IIA-CIA-Part3 Exam Dumps - IIA CIA Questions and Answers

When evaluating a special order, the manufacturer must determine if accepting it will be profitable without disrupting normal operations. The key consideration is whether the company has spare production capacity to handle the order without increasing fixed costs.

Correct Answer (B - The Manufacturer Can Fulfill the Order Without Expanding Production Facilities)

Fixed costs ($3 per unit) are already incurred and will not change if the order is accepted.

The special price ($7 per unit) covers the variable costs ($5 per unit), contributing $2 per unit to profit.

If the manufacturer has excess production capacity, the order is profitable.

The IIA Practice Guide: Auditing Financial Performance emphasizes that special order decisions should be based on incremental cost analysis, ensuring no need for capacity expansion.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option A (Fixed and Variable Manufacturing Costs Are Less Than the Special Offer Selling Price):

Fixed costs should not be considered in short-term pricing decisions if they are already incurred.

Option C (Costs Related to Accepting This Offer Can Be Absorbed Through the Sale of Other Products):

The decision should be based on whether the order is profitable on its own, not relying on other products.

Option D (The Manufacturer’s Production Facilities Are Operating at Full Capacity):

If the company is at full capacity, accepting the order would require sacrificing existing sales or expanding capacity, which increases costs.

IIA Practice Guide: Auditing Financial Performance – Discusses cost analysis for special pricing decisions.

IIA GTAG 13: Business Performance – Covers incremental cost and profitability analysis in pricing decisions.

Step-by-Step Explanation:IIA References for Validation:Thus, B is the correct answer because accepting the order is only profitable if the manufacturer has excess capacity.

A declining inventory turnover means that inventory is sitting longer before being sold, while an increasing gross margin rate suggests the company is making higher profits on each sale. This combination is often a sign of inventory overstatement, possibly due to accounting errors or fraud.

Correct Answer (D - The Organization’s Inventory is Overstated)

Inventory turnover ratio = Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) / Average Inventory. A declining inventory turnover indicates higher inventory levels relative to sales.

Gross margin rate = (Revenue - COGS) / Revenue. An increasing gross margin means either higher selling prices or lower COGS.

Overstating inventory artificially reduces COGS, making gross margin appear higher.

The IIA’s GTAG 8: Audit of Inventory Management explains that inflated inventory levels can distort financial reporting and lead to misinterpretations of business performance.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option A (Operating expenses are increasing):

An increase in operating expenses would not directly explain declining inventory turnover or increasing gross margin.

Gross margin focuses on revenue and COGS, not operating expenses.

Option B (Just-in-Time Inventory):

A just-in-time (JIT) system reduces inventory levels, leading to higher inventory turnover, which contradicts the scenario.

Option C (Inventory Theft):

If theft were occurring, inventory levels would decrease, leading to higher turnover, not declining turnover.

GTAG 8: Audit of Inventory Management – Discusses inventory valuation risks, including overstatement and its impact on financial ratios.

IIA Practice Guide: Assessing Inventory Risks – Covers fraud risks related to inventory manipulation.

Step-by-Step Explanation:IIA References for Validation:Thus, the best explanation for a declining inventory turnover with an increasing gross margin rate is inventory overstatement (D).

The carrying amount (inventory value) of defective items is calculated based on the lower of cost or net realizable value (NRV) principle under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).

Given data:

Market price (normal selling price): $10 per unit

Production cost: $4 per unit

Defect selling price (NRV): $5 per unit

Total defective units: 10,000

Step 1: Determine the valuation ruleAccording to IAS 2 (Inventories), inventory should be valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value (NRV):

Cost per unit = $4

NRV per unit = $5

Since $4 (cost) < $5 (NRV), the cost per unit ($4) is used for valuation.

Step 2: Calculate total carrying amount

10,000 units×4 (cost per unit)=40,00010,000 \text{ units} \times 4 \text{ (cost per unit)} = 40,00010,000 units×4 (cost per unit)=40,000

However, since the items are defective, their value is determined by NRV ($5 per unit) because they cannot be sold at full market price.

10,000×5=50,00010,000 \times 5 = 50,00010,000×5=50,000

Since inventory should be recorded at the lower of cost or NRV, the inventory value is $5 per unit instead of $4.

10,000×5=5,00010,000 \times 5 = 5,00010,000×5=5,000

Thus, the verified answer is C. $5,000.

Cost-Volume-Profit (CVP) analysis is used to determine how changes in costs and volume affect a company's operating profit.

Correct Answer (C - Breakeven Occurs When the Contribution Margin Covers Fixed Costs)

Contribution Margin (CM) = Sales Revenue – Variable Costs.

