CDMP-RMD Exam Dumps - DAMA CDMP Questions and Answers

Several factors can deter a company from developing a master data program, including the perceived value, commitment level, disruption, and data quality priorities.

Fail to See Value in Integrating Their Data:

If a company does not recognize the benefits of integrating and managing master data, it may not invest in an MDM program.

Lack of Commitment:

Developing an effective MDM program requires long-term commitment from leadership and stakeholders. Without this commitment, the program is unlikely to succeed.

The Process is Too Disruptive:

Implementing an MDM program can be disruptive to existing processes and systems. The perceived disruption can deter companies from pursuing it.

Data Quality is Not a Priority:

If a company does not prioritize data quality, it may not see the need for a robust MDM program. Poor data quality can undermine the effectiveness of business processes and decision-making.

The centralized style is the easiest MDM style to implement data governance because it consolidates all master data into a single central repository. This centralization simplifies the application of data governance controls, ensuring consistent data quality, standards, and policies are applied across the organization.

References:

DMBOK (Data Management Body of Knowledge), 2nd Edition, Chapter 11: Reference & Master Data Management.

Master Data Management and Data Governance by Alex Berson and Larry Dubov.

Business entities are represented within an organization through various forms, primarily as data or records within information systems.

Technical Capabilities:

While technical capabilities support the management and usage of business entities, they are not the representation of the entities themselves.

Business Capabilities:

Business capabilities describe the functions and processes that an organization can perform, but they do not represent individual business entities.

Files:

Files can contain data or records, but they are not the direct representation of business entities.

Data/Records:

Business entities are captured and managed as data or records within databases and information systems.

These records contain the attributes and details necessary to uniquely identify and describe each business entity.

Domains:

Domains refer to specific areas of knowledge or activity but are not the direct representation of business entities.

An authoritative system where data consumers can obtain reliable data as an alternative to the system of record is known as a "Trusted System."

System of Record:

The system of record (SOR) is the authoritative data source for a particular data element or dataset. It ensures data integrity, accuracy, and consistency.

Trusted System:

A trusted system provides reliable data that consumers can use for transactions and analysis. It acts as a reference point and may serve as an alternative to the system of record.

It ensures that users have access to high-quality, consistent, and trustworthy data, which is essential for decision-making and operational processes.

Other Options:

System of Reference:Generally refers to a system used for lookup and reference purposes but not necessarily authoritative for transactions.

System of Origin:The original source of data before it is integrated into other systems.

Source System:Any system that contributes data to an enterprise system but is not specifically a trusted or authoritative source.

System of Use:The system where data is actively used and consumed for various business processes.

The critical need of any Reference & Master Data effort is executive sponsorship. Executive sponsorship provides the necessary authority, visibility, and support for the MDM initiative. Key aspects include:

Strategic Alignment: Ensures that the MDM effort aligns with the organization's strategic goals and objectives.

Resource Allocation: Secures the required funding, personnel, and other resources needed for the MDM program.

Stakeholder Engagement: Facilitates engagement and commitment from key stakeholders across the organization.

Governance and Oversight: Provides governance and oversight to ensure the MDM program adheres to best practices and delivers value.

Without executive sponsorship, MDM initiatives often struggle to gain traction, secure necessary resources, and achieve long-term success.

References:

DAMA-DMBOK: Data Management Body of Knowledge, 2nd Edition.

"Master Data Management and Data Governance" by Alex Berson and Larry Dubov.

Master data refers to the critical data that is essential to the operations of a business. It typically includes entities such as customers, products, employees, suppliers, and other key business entities. The kinds of information treated as master data can vary widely between industries and even between companies within the same industry.

Industry-Specific Master Data:

Different industries have distinct core data entities critical to their operations. For example, in the healthcare industry, patient and provider data are crucial, whereas, in the retail industry, product and customer data are paramount.

Companies in regulated industries may have specific master data requirements mandated by regulatory bodies.

Company-Specific Master Data:

Within the same industry, different companies may prioritize different sets of master data based on their unique business processes, strategies, and operational needs.

Organizational size, structure, and business model can influence what is considered master data.

Customization and Flexibility:

Master data management (MDM) systems and practices are designed to be flexible to accommodate the unique needs of different organizations.

Customizing MDM allows companies to manage and maintain the integrity of the specific data entities that are critical to their success.

Master Data relationships define how different master data entities are related to each other within an organization. These relationships are crucial for understanding and managing the dataeffectively. The types of master data relationships generally include hierarchies, groupings, and associations that help in organizing and categorizing the data.

Customer Household:

This refers to grouping individual customers into a single household entity. It is commonly used in consumer industries to understand the relationships and dynamics within a household.

Fixed-Level Hierarchy:

A hierarchy with a predetermined number of levels. Each level has a specific position and relationship to other levels, such as organizational hierarchies or product categorization.

Ragged-Level Hierarchy:

Similar to fixed-level hierarchies, but with varying levels of depth. It accommodates entities that may not fit neatly into a fixed-level structure, providing flexibility in the hierarchy.

Grouping based on common criteria:

This involves creating groups or segments of data based on shared attributes or criteria. For example, grouping products by category or customers by region.

Survivorship (NOT a relationship):

Survivorship pertains to the process of determining the most accurate and relevant data when multiple records exist for the same entity. It is a data quality and management process, not a type of relationship.

Master data and metadata are both used to aggregate data, but master data requires that the organization identifies or develops a trusted version of truth for each of its entities.

Trusted Version of Truth:

For effective master data management, an organization must establish a single, trusted version of truth for each master data entity (e.g., customer, product).

This involves harmonizing data from various sources, resolving duplicates, and ensuring consistency and accuracy.

Master Data:

Master data includes critical business information that provides context for business transactions and analysis. It must be consistent, accurate, and up-to-date to support operational and analytical processes.

Other Options:

Transaction Activity Data:Important for operational processes but not the focus for creating master data.

One Set of Data as Source and Target:Not sufficient for managing master data.

Specific Application Solutions:While useful, they do not ensure the creation of a trusted version of truth for master data.

Transaction Audit Data:Important for auditing but not central to master data creation.

Taxonomic reference data involves categorizing and organizing data to enable structured access and retrieval. It facilitates content classification, allowing for efficient multi-level navigation, which is essential for Business Intelligence (BI) activities. By organizing data into a taxonomy, users can easily locate and analyze information, supporting better decision-making processes in BI.

References:

DMBOK (Data Management Body of Knowledge), 2nd Edition, Chapter 11: Reference & Master Data Management.

DAMA-DMBOK Functional Framework, Function: Reference & Master Data Management.

Master data metadata provides crucial information about the master data, offering context and supporting its management and use within the organization.

Who, What, and Where Context:

Metadata provides descriptive information about the master data, including details about who created or modified the data, what the data represents, and where it is used.

This contextual information is essential for understanding the origins, purpose, and usage of the master data.

Includes a Sample of Content:

While metadata might include examples or samples of the data, this is not its primary purpose.

Improving Fit-for-Purpose Choices:

Metadata helps improve the application and governance of master data by providing context and supporting data management decisions.

Securing the Content:

Metadata itself is not primarily focused on security, though it can support data governance and access control processes.

Technical or Business Perspectives:

Metadata can encompass both technical and business perspectives, providing a holistic view of the data's context and usage.