L4M6 Exam Dumps - CIPS Level 4 Diploma in Procurement and Supply Questions and Answers

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

For high-value and high-risk contracts, such as facilities management services for multiple schools,competitive tenderingis the most appropriate sourcing approach. This process involves inviting multiple suppliers to submit bids, ensuring transparency, fairness, and the opportunity to assess various proposals to select the most suitable supplier. It helps in mitigating risks and achieving value for money.

Explanation

The correct answers are information sharing and trust. Further qualitative KPIs are listed on p.102. Deliveries in full and on time would be a quantitative KPI and early supplier involvement is not a KPI at all.

Explanation

Fred should hold a competition as this is a ‘key way of achieving value for money’ p.67. Fred shouldn’t put a business case together to make the product in-house without doing a make vs buy analysis, and that analysis showing make is the way to go. As the firm buy in 100s of components, it’s very unlikely that making the component in-house would bring ‘value for money’. He should also be careful of only looking at current suppliers or known suppliers- the best supplier of this new component might be unknown to the engineering firm at present.

Explanation

The correct answer is ‘Yes- joint innovation projects are often a strong motivation for entering into a partnership’. The other options are simply not true statements. A lot of the questions on the ‘Partnerships’ chapters of the book are common-sense questions like this. It involves reading the QUESTION NO: and using logic, rather that relying on your knowledge of procurement. If you found this QUESTION NO: easy – that’s a good sign for the exam.

Defining standards ensures clear expectations and provides a foundation for accountability and alignment, which are critical for the success of any partnership.

Explanation

Using an external supplier always comes with increased risk, as you become dependant upon them, and have less control over their performance (compared to an in-house team). In this example Harry will have the increased risk that the contract cleaners turn up late to their shifts, or don't do a good job. However, there is no reason to believe that the supplier will not perform as well as an internal team- we don't have enough information from the QUESTION NO: for this to be true. What is true is the RISK isgreater. The other answers are incorrect; the QUESTION NO: doesn't indicate whether outsourcing the cleaning will be more or less expensive for Harry. Allowing staff to focus on other areas is an advantage not a disadvantage. See p.4 for more information on 'External Suppliers'

Explanation

The correct answer is ‘Yes- IPR is a valid concern for both parties but will survive the termination of the agreement’ (p.112). See the section on ‘Legal considerations’ in chapter 2.4

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

During the onboarding stage:

Pre-qualifying and Assessing Capability:Ensures the supplier can meet the organization's requirements.

Building Trusting Relationships:Establishing open communication and trust sets the foundation for a successful partnership.

Keeping information confidential (Option 1) and focusing solely on the buyer's goals (Option 3) can hinder collaboration.

Explanation

Legislative changes wouldn't affect rivalry in a market as all suppliers would be equally as affected, the same with supply chain disruptions. Factors which do affect rivalry include; industry growth and decline, product differences, brand identity, switching costs, diversity of competitors and exit barriers. These are listed on p.41

Partnership sourcing is suitable for products that contribute to the buying organization's unique selling point (USP) and for critical products on which key customers depend. This approach ensures strategic alignment and mutual benefits for both parties, focusing on collaboration rather than cost alone.