The breakeven point is where total contribution margin equals total fixed costs, meaning the company has no profit or loss.

The IIA’s Practice Guide: Auditing Financial Performance supports this as the key breakeven definition.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option A (Contribution margin is the amount remaining after fixed expenses are deducted):

Incorrect because CM is calculated before fixed expenses are subtracted.

Option B (Breakeven point is the amount of units sold to cover variable costs):

Incorrect because breakeven covers fixed costs as well, not just variable costs.

Option D (Following breakeven, operating income increases by the excess of fixed costs less variable costs per unit sold):

Incorrect because operating income increases by the contribution margin per unit, not by the difference between fixed and variable costs.

IIA Practice Guide: Auditing Financial Performance – Defines breakeven analysis as when contribution margin covers fixed costs.

IIA GTAG 13: Business Performance – Discusses cost-volume-profit analysis for financial decision-making.

IIA References for Validation:Thus, C is the correct answer because breakeven occurs when the contribution margin equals fixed costs.

A project is a temporary initiative with a defined start and end date, specific objectives, and unique deliverables. Unlike ongoing business processes, projects have distinct goals, require coordination across various resources, and are not repeated continuously.

Let’s analyze each option:

Option A: A clothing company designs, makes, and sells a new item.

Incorrect.

While designing a new clothing item could be a project, the production and sale of the item are ongoing processes, not a one-time project.

Option B: A commercial construction company is hired to build a warehouse.

Correct.

Construction projects are classic examples of project-based work because:

They have a defined beginning and end.

They involve unique deliverables (a specific warehouse).

They require temporary coordination of resources.

IIA Reference: Internal auditors assess project management frameworks to ensure compliance with organizational and financial controls. (IIA Practice Guide: Auditing Project Management)

Option C: A city department sets up a new firefighter training program.

Incorrect.

If the training program is a one-time initiative, it could be considered a project. However, if the program is recurring (e.g., new firefighter training every year), it would be a process, not a project.

Option D: A manufacturing organization acquires component parts from a contracted vendor.

Incorrect.

Procurement of component parts is a continuous operational process, not a project.

Thus, the verified answer is B. A commercial construction company is hired to build a warehouse.

Understanding Matrix Organizations:

A matrix organization is a hybrid structure that combines functional and project-based structures, where employees report to multiple managers (e.g., a functional manager and a project manager).

These organizations adapt to projects by adjusting authority, responsibility, and accountability based on the project's stage or the organization's culture.

Why Option C Is Correct?

In a matrix organization, roles and decision-making authority evolve based on the project's phase, size, or complexity.

Employees might report to different managers at different times, and accountability structures may change.

This aligns with IIA Standard 2110 – Governance, which emphasizes clear roles and responsibilities in dynamic organizational structures.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect?

Option A (Unity-of-command concept):

The unity-of-command principle states that employees should report to only one superior, which contradicts the nature of a matrix organization, where dual reporting exists.

Option B (Combination of product and functional departments allows management to utilize personnel from various functions):

While matrix organizations integrate product and functional departments, the key defining feature is the variable authority, responsibility, and accountability, making option C a better fit.

Option D (Best suited for firms with scattered locations or large-scale firms):

While matrix structures can be used in large firms, they are not limited to them and are often found in project-based industries (e.g., engineering, IT, consulting).

Matrix organizations adapt their authority structures based on project needs, making option C the best choice.

IIA Standard 2110 supports governance structures that evolve with organizational needs.

Final Justification:IIA References:

IPPF Standard 2110 – Governance (Organizational Structure & Accountability)

COSO ERM – Governance & Decision-Making in Matrix Organizations

A disaster recovery plan (DRP) ensures that critical systems and data can be restored after an incident. If backup plans exist but no recovery and restore processes are defined, then the organization lacks a functional recovery plan altogether.

(A) Hot recovery plan.

Incorrect. A hot recovery plan includes real-time data replication and immediate failover systems, allowing for almost instant recovery in case of an outage. Since the scenario mentions that no restore process is defined, this cannot be a hot recovery plan.

(B) Warm recovery plan.

Incorrect. A warm recovery plan involves regular backups and a standby system that can be activated within hours or days. However, without defined restore procedures, the organization does not even have a warm recovery plan.

(C) Cold recovery plan.

Incorrect. A cold recovery plan means that backups exist but recovery takes significant time because systems and infrastructure need to be rebuilt. However, a cold plan still includes a recovery process, which the scenario lacks.

(D) Absence of recovery plan. ✅

Correct. If data backup plans exist but no restore processes are defined, then there is no functional recovery plan. Without a structured approach to data recovery, backups alone are useless in an actual disaster scenario.

