Customers use Redhat Linux enterprise 6 LVM to manage user data disks in the cluster. When using pvmove data migration you can not enforce OK. What is a possible reason for this.
A user configures Huawei OceanStor 9000 as follows:
1. Create a user group group01, group01 in the directory / home / group01 configuration like:
Recommended threshold: 10GB, software threshold: 15GB, grace period 10 days hard threshold 20GB
2. Create user user01 in the user group group01. The configuration of the user user01 in the directory / home / group01 is as follows:
The recommended threshold is 8GB
Software threshold 18GB
Grace period of 15 days
Hard threshold 25GB
The quota that user01 is in the directory / home / group01 is:
In an HPUX system, you use the lv image lvreduce or lvsplit command / dev / vg01 / lv - test within a mirror. Which command will test the implementation of the following command lvsplist / dev / vg01 / lv -, using vgdisplay-v system to see what the lv is.
Which of the read and write strategies of Huawei Oceanstor V3 storage system is correct?
Which of the following description is correct about simpana backup software snapshot? (Multiple choice.)
Which of the OceanStor V3 file system remote replication descriptions are correct? (Multiple choice.)
An Oceanstor V3 system "alert" shows a message: "SPF [0] LOW Rx power alarm because Low Rx pow ALM of SFP0 is deleted/deflected. "The cause of the malfunction is:
True of False, N8500 volume mirroring function synchronization can be understood as a file system to do RAID 1 to achieve image protection This protection is done in two ways:
One Species is the mirror roll between showrooms, the display level of protection, a display failure, the business is not affected; the other is the mirror image display within the exhibition.
RAID level protection, a RAID group failure, the business will not be affected.
Existing set customer of database uses a raw device, due to the large amount of data in the database. The customer plans to replace the old storage with new storage devices.
In the process of environmental inspection lvcb engineers found the following:
#getlvcb -TA sjklv
Intrapolicy =
copies = 0
interpolicy =
lvid =
lvname =
label =
machine id =
number Ips = 0
relocatable =
strict =
stripe width = 0
stripe size in exponent = 0
type =
upperbound = 0
fs =
time created = time modified =
As the vg is too large, the expansion of vg is impossible. As the service window is very short, and customers do not want to avoid the risk of large adjustments of the whole original environment, what is the recommended approach?
TESTED 23 Feb 2025
