OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 VCE Exam Download

A MOF (Meta Object Facility) 2.x Model is not always a valid UML (Unified Modeling Language) 2.x Model. The MOF 2.x and UML 2.x serve different purposes and have different scopes of application. While UML is a general-purpose modeling language used to define software systems, MOF is a language for defining metamodels, which can include UML itself1.

The MOF 2.x specification provides the basis for metamodel definition in OMG’s (Object Management Group’s) family of modeling languages, which includes UML. However, it is based on a simplification of UML 2’s class modeling capabilities1. MOF is designed to be simpler, directly implementable, and provides a set of CORBA interfaces for manipulating meta objects2. In contrast, UML is used as a general-purpose modeling language with potentially many implementation targets2.

Therefore, a MOF 2.x Model can be a valid UML 2.x Model when certain limitations are observed, such as adhering to the simplified class modeling capabilities that MOF is based on. This means that while a MOF model can resemble a UML model in terms of visual representation, it is fundamentally a MOF model, and its validity as a UML model depends on the extent to which it conforms to the UML specifications

In UML, the multiplicity of an association end specifies how many instances of the class at that end can participate in a single association. A lower multiplicity of one (1) at one end of an n-ary (where n > 2) association implies that there must be at least one link that combines the values of the other ends, but it doesn't require that a link exists for every possible combination. Therefore, it's possible for some combinations to exist as links, while others do not, which is indicated by the option that links combining the values of the other ends may exist or may not exist. This interpretation is consistent with the definition of multiplicity in associations as outlined in the UML 2.x Superstructure Specification.

The reason for fUML to be compact is to facilitate the definition of clear semantics. A smaller, more focused subset of UML allows for a more precise and unambiguous specification of the execution semantics. This clarity is essential for ensuring that models are executed consistently and as intended across different tools and platforms2. The compact nature of fUML helps inachieving this goal by limiting the scope to the essential elements necessary for execution, thereby reducing complexity and potential for misinterpretation.

The correct answer is C, which uses a transformation edge to indicate that when an order is closed, information is transformed or processed to notify the customer. This is expressed in UML with an object flow that has a transformation property, which specifies how an object is transformed from one state to another as it flows along the edge. Thisis appropriate for a scenario where closing an order leads to the creation of a customer notice, implying some form of transformation or processing of the order information to generate the notice.

References:

• UML 2.5 Specification: The UML 2.5 specification details how object flows with transformations can be used to show that one piece of data is transformed into another as it flows from one action to another.