TMMi-P_Syll2.1 Leak Questions

The statement that Specific Goal 1 of the Test Measurement (4.1) process area covers the communication of test measurement results after analysis is FALSE. Specific Goal 1 focuses on aligning test measurement and analysis activities, which involves setting measurement objectives, specifying the measures to be taken, and establishing procedures for data collection, storage, and analysis. However, the communication of results comes under Specific Goal 2, which deals with the analysis and reporting of test measurement results.

TMMi References:

Test Measurement at TMMi Level 4 includes defining measures, data collection, and storage as part of aligning test measurement and analysis activities, while communicating results is part of a different goal​​.

The absence of a master test plan spanning multiple test levels points to a weakness in the Test Lifecycle and Integration process area, which is a TMMi Level 3 process area. This process area focuses on ensuring that testing is integrated throughout the development lifecycle and includes the development of comprehensive test plans (including master test plans) that cover multiple test levels and align with the overall testing strategy.

TMMi References:

The Test Lifecycle and Integration process area at TMMi Level 3 addresses the need for comprehensive and integrated test planning across all test levels​​.

Planning poker is an Agile technique commonly used to estimate effort, and it can be adapted for use in the Test Planning process area to help estimate test efforts (SG3: Establish Test Estimates). This collaborative technique brings stakeholders together to estimate the effort required for tasks by assigning numerical values in a consensus-driven manner. It is particularly effective in Agile environments where estimation is iterative and frequently updated based on evolving project needs​.

Informal assessments, as described in the TMMi framework, are often quicker and cheaper as they do not require the extensive corroboration of evidence that formal assessments do. One key characteristic of informal assessments is that they may rely solely on interviews, without using other forms of corroboration such as documentation reviews or observations. These informal assessments provide an indicative view of the organization's maturity level but do not result in formal certification​