Free CTPRP Questions Attempt

A documented process to gain approvals for use of open source applications is typically not part of evaluating the vendor’s patch management controls, because it is not directly related to the patching process. Patch management controls are the policies, procedures, and tools that enable an organization to identify, acquire, install, and verify patches for software vulnerabilities. Patch management controls aim to reduce the risk of exploitation of known software flaws and ensure the functionality and compatibility of the patched systems. A documented process to gain approvals for use of open source applications is more relevant to the software development and procurement processes, as it involves assessing the legal, security, and operational implications of using open source software components in the vendor’s products or services. Open source software may have different licensing terms, quality standards, and support levels than proprietary software, and may introduce additional vulnerabilities or dependencies that need to be managed. Therefore, a documented process to gain approvals for use of open source applications is a good practice for vendors, but it is not a patch management control per se. References:

• Guide to Enterprise Patch Management Planning
• Governance of Key Aspects of System Patch Management
• Certified Third Party Risk Professional (CTPRP) Study Guide

The risk of increased expense to conduct vendor assessments based on client contractual requirements is the least important factor in defining your risk assessment process for new global third party relationships. This is because the expense of vendor assessments is not a direct risk to your organization’s security, compliance, reputation, or performance, but rather a cost of doing business that can be budgeted and optimized. While vendor assessments are necessary and beneficial, they are not the primary driver of your risk assessment process, which should focus on the potential impact and likelihood of adverse events or incidents involving your third parties. The other factors (B, C, and D) are more important because they directly affect the level of risk exposure and the mitigation strategies for your third parties. For example, natural disasters and physical security risks can disrupt your third party’s operations and service delivery, government regulation and political stability can affect your third party’s compliance and legal obligations, and financial risk can affect your third party’s solvency and reliability. Therefore, these factors should be considered more carefully when defining your risk assessment process. References:

• 1: Third Party Risk Management: Managing Risk | Deloitte US
• 2: What Is Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM)? 2024 Guide | UpGuard
• 3: What is Third-Party Risk Management? | Blog | OneTrust

Due diligence is the process of evaluating the risks and opportunities associated with a potential or existing third-party vendor. Due diligence can vary in scope and depth depending on the level of risk that the vendor poses to the organization. Lower risk vendors are those that have minimal impact on the organization’s operations, reputation, or compliance, and that do not handle sensitive or confidential data or systems. For lower risk vendors, conducting due diligence may involve accepting the service provider’s self-assessment questionnaire responses as sufficient evidence of their capabilities, performance, and compliance. A self-assessment questionnaire is a tool that allows the vendor to provide information about their organization, services, processes, controls, and policies. The organization can use the questionnaire to verify the vendor’s identity, qualifications, references, and certifications, and to assess the vendor’s alignment with the organization’s standards and expectations. Accepting the vendor’s self-assessment questionnaire responses as the primary source of due diligence can save time and resources for the organization, and can also demonstrate trust and confidence in the vendor. However, the organization should also ensure that the questionnaire is comprehensive, relevant, and updated, and that the vendor’s responses are accurate, complete, and consistent. The organization should also reserve the right to request additional information or documentation from the vendor if needed, and to conduct periodic reviews or audits of the vendor’s performance and compliance.

The other options do not best describe conducting due diligence of a lower risk vendor, because they either involve more extensive or rigorous methods of due diligence, or they are not directly related to due diligence. Preparing reports to management regarding the status of third party risk management and remediation activities is an important part of monitoring and managing the vendor relationship, but it is not a due diligence activity per se. Reviewing a service provider’s self-assessment questionnaire and external audit report(s) is a more thorough way of conducting due diligence, but it may not be necessary or feasible for lower risk vendors, especially if the external audit report(s) are not readily available or relevant. Requesting and filing a service provider’s external audit report(s) for future reference is a good practice for maintaining documentation and evidence of due diligence, but it is not a due diligence activity itself.

References:

• Third Party Risk Management (TPRM) | Shared Assessments
• Vendor Due Diligence Strategy Guide and Checklist | Prevalent
• Vendor due diligence: a practical guide and checklist

Threat modeling is a core element of the Microsoft Security Development Lifecycle (SDL) and a structured approach to identify, quantify, and address the security risks associated with an application12. Threat modeling helps to shape the application’s design, meet the security objectives, and reduce risk1. The best time to perform threat modeling analysis is before the application design and development activities begin, as this allows the application service provider to:

• Communicate about the security design of their systems1.
• Analyze the design for potential security issues using a proven methodology1.
• Suggest and manage mitigations for security issues1.
• Incorporate security requirements into the design2.
• Avoid costly rework or redesign later in the SDLC2.
• Identify the most critical and relevant threats to focus on2. References: 1: Microsoft Security Development Lifecycle Threat Modelling1 2: Threat Modeling Process | OWASP Foundation2