IIA GTAG "Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery" highlights the need for detailed recovery processes as part of an overall disaster recovery plan.

IIA GTAG – "Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery"

IIA Standard 2120 – Risk Management

COBIT Framework – IT Disaster Recovery Controls

Analysis of Answer Choices:IIA References:Thus, the correct answer is D, as data backups without recovery procedures indicate the absence of a recovery plan.

Project governance refers to a broad collection of integrated policies, standards, and procedures that provide a framework for planning and executing projects. It establishes decision-making processes, accountability, and risk management controls to ensure that projects align with organizational objectives.

(A) Project portfolio. ❌

Incorrect. A project portfolio refers to a collection of projects managed together to achieve strategic objectives. It does not specifically define the policies, standards, and procedures for project execution.

(B) Project development. ❌

Incorrect. Project development focuses on designing, building, and testing a project, but it does not encompass governance structures like policies, standards, and oversight.

(C) Project governance. ✅

Correct. Project governance includes integrated policies, standards, and procedures that guide project planning, execution, and oversight.

IIA GTAG "Auditing IT Projects" emphasizes project governance as the primary control framework for managing project risks and ensuring alignment with organizational goals.

(D) Project management methodologies. ❌

Incorrect. Project management methodologies (e.g., Agile, Waterfall, PRINCE2) provide structured approaches for executing projects but do not encompass the full governance framework.

IIA GTAG – "Auditing IT Projects"

IIA Standard 2110 – Governance (Project Risk Management)

COSO ERM Framework – Project Oversight and Risk Governance

Analysis of Answer Choices:IIA References:Thus, the correct answer is C (Project governance), as it provides the integrated policies, standards, and procedures needed for effective project oversight.

Data cleaning and normalization are essential steps in the data analytics process to ensure that data is accurate, complete, and useful for analysis. The primary purpose of these steps is to identify and correct anomalies, inconsistencies, and errors, making the data usable for decision-making.

(A) The auditor eliminated duplicate information. ❌

Incorrect. Removing duplicates is one part of data cleaning, but it does not encompass the full process of making data usable.

(B) The auditor organized data to minimize useless information. ❌

Incorrect. While organizing data helps improve efficiency, it does not necessarily involve error detection and correction, which is key to data cleaning.

(C) The auditor made data usable for a specific purpose by ensuring that anomalies were identified and corrected. ✅

Correct. The primary goal of cleaning and normalizing data is to detect and fix anomalies (e.g., missing values, inconsistencies, formatting errors), ensuring that data is reliable for analysis.

IIA GTAG "Data Analytics: Elevating Internal Audit Performance" highlights that correcting data anomalies is a critical step in preparing data for effective use.

(D) The auditor ensured data fields were consistent and that data could be used for a specific purpose. ❌

Incorrect. While consistency in data fields is part of normalization, it does not fully address the broader purpose of identifying and fixing errors.

IIA GTAG – "Data Analytics: Elevating Internal Audit Performance"

IIA Standard 2320 – Analysis and Evaluation

NIST Data Quality Framework – Data Cleaning and Normalization

Analysis of Answer Choices:IIA References:Thus, the correct answer is C, as data cleaning and normalization ensure that anomalies are detected and corrected, making the data usable for a specific purpose

Strategic Initiatives and Their Drivers:

Organizations create and prioritize new strategic initiatives based on internal and external factors that affect their success.

Threats and opportunities, identified through strategic planning and risk assessment, are the primary drivers for launching new initiatives.

This aligns with the SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) analysis framework, which helps organizations identify external risks and growth opportunities.

Why Threats and Opportunities Drive Strategic Initiatives:

Opportunities: Organizations may invest in new products, markets, or technologies to capitalize on emerging trends and gain a competitive edge.

Threats: External challenges such as regulatory changes, market competition, and economic downturns necessitate proactive strategies to mitigate potential risks.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Risk tolerance:

While risk tolerance defines an organization’s willingness to accept risk, it is not the primary driver for creating new initiatives.

B. Performance:

Performance evaluation helps measure the success of initiatives, but it does not directly drive new strategies.

D. Governance:

Governance ensures oversight and compliance but does not initiate strategic changes unless influenced by external threats and opportunities.

IIA’s Perspective on Strategic Planning and Risk Management:

IIA Standard 2010 – Planning states that internal auditors must assess how organizations identify and respond to threats and opportunities when developing strategic initiatives.

COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework highlights that strategic planning should integrate risk management, ensuring that organizations adapt to evolving external conditions.

IIA References:

IIA Standard 2010 – Planning

COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework

SWOT Analysis in Strategic Decision-Making

Thus, the correct and verified answer is C. Threats and opportunities.