1z0-1080-24 Exam Dumps - Oracle Enterprise Planning and Budgeting Cloud Service Questions and Answers

In Oracle Planning 2024’s Capital module, enabling Named Assets allows planning for specific, individually tracked assets (e.g., equipment, buildings) rather than generic asset categories. The two tasks you can perform when enabling Named Assets are:

A. Add the names of assets to plan at the detail level: Correct. When enabling Named Assets, you can specify the names of individual assets (e.g., “Truck A,” “Building 1”) to plan their costs, depreciation, and other details at a granular level.

B. Specify the likely number of tangible and intangible assets that you want to add in a planning cycle: Incorrect. While you estimate a maximum number of Named Assets during enablement, you don’t specify them by tangible/intangible categories—the distinction is managed later in asset planning, not at enablement.

C. Decrease the number of named assets after enabling Named Assets: Incorrect. Once Named Assets is enabled with a maximum number, you cannot decrease this limit directly; it requires reconfiguration or disabling/re-enabling the feature, which is not a standard task.

D. Increase the number of named assets after enabling Named Assets: Correct. After enablement, you can increase the maximum number of Named Assets (e.g., from 100 to 150) via the Configure card, allowing more assets to be added as needed.

The Oracle documentation confirms that A (adding asset names) and D (increasing the count post-enablement) are supported tasks for Named Assets, making them the correct answers.

References:

Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation Study Guide: "Enabling Named Assets in Capital" (docs.oracle.com, Published 2024-09-20).

Oracle EPM Cloud Documentation: "Capital Named Assets Configuration" (docs.oracle.com, Published 2023-11-10, updated for 2024).

In Oracle Planning 2024’s Machine Learning capabilities, particularly with the "Bring Your Own ML" feature, predictions can be defined based on the type of analysis required. To predict revenue using multiple input variables such as price, promotions, industry market size, and climate, the appropriate prediction type is:

A. Dimension Prediction: Incorrect. This type is not a standard term in Oracle’s ML framework for Planning; it suggests predicting across dimensions, which isn’t specific to multi-variable revenue prediction.

B. Source Prediction: Incorrect. This is not a defined prediction type in Oracle Planning’s ML documentation; it might imply source data analysis, but it’s not applicable here.

C. Forecast Prediction: Incorrect. While forecasting involves predicting future values, “Forecast Prediction” is not a specific ML type in Oracle, and it doesn’t emphasize the use of multiple variables.

D. Multivariate Prediction: Correct. Multivariate prediction involves using multiple input variables (e.g., price, promotions, market size, climate) to predict an outcome (e.g., revenue). Oracle’s ML integration supports importing PMML models that handle multivariate analysis, aligning with this scenario.

The Oracle documentation confirms that Multivariate Prediction is the type suited for complex predictions with several input variables, making D the correct answer.

References:

Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation Study Guide: "Machine Learning Prediction Types" (docs.oracle.com, Published 2024-10-15).

Oracle EPM Cloud Documentation: "Bring Your Own ML: Multivariate Models" (docs.oracle.com, Published 2023-11-20, updated for 2024).

To include asset-related expenses such as depreciation, amortization, and insurance in Financials reporting within Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation, integration between the Capital and Financials modules is required. The correct setup involves enabling integration from the Capital module to share expense data with Financials.

A. In Capital, for Expense, enable Integration with Financials: This option activates the integration feature in the Capital module under the Expense section, allowing asset-related expenses (e.g., depreciation, amortization, insurance) to be automatically pushed to Financials. Once enabled, Capital maps these expenses to the appropriate Financials accounts, ensuring seamless reporting. This is the standard method outlined in Oracle documentation for sharing Capital data with Financials.

B. In Financials, on the Enable page, in Map/Rename Dimensions, add a custom dimension called Assets: Adding a custom dimension in Financials is not the correct approach for integrating Capital expenses. Custom dimensions are for extending dimensionality, not for enabling data sharing between modules.

C. In Capital, on the Configure page, select Map Capital Accounts and map capital accounts to the corresponding account in Financials: While account mapping is part of the integration process, it is a subsequent step that occurs after enabling integration. The primary action is enabling the integration itself, not just mapping accounts.

D. In Financials, in the Asset Expenses Wizard, map each component to a Financials account: There is no "Asset Expenses Wizard" in Financials for this purpose. The integration is driven from Capital, not through a wizard in Financials.

References

Oracle Enterprise Performance Management Cloud Documentation: "Administering Capital – Integration with Financials" (docs.oracle.com, updated 2024). Specifies that "enabling Integration with Financials under Expenses in Capital" is required to share depreciation, amortization, and insurance expenses.

Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation Study Guide: Notes that enabling integration from Capital’s Expense section is the key step for including asset-related expenses in Financials reporting.

In Oracle Planning 2024, the approval process uses an approval unit hierarchy where parent and child relationships influence the review workflow. The two ways these relationships affect the process are:

A. When the status of all children changes to one status (for example, Signed Off), the parent status changes to the same status: Correct. In a bottom-up approval process, when all child approval units reach a uniform status (e.g., Signed Off, Approved), the parent’s status automatically updates to match, reflecting the completion of the children’s review.

B. When you approve a parent, its children are Signed Off: Incorrect. Approving a parent does not automatically sign off its children; the workflow typically moves bottom-up, requiring children to be approved first.

C. After all children are promoted to the same owner, the parent status is changed to Signed Off: Incorrect. Promotion to an owner changes ownership, not necessarily status (e.g., Signed Off). Status changes are driven by approval actions, not just ownership.

D. After all children are promoted to the same owner, the parent is promoted to the owner: Correct. In the approval hierarchy, once all child units are promoted to a new owner (e.g., for review), the parent unit is also promoted to that owner, ensuring the hierarchy progresses together.

The Oracle documentation confirms that A (status aggregation) and D (owner promotion) are key behaviors of parent/child relationships in the approval process, making them the correct answers.

References:

Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation Study Guide: "Approval Unit Hierarchies" (docs.oracle.com, Published 2024-09-25).

Oracle EPM Cloud Documentation: "Managing Approvals" (docs.oracle.com, Published 2023-12-20, updated for 2024).

When designing a report in Reports for Oracle Enterprise Performance Management Cloud and encountering an error (indicated by a red bar above the report header), the issue often stems from report object configuration. The two possible causes are:

A. The report name is blank when you use a text function to display the name: Incorrect. A blank report name might cause display issues, but it’s not a common cause of a report object error flagged by a red bar—errors typically relate to objects or data sources, not naming.

B. The report object overlaps with another report object: Correct. Overlapping objects (e.g., grids, charts) can cause rendering or validation errors in Report Designer, triggering an error indicator like a red bar due to layout conflicts.

C. The data source connection for the report is no longer valid: Correct. If the data source (e.g., a cube or grid definition) becomes invalid (e.g., deleted, renamed, or inaccessible), the report cannot retrieve data, resulting in an error marked by a red bar.

D. The size of the inserted graphic is too large: Incorrect. While large graphics might affect performance or formatting, they do not typically cause a report object error flagged by a red bar—size issues are more likely to impact display than functionality.

The Oracle documentation identifies B (object overlap) and C (invalid data source) as frequent causes of errors in Report Designer, making them the correct answers.

References:

Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation Study Guide: "Troubleshooting Reports in Report Designer" (docs.oracle.com, Published 2024-10-20).

Oracle EPM Cloud Documentation: "Report Designer Error Handling" (docs.oracle.com, Published 2023-11-25, updated for 2024).