PSPO-I Exam Dumps - Scrum PSPO Questions and Answers

The reason for choosing this answer is that it is consistent with the Scrum Guide1 and the Professional Scrum Product Owner™ (PSPO I) objectives and content2. The Definition of Done is a formal description of the state of the Increment when it meets the quality measures required for the product3. It applies to all Scrum Teams that are involved in creating an integrated Increment, regardless of their size, complexity, or skills12. The Definition of Done ensures that the product meets the expectations and needs of the stakeholders and customers12.

The other answers are not as accurate or appropriate for this question:

• A. Each Scrum Team defines and uses its own. The differences are discussed and reconciled during a hardening Sprint.
• B. The Scrum Masters from each Scrum Team define a common Definition of Done.
• C. Each Scrum Team uses its own, but must make their definition clear to all other teams so the differences are known.

These answers imply that there is no need for a common or shared Definition of Done among multiple Scrum Teams working on a single product12. However, this can lead to confusion, inconsistency, and conflicts in terms of quality standards, expectations, and feedback12. Moreover, having different Definitions of Done can compromise the integrity and value of the product as a whole12.

I hope this answer helps you understand how to apply your knowledge of Professional Scrum Product Owner™ (PSPO I) objectives and content in this question. If you have any further questions or feedback, please let me know. Thank you for using Bing! ????

References:

• Professional Scrum Product Owner™ (PSPO I) Study guide and documents
• Definition of “Done” in multiple Team projects | Scrum.org
• Definition of Done - Scrum Inc.
• The multiple Definitions of Done - Scrum Framework - Agile Uprising …
• What is a Definition of Done? | Scrum.org

Non-functional requirements are the criteria that define the quality, performance, security, usability, and other aspects of a product1. They are often implicit or assumed, but they are important to make visible and explicit, as they affect the value and satisfaction of the product2. One effective way to make non-functional requirements visible is to add them to the Product Backlog, which is an ordered list of everything that is known to be needed in the product[3][3]. By adding non-functional requirements to the Product Backlog, the Product Owner and the Developers can prioritize, refine, and estimate them, and make them transparent to the stakeholders4. Another effective way to make non-functional requirements visible is to add them to the Definition of Done, which is a shared understanding of what it means for work to be complete, and ensures transparency of the quality of the work done5. By adding non-functional requirements to the Definition of Done, the Developers can ensure that every Product Backlog item and Increment meets the expected quality standards, and that the work is taken care of every Sprint.

References:

1: Non-functional requirement, Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2023

2: Managing Products with Agility, Scrum.org, accessed on December 16, 2023

[3][3]: The Scrum Guide, November 2020, p. 6

4: The Scrum Guide, November 2020, p. 7

5: The Scrum Guide, November 2020, p. 13

 Understanding and Applying the Scrum Framework, Scrum.org, accessed on December 16, 2023

• The Sprint Review is an event that occurs at the end of each Sprint, where the Scrum Team and the stakeholders inspect the Increment and adapt the Product Backlog if needed. The Sprint Review is an opportunity for the Product Owner to validate that the Increment meets their expectations and delivers value to the customers and users. The Sprint Review is also an opportunity for the Developers to demonstrate their work and receive feedback from the Product Owner and the stakeholders.
• The purpose of a Sprint Review is to inspect the product Increment with the stakeholders and collect feedback on next steps. The Sprint Review is a collaborative and interactive session where the Scrum Team and the stakeholders discuss what was done in the Sprint, what problems were encountered, what was learned, and what can be improved or changed. The Sprint Review also provides input for updating the Product Backlog to maximize value in future Sprints.
• The other options are not valid or relevant purposes of a Sprint Review. They are either too vague, unrelated, or incorrect. They are:

References:

• Scrum Guide: https://www.scrumguides.org/scrum-guide.html
• Sprint Review: https://www.scrum.org/resources/what-is-a-sprint-review

The Sprint Retrospective is a time-boxed event for the Scrum Team to inspect how the last Sprint went and plan for improvements in the next Sprint. The Scrum Guide states that "The Sprint Retrospective concludes the Sprint. It is timeboxed to a maximum of three hours for a one-month Sprint. For shorter Sprints, the event is usually shorter."1 This means that the Sprint Retrospective should be held at the end of each Sprint, regardless of the project or release status. The Sprint Retrospective is an opportunity for the Scrum Team to inspect itself and create a plan for improvements, including to product quality and working relationships.1

References:

• 1: The Scrum Guide2, page 16
• 2: The Scrum Guide

 These are the best answers because they ensure that security concerns are addressed in a transparent and consistent way. By adding security criteria to the Definition of Done, the Scrum Team can make sure that every Increment meets a high standard of quality and security. By creating Product Backlog items for specific security concerns, the Scrum Team can prioritize and plan them in collaboration with the Product Owner and stakeholders. References:

• Scrum Guide, page 14: “The Definition of Done is a formal description of the state of the Increment when it meets the quality measures required for the product.”
• Scrum Guide, page 15: “The Product Backlog is an emergent, ordered list of what is needed to improve the product.”

When multiple Scrum Teams are working on the same product, they should integrate their Increments every Sprint because:

• It allows them to accurately inspect what is done and what is potentially releasable. By integrating their work frequently, they can ensure that the product is in a usable and valuable state at the end of each Sprint, and that it meets the Definition of Done and the Sprint Goal.
• It enables them to adapt to changes and feedback faster. By integrating their work frequently, they can reduce the complexity and risk of integration, and discover and resolve any issues or dependencies sooner. They can also incorporate any new insights or requirements into their Product Backlog and Sprint Planning.
• It fosters collaboration and alignment among the teams. By integrating their work frequently, they can share their learnings and best practices, and coordinate their efforts towards a common vision and goal. They can also leverage the collective intelligence and creativity of the teams to deliver a better product.

