routes:

Type 5 routesare used to advertise IP prefixes (Layer 3 routes) within EVPN. Similar to Type 2 routes, they do not require a VXLAN tunnel to the protocol next hop because they represent L3 routes, which are managed at the routing layer without the need for VXLAN encapsulation.

Conclusion:

Option B:Correct—Type 2 routes do not need a VXLAN tunnel to the next hop, as they are used for Layer 2.

Option D:Correct—Type 5 routes also do not need a VXLAN tunnel because they operate at Layer 3, handling IP prefixes.

Understanding Oversubscription in a Clos Fabric:

The oversubscription ratio in a Clos IP fabric measures the ratio of the amount of edge (leaf) bandwidth to the core (spine) bandwidth. An oversubscription ratio of 3:1 means that there is three times more edge bandwidth compared to core bandwidth.

Impact of Adding/Removing Spine Devices:

Option C:If youremove spine devices, the total available core bandwidth decreases, while the edge bandwidth remains the same. This results in anincrease in the oversubscription ratiobecause there is now less core bandwidth to handle the same amount of edge traffic.

Option B:Conversely, if youadd spine devices, the total core bandwidth increases. This decreases the oversubscription ratio because more core bandwidth is available to handle the edge traffic.

Conclusion:

Option C:Correct—Removing spine devices increases the oversubscription ratio.

Option B:Correct—Adding spine devices decreases the oversubscription ratio.

Zero-Touch Provisioning (ZTP):

ZTP is a feature that allows for the automatic provisioning of devices with minimal manual intervention. It is widely used in large-scale deployments to quickly bring new devices online.

Key Requirements for ZTP:

A. DHCP Server:A DHCP server is crucial for ZTP as it provides the necessary information to new devices, such as the IP address, the location of the software image, and configuration files.

D. File Server:The file server is where the software image and configuration files are stored. The device downloads these files during the provisioning process.

Incorrect Options:

B. Syslog Server:While a syslog server is important for logging and monitoring, it is not a requirement for the initial provisioning process.

C. NTP Server:An NTP server is used for time synchronization, which is essential for accurate logging and operation but not specifically required for ZTP.

Data Center References:

ZTP simplifies the deployment process by automating the initial configuration steps, relying heavily on DHCP for communication and a file server for delivering the necessary configuration and software.

Clos IP Fabric Design:

A Clos fabric is a network topology designed for scalable, high-performance data centers. It is typically arranged in multiple stages, providing redundancy, high bandwidth, and low latency.

Three-Stage Clos Fabric:

Option B:A three-stage Clos fabric, consisting of leaf, spine, and super spine layers, is widely used in data centers. This design scales well and allows for easy expansion by adding more leaf and spine devices as needed.

Super Spines for Scalability:

Option D:Using high-capacity devices like the QFX5700 Series as super spines can handle the increased traffic demands in large data centers and support future growth. These devices provide the necessary bandwidth and scalability for large-scale deployments.

Conclusion:

Option B:Correct—A three-stage Clos fabric is a proven design that addresses growth and scalability concerns in large data centers.

Option D:Correct—QFX5700 Series devices are suitable for use as super spines in large-scale environments due to their high performance.

Understanding Multihomed CE-to-PE VXLAN Environment:

In a VXLAN environment using EVPN signaling, multiple PEs (Provider Edge devices) can be connected to the same CE (Customer Edge device). This setup is referred to as multihoming, where a CE device has multiple connections to the network to ensure redundancy and load balancing.

Role of the Designated Forwarder:

The designated forwarder (DF) is a mechanism used in EVPN to manage the forwarding of broadcast, unknown unicast, and multicast (BUM) traffic in a multihomed environment. The DF is selected to ensure that only one of the PEs forwards this type of traffic to the CE, preventing loops and unnecessary duplicate packets.

Avoiding Duplicate Packets:

Without a designated forwarder, all PEs connected to a multihomed CE could potentially forward the same packet to the CE, resulting in duplicate packets. This duplication can cause issues with packet processing on the CE, leading to inefficiencies and potential network problems.

Conclusion:

Option D:Correct—The designated forwarder is essential to prevent duplicate packets from being received on multihomed hosts, ensuring that only one PE forwards BUM traffic to the CE.

Controlling Traffic Within a Tenant's Network:

The requirement is to limit access to specific traffic types within a tenant’s network without routing all tenant traffic through a firewall. This requires a selective method that can direct specific types of traffic to different paths based on the nature of the traffic.

Filter-Based Forwarding (FBF):

FBF is a technique that allows for routing decisions based on filters applied to the traffic, such as matching on source IP addresses, destination IP addresses, or even specific application types (like HTTP or FTP). This allows specific types of traffic to be forwardedto a specific next hop (e.g., a firewall) without affecting the entire traffic flow within the tenant's network.

Conclusion:

Option B:Correct—Filter-based forwarding allows for granular control of traffic, ensuring that only specific types of traffic within the tenant's network are redirected through a firewall, satisfying the requirement.