Exactprep ESG-Investing Questions

A reason for concern regarding the quality of a company's ESG disclosures would be if competitors have stronger disclosure standards. This indicates that the company may be lagging in transparency and accountability compared to its peers, potentially hiding risks or missing opportunities to improve ESG performance. While audited data and commitments to future improvements are positive signs, lagging behind competitors is a significant red flag​​​​.

Individual engagement refers to direct and personal interactions between investors and companies. Informal discussions are a form of individual engagement where investors engage directly with company representatives to discuss specific concerns, insights, or feedback related to ESG issues.

Direct Interaction: Informal discussions involve direct communication between the investor and the company. This can be through meetings, phone calls, or casual conversations, providing a platform for open and candid dialogue.

Specific and Personalized: These discussions are tailored to the specific company and the investor’s concerns. Unlike generic letters, which are broad and non-specific, informal discussions allow for detailed and nuanced conversations.

Relationship Building: Informal discussions help build and strengthen relationships between investors and company representatives. This can lead to more effective communication and collaboration on ESG matters.

References:

MSCI ESG Ratings Methodology (2022) - Highlights the importance of direct engagement and relationship building in effective ESG integration​​.

ESG-Ratings-Methodology-Exec-Summary (2022) - Discusses various forms of engagement, emphasizing the value of personalized and informal interactions​​.

Jurisdictions are most likely to impose extraterritorial laws in relation to bribery and corruption. Extraterritorial laws are those that have legal force beyond the borders of the issuing country, and they are often applied to combat global issues such as corruption.

Global Standards: Countries impose extraterritorial laws to ensure that their nationals and corporations comply with anti-bribery and anti-corruption standards, regardless of where they operate. This helps maintain ethical business practices internationally.

Regulatory Frameworks: Prominent examples of extraterritorial laws include the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and the UK Bribery Act, which apply to activities conducted abroad by U.S. and UK entities, respectively. These laws aim to prevent and penalize bribery and corruption on a global scale.

Enforcement and Compliance: By implementing extraterritorial anti-corruption laws, jurisdictions can enforce compliance and hold companies accountable for corrupt practices in foreign countries, promoting transparency and integrity in international business.

References:

MSCI ESG Ratings Methodology (2022) - Discusses the role of extraterritorial laws in combating bribery and corruption and their impact on global business practices​​.

ESG-Ratings-Methodology-Exec-Summary (2022) - Highlights the significance of extraterritorial regulations in maintaining ethical standards and preventing corruption in international operations​​.

With respect to the current state of ESG disclosure globally, issuer reporting frameworks for ESG information are fragmented. There is a lack of uniformity and consistency in how companies report ESG data, leading to challenges for investors and other stakeholders.

Diverse Standards: Multiple frameworks and standards exist for ESG reporting, such as GRI (Global Reporting Initiative), SASB (Sustainability Accounting Standards Board), and TCFD (Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures). Each framework has its own set of guidelines, leading to inconsistencies in reporting.

Regional Differences: ESG disclosure requirements vary significantly across regions and countries. Some regions have mandatory reporting requirements, while others rely on voluntary disclosures, contributing to the fragmentation.

Comparability Issues: The lack of harmonization in ESG reporting makes it difficult for investors to compare ESG performance across companies and sectors. This fragmentation poses challenges in assessing and integrating ESG factors into investment decisions.

References:

MSCI ESG Ratings Methodology (2022) - Discusses the fragmented nature of ESG disclosure frameworks and the impact on data comparability and investor decision-making​​.

ESG-Ratings-Methodology-Exec-Summary (2022) - Highlights the challenges posed by diverse and fragmented ESG reporting standards globally​​.