FCP_FAZ_AN-7.4 Exam Dumps - Fortinet Security Operations Questions and Answers

In the exhibit, the playbook configuration shows the analyst working with the "Attach Data" action within a playbook. Here’s a breakdown of key aspects:

Incident ID: This field is linked to the "Playbook Starter," which indicates that the playbook will attach data to an existing incident.

Attachment: The analyst is configuring an attachment by selecting Run_REPORT with a placeholder ID for report_uuid. This suggests that the report’s UUID will dynamically populate as part of the playbook execution.

Analysis of Options:

Option A - Creating a Trigger Variable:

A trigger variable would typically be set up in the playbook starter or initiation configuration, not within the "Attach Data" action. The setup here does not indicate a trigger, as it’s focusing on data attachment.

Conclusion: Incorrect.

Option B - Creating an Output Variable:

The field Attachment with a report_uuid placeholder suggests that the analyst is defining an output variable that will store the report data or ID, allowing it to be attached to the incident. This variable can then be referenced or passed within the playbook for further actions or reporting.

Conclusion: Correct.

Option C - Creating a Report in the Playbook:

While Run_REPORT is selected, it appears to be an attachment action rather than a report generation task. The purpose here is to attach an existing or dynamically generated report to an incident, not to create the report itself.

Conclusion: Incorrect.

Option D - Creating a SOC Report:

Similarly, this configuration is focused on attaching data, not specifically generating a SOC report. SOC reports are generally predefined and generated outside the playbook.

Conclusion: Incorrect.

Conclusion:

Correct Answer: B. The analyst is trying to create an output variable to be used in the playbook.

The setup allows the playbook to dynamically assign the report_uuid as an output variable, which can then be used in further actions within the playbook.

References:

FortiAnalyzer 7.4.1 documentation on playbook configurations, output variables, and data attachment functionalities.

Enabling auto-cache in FortiAnalyzer reports is designed to improve the efficiency and speed of report generation by leveraging cached data. Let’s analyze each option to determine which effects are correct.

Option A - The Generation Time for Reports is Decreased:

When auto-cache is enabled, FortiAnalyzer can use previously cached data instead of reprocessing all log data from scratch each time a report is generated. This results in faster report generation times, especially for recurring reports that use similar datasets.

Conclusion: Correct.

Option B - Hard-Cache Data is Automatically Updated When New Logs are Received:

Enabling auto-cache does not immediately update the cache with every new log received. Instead, the cache is updated when reports are generated, based on the existing logs up to that point. Therefore, auto-cache does not constantly refresh with each incoming log, which would be inefficient.

Conclusion: Incorrect.

Option C - FortiAnalyzer Local Cache is Used to Store Generated Reports:

Auto-cache utilizes FortiAnalyzer’s local cache to store data used in reports, reducing the need to retrieve and process logs repeatedly. This cached data can be reused for subsequent report generation, enhancing performance.

Conclusion: Correct.

Option D - The Size of Newly Generated Reports is Optimized to Conserve Disk Space:

Auto-cache does not directly impact the size of the report files themselves. It focuses on performance optimization through cached data for faster access, but it does not compress or optimize the storage size of the generated report.

Conclusion: Incorrect.

Conclusion:

Correct Answer: A. The generation time for reports is decreased and C. FortiAnalyzer local cache is used to store generated reports.

Enabling auto-cache helps reduce report generation time by using locally cached data and optimizes report processing, though it does not impact report size or continuously update with each new log.

References:

FortiAnalyzer 7.4.1 documentation on report caching, auto-cache functionality, and report generation optimizations.

In FortiOS and FortiAnalyzer logging systems, when an event has a status of "Mitigated" in the Event Status column, it typically indicates that the system took action to address the identified threat. In this case, the Web Filter blocked the web request to a suspicious destination, and the event status "Mitigated" confirms that the action was successfully implemented to neutralize or block the security risk.

Let's review the answer options:

Option A: The risk source is isolated.

This is incorrect because "isolated" would imply that FortiGate took further steps to prevent the source device from communicating with the network. There is no indication of isolation in this event status.

Option B: The security risk was blocked or dropped.

This is correct. The "Mitigated" status, along with the Web Filter event type and the accompanying description, implies that the FortiGate or FortiAnalyzer successfully blocked or dropped the suspicious web request, which corresponds to the term "mitigated."

Option C: The security event risk is considered open.

This is incorrect because an open status would indicate that no action was taken, or the threat is still present. The "Mitigated" status indicates that the threat has been addressed.

Option D: An incident was created from this event.

This option is not correct or evident based on the given display. Although FortiAnalyzer or FortiGate could escalate certain events to incidents, this is not indicated here.

References:

The FortiOS 7.4.1 and FortiAnalyzer 7.4.1 documentation specify that "Mitigated" status in logs means the identified threat was handled, usually by blocking or dropping the action associated with the event, particularly with Web Filter and Security Policy logs​.