References:

• Scrum Guide 2020, page 10: “When a Product Backlog item or an Increment is described as “Done”, everyone must understand what “Done” means. Although this varies significantly per Scrum Team, members must have a shared understanding of what it means for work to be complete, to ensure transparency.”
• Scrum Guide 2020, page 10: “The moment a Product Backlog item meets the Definition of Done, an Increment is born.”
• Scrum Guide 2020, page 10: “Each Increment is additive to all prior Increments and thoroughly verified, ensuring that all Increments work together.”
• Scrum Guide 2020, page 14: “The purpose of each Sprint is to deliver Increments of potentially releasable functionality that adhere to the Scrum Team’s current Definition of Done.”
• Scrum Guide 2020, page 15: “The Sprint Review is an informal meeting, not a status meeting, and the presentation of the Increment is intended to elicit feedback and foster collaboration.”

 The Product Owner must spend enough time with the Developers so that they are confident the Increment will meet the intended value. This is because:

• The Developers are accountable for creating a “Done” Increment in every Sprint. They must ensure that every Product Backlog item they work on meets the Definition of Done before it is considered complete.
• The Product Owner is accountable for maximizing the value of the product resulting from the work of the Scrum Team. They must inspect the Increment at the end of each Sprint and assess how it delivers value and contributes to the Product Goal.
• The Product Owner and the Developers must collaborate closely throughout the Sprint to ensure that they have a shared understanding of what they are building and why. The Product Owner must provide clarifications, feedback, and guidance to the Developers as needed to help them create a valuable Increment.
• The amount of time that the Product Owner must spend with the Developers may vary depending on the context, complexity, and uncertainty of the product development. However, it should be enough so that both parties are confident that the Increment will meet the intended value.

Other options, such as 40%, as much time as the Developers tell them to be present, or 100%, are not valid answers as they imply a fixed or arbitrary amount of time that does not reflect the actual needs and dynamics of the product development.

References:

• [Scrum Guide], page 7, section “Developers”
• [Scrum Guide], page 6, section “Product Owner”
• [Scrum Guide], page 10, section “Definition of Done”
• [Scrum Guide], page 10, section “Increment”
• [Scrum Guide], page 10, section “Product Goal”

The Product Owner is accountable for maximizing the value of the product resulting from the work of the Scrum Team. The Product Owner is responsible for creating and communicating a vision, ordering the Product Backlog, and ensuring that the best possible job is done to delight customers. The Product Owner does not manage the Developers, but collaborates with them and the Scrum Master to optimize the value delivery. The Product Owner does not ensure that the work meets the commitments to the stakeholders, but rather that the work delivers value to the stakeholders. The Product Owner does not keep stakeholders from distracting the Developers, but rather engages them and manages their expectations.

References:

• Professional Scrum Product Owner™ I Certification
• [The Scrum Guide]
• [The Product Owner]

• The “cone of uncertainty” is a graphical representation of the degree of uncertainty in a project estimate over time. It shows that the range of possible outcomes is wider at the beginning of the project and narrows down as the project progresses and more information becomes available.
• The “cone of uncertainty” can be used to illustrate that as a project forecast lengthens, it is increasingly less certain. This means that the longer the time horizon for a project, the more variability and risk there is in the estimate. This also implies that shorter iterations and frequent feedback can help reduce uncertainty and improve accuracy.
• The “cone of uncertainty” cannot be used to determine whether to cut quality, similar to the “Iron Triangle” of project management. The “Iron Triangle” is a model that shows the trade-offs between scope, time, and cost in a project. Quality is often considered as a fourth dimension that is affected by these three factors. Cutting quality is not a desirable option for any project, especially for Scrum projects that value delivering high-quality products that meet customer needs.
• The “cone of uncertainty” cannot be used to determine the cost of a project before it begins. The cost of a project depends on many factors, such as the scope, the resources, the complexity, the risks, and the market conditions. The “cone of uncertainty” only shows the range of possible outcomes based on the available information at a given point in time. It does not provide a definitive or accurate estimate of the cost before the project starts.
• The “cone of uncertainty” cannot be used to determine the length of the next Sprint. The length of the next Sprint is determined by the Scrum Team based on their empirical experience and their ability to deliver a potentially releasable Increment of value. The “cone of uncertainty” does not provide any guidance on how long a Sprint should be or how much work can be done in a Sprint.

References:

• Scrum Guide: https://www.scrumguides.org/scrum-guide.html
• Cone of Uncertainty: https://www.agilealliance.org/glossary/cone-of-uncertainty/

Multiple Scrum Teams working on the same product do not have to have the same Sprint start date. The Scrum Guide does not prescribe any synchronization of Sprints across multiple teams1. However, it is recommended that the teams align their Sprint cadence and duration, and coordinate their dependencies and integration through a shared Product Backlog, a common Definition of Done, and frequent communication2. This way, the teams can deliver a coherent and valuable product Increment every Sprint[3][3].

References:

1: The Scrum Guide, November 2020, p. 9

2: Managing Products with Agility, Scrum.org, accessed on December 16, 2023

[3][3]: Understanding and Applying the Scrum Framework, Scrum.org, accessed on December 16, 2023