CISMP-V9 Exam Dumps - BCS Information security and CCP scheme certifications Questions and Answers

Changing default system passwords is a fundamental step in securing a new web server. Default passwords are often well-known and can be easily found in public documentation or through internet searches, making systems with unchanged default passwords highly vulnerable to unauthorized access. By changing these passwords, an administrator immediately reduces the risk of simple, automated attacks that exploit default credentials.

While the other options listed are also important security measures, they are not typically the first action taken. Encrypting the hard disk (B) is a good practice for protecting data at rest, but it does not protect against unauthorized access via default passwords. Hardening applications © and patching the OS (D) are critical for reducing the attack surface and protecting against known vulnerabilities, but they are generally performed after ensuring that the system is not accessible with default passwords.

References: The BCS Foundation Certificate in Information Security Management Principles emphasizes the importance of initial access control measures, such aschanging default passwords, as part of establishing a secure baseline before implementing further technical controls1.

Syslog is a standard for message logging and allows devices to send event notification messages across IP networks to event message collectors - also known as Syslog servers or SIEM (Security Information and Event Management) systems. Native support for syslog is commonly found in various network devices and Unix/Linux-based systems.

• Enterprise Wireless Access Points, Linux Web Server Appliances, and Enterprise Stateful Firewalls typically have built-in capabilities to generate and send syslog messages to a SIEM system for monitoring and analysis.
• Windows Desktop Systems, on the other hand, do not natively support syslog because Windows uses its own event logging system known as Windows Event Log. While it is possible to configure Windows systems to send logs to a SIEM appliance, this usually requires additional software or agents to translate Windows Event Log messages into syslog format before they can be sent1.

References: The information provided here is based on common knowledge of system logging protocols and SIEM system capabilities, which are part of the foundational knowledge of Information Security Management Principles as outlined by BCS and supported by industry insights12.

The Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) is the current specification for the encryption of electronic data established by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). AES is a symmetric block cipher that can encrypt (encipher) and decrypt (decipher) information, converting data to an unintelligible form called ciphertext and back to its original form, plaintext. The AES algorithm is capable of using cryptographic keys of 128, 192, and 256 bits to encrypt and decrypt data in blocks of 128 bits. It was selected by NIST as a Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) to protect electronic data and is widely recognized and used for secure data encryption1.

References: The BCS Foundation Certificate in Information Security Management Principles outlines the importance of understanding various encryption algorithms, including AES, for protecting electronic data. The NIST publication on AES provides detailed information about the standard and its application1.

The primary difference between DevOps and DevSecOps lies in the integration of security practices. DevOps is a methodology that emphasizes collaboration between development and operations teams to automate the software development process, including continuous integration (CI) and continuous delivery (CD). However, DevOps does not inherently prioritize security as part of the development process.

DevSecOps, on the other hand, extends the DevOps principles by integrating security into every aspect of the software development lifecycle. This approach is often summarized by the term “shift-left,” which means incorporating security from the beginning and throughout the development process, rather than treating it as an afterthought or a final step before deployment. In DevSecOps, security is considered a shared responsibility among all team members, and it is addressed through continuous security processes that are as integral as CI/CD in the DevOps culture.

References: The distinction between DevOps and DevSecOps is well-documented in various sources that discuss their methodologies and the importance of integrating security into the development lifecycle12345.

The software program described is one that obfuscates the source code, making it difficult to inspect, manipulate, or reverse engineer. This is characteristic of proprietary source software, where the source code is not openly shared or available for public viewing or modification. Proprietary software companies often obfuscate their code to protect intellectual property and prevent unauthorized use or reproduction of their software. Unlike open-source software, where the source code is available for anyone to view, modify, and distribute, proprietary software keeps its source code a secret to maintain control over the software’s functions and distribution.

References: The concept of obfuscating source code is aligned with the Information Security Management Principles under the domain of Technical Security Controls, which includes protecting intellectual property and preventing unauthorized access12345.

The reporting of security incidents involving personal data is distinct from other types of incidents primarily due to the legal obligations imposed by data protection legislation. Such laws typically mandate that organizations report certain types of breaches involving personal data to a Supervisory Authority within a specified timeframe. This requirement is in place to ensure prompt and appropriate response to potential privacy risks affecting individuals’ rights and freedoms. Failure to comply can result in significant penalties for the organization. The reporting process also often includes notifying affected individuals, especially if there is a high risk of adverse effects on their rights and freedoms12.

References :=

• The UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018 outline the duty of organizations to report certain personal data breaches to the relevant supervisory authority, such as the ICO, within 72 hours of becoming aware of the breach1.
• The ICO’s guide on personal data breaches provides detailed instructions on how to recognize a breach, the reporting process, and the importance of having robust breach detection, investigation, and internal reporting procedures12.

The method used to target senior individuals in an organization for coercing them into actions like misdirected high-value payments is known as a whaling attack. This type of attack is a more targeted version of phishing, aimed specifically at high-ranking executives or important individuals within an organization. The attackers masquerade as a senior player at the organization and use social engineering techniques to trick the target into performing actions such as transferring money or revealing sensitive information. Whaling attacks are highly personalized and often involve extensive research on the target to make the fraudulent requestsseem legitimate and convincing. The term “whaling” is used because it refers to going after the “big fish” or “whales” of an organization, such as CEOs or CFOs, who have access to significant resources and sensitive information. References: Based on the information provided by Kaspersky’s resource center on whaling attacks1.

 In the context of business continuity (BC), the individual tasked with documenting all relevant details during a BC exercise or actual plan activation is known as the Scribe. The Scribe’s role is crucial as they ensure that all actions, decisions, and changes are recorded accurately, which is essential for post-incident reviews and audits. This position supports the BC process by providing a clear and chronological account of events, which is vital for assessing the effectiveness of the BC plan and for making improvements.

References: The information aligns with the knowledge domains covered in the BCS Foundation Certificate in Information Security Management Principles, particularly under the domain of Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity Management1.

When preserving a crime scene for digital evidence, it is crucial to maintain the integrity of the evidence while also ensuring that volatile data is not lost. The initial actions should include photographing all evidence, which helps document the scene and the location of digital devices. This is important for later analysis and may be required for legal proceedings. Triage is the process of determining the importance of digital evidence and whether live data capture is necessary. Live data capture can be essential because some data can be lost if a device is powered down, such as encryption keys or active network connections1.

References: The BCS Foundation Certificate in Information Security Management Principles provides a framework for understanding information security management, including the importance of preserving digital evidence. It emphasizes the need for proper documentation, handling, and analysis of digital evidence to support the principles of information security management2. Additionally, guidelines from authoritative sources like the Electronic Crime Scene Investigation Guide by the National Institute of Justice provide detailed steps for handling digital evidence, which supports the answer provided1.

 When outsourcing data processing, the original data owner has a legal duty of care to ensure that the third party is competent to process the data securely (1) and observes the same high standards as the data owner (2). This means that the third party must have the necessary skills, knowledge, and security measures in place to protect the data,and they must adhere to the same level of data protection and privacy standards as the original owner. Processing the data wherever it can be transferred (3) and archiving the data for the third party’s own long-term usage (4) are not primary legal considerations and may, in fact, contravene data protection laws if done without proper safeguards and compliance with regulations.

References: The duty of care in the context of data protection is a critical aspect of GDPR and other privacy regulations, which emphasize the responsibility of data controllers to ensure that any third-party processors they use comply with the same data protection standards1. Additionally, the principles of due care and due diligence in cybersecurity highlight the importance of selecting competent third-party service providers and ensuring they maintain high standards of data protection2.