CGFM Exam Dumps - AGA Government Financial Manager Questions and Answers

What Is an Attestation Engagement?An attestation engagement is a type of professional service where an independent practitioner (typically an auditor or CPA) evaluates and provides a report on assertions made by another party about a specific subject matter. These engagements follow standards set by organizations like the AICPA or GAO.

Who Makes the Assertion?

Management's Role:Management is the party responsible for making an assertion about the subject matter under review. For example, management might assert that internal controls are effective or that financial statements are fairly presented.

Auditor/Practitioner’s Role:The auditor or practitioner examines the evidence related to the assertion and provides an opinion or conclusion based on that examination.

User’s Role:The users are the stakeholders (e.g., investors, regulators) who rely on the practitioner’s report, but they do not make assertions.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

B. Auditor/Practitioner:The auditor or practitioner evaluates the assertion made by management, not the other way around.

C. Practitioner:See above—practitioners don’t make assertions.

D. User:Users are the intended audience of the attestation report, not the party making assertions.

References and Documents:

AICPA Attestation Standards (SSAEs):Clarifies the role of management in making assertions during attestation engagements.

GAO’s Government Auditing Standards (Yellow Book):Provides additional guidance on the roles of parties in attestation engagements.

Antideficiency Act Overview:

TheAntideficiency Act (31 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1342, 1517)prohibits federal agencies from:

Obligating or expending funds in excess of their appropriations.

Entering into contracts without sufficient appropriated funds.

Violating the Act is a serious matter, and agencies are required to report such violations to Congress and the President.

Explanation of Answer Choices:

A. Federal Managers’ Financial Integrity Act: Incorrect. This Act requires agencies to assess internal controls, not monitor appropriations.

B. Federal Financial Management Improvement Act: Incorrect. This Act focuses on improving financial systems, not budgetary compliance.

C. Antideficiency Act: Correct. This Act directly prohibits expenditures beyond appropriations.

D. Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Incorrect. This Act applies to corporate financial reporting, not federal appropriations.

References:

Antideficiency Act (31 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1342, 1517).

GAO,Principles of Federal Appropriations Law.

Definition of Cost-Effectiveness Measures:

Cost-effectiveness measures assess therelationship between inputs (resources used)andoutcomes (results achieved)to determine whether a program delivers value for the resources invested.

Explanation of Answer Choices:

A. Efficiency measures: Incorrect. These relate inputs to outputs, focusing on how efficiently resources are used to produce services, but not directly tied to outcomes.

B. Process measures: Incorrect. These measure activities or steps within a program but do not assess outcomes.

C. Cost-effectiveness measures: Correct. These directly link inputs to outcomes, measuring the program’s effectiveness in achieving its objectives relative to costs.

D. Activity measures: Incorrect. These track the level of activity or effort but not outcomes or effectiveness.

References:

GASB,Performance Measurement and Reporting for Government Programs.

GAO,Best Practices in Measuring Program Effectiveness.

Why Select the Lowest Qualified Bidder?

Procurement rules in government require selecting thelowest qualified bidderto ensure fairness, cost-efficiency, and compliance with procurement regulations.

If the mayor’s high school classmate’s company meets the qualification criteria and provides the lowest bid, there is no conflict of interest unless favoritism or improper influence is proven.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

B. Second lowest priced qualified bidder:Selecting the second lowest bidder without justification violates the principle of fairness and cost-efficiency.

C. Third lowest bidder pending state disbarment:This vendor is not a qualified bidder due to pending disbarment.

D. Highest priced qualified bidder with the highest quality products:If quality specifications are already met by lower bidders, selecting the highest-priced bidder is unjustifiable.

References and Documents:

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR):Requires selecting the lowest qualified bidder.

GAO Guide on Procurement Standards:Emphasizes fairness and cost-effectiveness in vendor selection.