HPE7-A02 Exam Dumps - HP Certification Questions and Answers

In HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Device Insight (CPDI), a device with a Risk Score of 90 indicates that the posture is unhealthy, and CPDI has detected at least one vulnerability on the device. The risk score is a reflection of the device's security posture and detected vulnerabilities. A high risk score, such as 90, typically signifies significant security concerns, including the presence of vulnerabilities that could be exploited, thereby categorizing the device as a high-risk asset within the network.

Zero Trust Security is a security model that operates on the principle that no entity, whether inside or outside the network, should be trusted by default. Instead, every access request is thoroughly verified before granting access to resources. This model emphasizes protecting resources rather than merely securing the network perimeter, acknowledging that threats can originate both inside and outside the network.

1.Resource Protection: Zero Trust focuses on securing individual resources, assuming that threats can bypass traditional perimeter defenses.

2.Verification: Every access request is authenticated and authorized regardless of the source, ensuring that only legitimate users can access sensitive resources.

3.Modern Security Approach: This model aligns with the evolving threat landscape where insider threats and advanced persistent threats are common.

To minimize disruption time if an AOS-CX switch reboots while implementing DHCP snooping and ARP inspection, you should save the IP-to-MAC bindings to external storage. This ensures that the DHCP snooping and ARP inspection tables, which are crucial for preventing spoofing attacks, are preserved across reboots. When the switch restarts, it can reload these bindings from the external storage, thereby maintaining network security and reducing the downtime associated with rebuilding these tables.

1.Preserving Bindings: Saving IP-to-MAC bindings to external storage ensures that these critical security tables are not lost during a reboot, maintaining network integrity.

2.Security Continuity: This practice helps to quickly restore security features like DHCP snooping and ARP inspection, minimizing the window of vulnerability.

3.Operational Efficiency: By preserving these bindings, the switch can resume normal operations faster, reducing disruption to network services.

When establishing a cluster of HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass servers, it is recommended to install a CA-signed certificate for HTTPS on the Subscriber before it joins the cluster. This ensures secure communication between the servers in the cluster and provides a trusted certificate for client connections.

1.HTTPS Security: A CA-signed certificate for HTTPS ensures that all web-based communication to and from the ClearPass server is encrypted and secure.

2.Cluster Communication: Secure communication between ClearPass nodes in the cluster is essential for synchronization and data integrity.

3.Client Trust: Clients accessing the ClearPass server will trust the CA-signed certificate, avoiding security warnings and ensuring smooth operations.

To show the security team information about MAC spoofing attempts detected by HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM), you should use ClearPass Insight to run an Active Endpoint Security report. ClearPass Insight provides comprehensive reporting capabilities that include detailed information on security incidents, such as MAC spoofing attempts. By generating this report, you can provide the security team with a clear overview of the detected spoofing activities, including the endpoints involved and the context of the events.

Gateway Threat Count Alert

This alert indicates that the gateway has detected threats in traffic passing through it. HPE Aruba Networking Central provides tools to investigate and analyze these threats in detail.

Analysis of Each Option

A. Use HPE Aruba Networking Central tools to run a Network Check on the gateway with which the alert is associated:

Incorrect:

Network Check tools in Central are primarily used for connectivity and performance diagnostics, not for analyzing detected threats.

This does not provide insight into the specific threats triggering the Gateway Threat Count alert.

B. Use Live Monitoring on the gateway to download a packet capture of recent traffic flowing through the gateway:

Incorrect:

Live Monitoring and packet capture can provide raw traffic data, but interpreting this requires significant manual analysis.

The Gateway Threat Count alert already provides summarized threat insights that are easier to access via the threat list.

C. Check the threat list for the gateway associated with the alert. Access threat details and download packet info:

Correct:

The threat list is specifically designed to display detailed information about detected threats, such as their type, severity, and source/destination.

Administrators can access this list in Central for the affected gateway, view granular details, and even download associated packet data for deeper inspection.

D. Check the gateway's Audit Trail in HPE Aruba Networking Central for more details about the threats that triggered the alert:

Incorrect:

The Audit Trail tracks configuration changes and administrative actions, not the details of detected threats.

It is not relevant for investigating the Gateway Threat Count alert.

Final Recommendation

To gather more information about what caused the Gateway Threat Count alert to trigger, check the threat list for the associated gateway. This provides detailed threat information and the option to download packet data for further analysis.

References

HPE Aruba Networking Central Threat Management Guide.

Understanding Gateway IDS/IPS Alerts in Aruba Central Documentation.

Best Practices for Threat Investigation Using Aruba Central.

When Wireless IDS/IPS infrastructure detection reports RTS (Request to Send) and CTS (Clear to Send) rate anomalies triggered by neighboring APs, it is often an indication of unusual, but not necessarily malicious, behavior. These anomalies can be caused by neighboring APs operating normally but under specific conditions that trigger the alerts. Before assuming a security threat, it is recommended to tune the event thresholds to better match the environment and reduce false positives. This approach helps to distinguish between normal operations and potential DoS attacks.

1. Understanding the Role Mapping Evaluation:

Role mapping is set to "Evaluate: Select first," meaning the first rule that matches the client attributes will determine the role(s) assigned.

Contractors group: Since the client is in the Contractors group (not Managers), Rule 1 in the Role Mapping Policy does not match.

TEAP-Method-1-Status EQUALS Success: This condition matches Rule 2, so the client is assigned the domain-comp role.

No other rules match, so the default role [Other] is not applied.

2. Resulting Role from Role Mapping Policy:

The client is assigned the domain-comp role.

3. Enforcement Policy Evaluation:

Enforcement policy is also set to "Evaluate: Select first," so the first matching rule determines the enforcement profile.

Rule 1 (Tips Role = manager AND domain-comp):

The client only has the domain-comp role, not manager, so this rule does not match.

Rule 2 (Tips Role = manager):

The client does not have the manager role, so this rule does not match.

Rule 3 (Tips Role = domain-comp):

This rule matches the client's role, but it is not evaluated because the enforcement policy already skipped to the default action after failing the first two rules.

4. Default Enforcement Profile:

Since no rule explicitly matches and the policy evaluation stops at the default, the default profile [Deny Access Profile] is applied.

Final Outcome:

The client is denied access because none of the matching rules satisfy the conditions.

References

Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager Role Mapping and Enforcement Policies Guide.

Role and Policy Evaluation Logic for ClearPass Authentication Services.

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation

To prohibit users from uploading and downloading files from Dropbox using HPE Aruba Networking SSE (Secure Service Edge), you need to configure web access policies. This typically involves:

Adding a web category to the SSE configuration that includes Dropbox.

The SSE solution uses category-based filtering to block access to specific applications or services, such as Dropbox, based on their classification.

Other Options:

B. Installing the SSE root certificate is required for enabling SSL inspection, but this does not directly control access to Dropbox.

C and D. Deploying a connector is not necessary for this purpose as the enforcement is done via SSE policies, not by directly interfacing with Dropbox or remote users.

References

Aruba Networking SSE documentation on web filtering policies.

HPE Aruba SSE Application Control Best Practices Guide.

The "Detect Valid SSID Misuse" event in Aruba's Wireless Intrusion Detection System (WIDS) indicates that a valid SSID, associated with your network, is being broadcast from an unauthorized source. This scenario often signals a potential rogue access point attempting to deceive clients into connecting to it (e.g., for credential harvesting or man-in-the-middle attacks).

1. Explanation of Each Option

A. Clients are failing to authenticate to corporate SSIDs. You should first check for misconfigured authentication settings and then investigate a possible threat:

Incorrect:

This event is not related to authentication failures by legitimate clients.

Misconfigured authentication settings would lead to events like "authentication failures" or "radius issues," not "valid SSID misuse."

B. Admins have likely misconfigured SSID security settings on some of the company's APs. You should have them check those settings:

Incorrect:

This event refers to an external device broadcasting your SSID, not misconfiguration on the company’s authorized APs.

WIDS differentiates between valid corporate APs and rogue APs.

C. Hackers are likely trying to pose as authorized APs. You should use the detecting radio information and immediately track down the device that triggered the event:

Correct:

This is the most likely cause of the "detect valid SSID misuse" event. A rogue AP broadcasting a corporate SSID could lure clients into connecting to it, exposing sensitive credentials or traffic.

Immediate action includes:

Using the radio information from the event logs to identify the rogue AP's location.

Physically locating and removing the rogue device.

Strengthening WIPS/WIDS policies to prevent further misuse.

D. This event might be a threat but is almost always a false positive. You should wait to see the event over several days before following up on it:

Incorrect:

While false positives are possible, "valid SSID misuse" is a critical security event that should not be ignored.

Delaying action increases the risk of successful attacks against your network.

2. Recommended Steps to Address the Event

Review Event Logs:

Gather details about the rogue AP, such as SSID, MAC address, channel, and signal strength.

Locate the Rogue Device:

Use the detecting AP's radio information and signal strength to triangulate the rogue AP's physical location.

Respond to the Threat:

Remove or disable the rogue device.

Notify the security team for further investigation.

Prevent Future Misuse:

Strengthen security policies, such as enabling client whitelists or enhancing WIPS protection.

References

Aruba WIDS/WIPS Configuration and Best Practices Guide.

Aruba Central Security Event Analysis Documentation.

Wireless Threat Management Using Aruba Networks.