Source Path Destination Path Relationship ID Relationship Type
msgld: msragld: 78e304e0-9781-1234-abcd-00a098d771bd XDP
msxpgld: msraxpgld: 3ca42ab4-9782-1234-abcd-00a098d771bd XDP
na_docavgld: ndradocavgld: a4b233b2-9783-1234-abcd-00a098d771bd XDP
na_dr: ndradr: c97d36a0-6d7c-11e8-83fb-00a098d771bd XDP
na_gld: ndragld: 9e7e034d-9782-1234-abcd-00a098d771bd XDP
na_mpgld: ndrampgld: 16e52e0d-9783-1234-abcd-00a098d771bd XDP
na_opengld: ndraopengld: dabb1813-9780-1234-abcd-00a098d771bd XDP
na_poc: ndrapoc: c1d632d7-977b-1234-abcd-00a098d771bd XDP
na_pubgld: ndrapubgld: 1a3f866c-9780-1234-abcd-00a098d771bd XDP
Referring to the output, which type of SnapMirror destination relationship is being used?
For testing purposes, your customer decides to use FC on a single-node ONTAP cluster. There is only one host that the customer expects to use. High availability is not a concern for this test. The customer connects the host directly to the ONTAP node. The LUN is set up, and the igroup is configured. When the customer tries to attach to the LUN from the host, the LUN is not seen by the host.
Which statement is correct in this scenario?
A customer will need to perform an upgrade from 9.0 to 9.4.
Which feature of ONTAP enables nondisruptive hardware maintenance for this upgrade?
Your Windows clients were able to access your CIFS SVM yesterday. Today they are no longer able to access the CIFS SVM on your NetApp cluster. Your IT security team just pushed out a new group policy to enhance security.
In this scenario, which statement is true?
Your customer's MetroCluster has generated a "DISK REDUNDANCY FAILED" message.
Netapp-EmA:
Tue Jan 14 04:12:12 CET [netapp-EmA:cf.rv.notConnected:error]: HA interconnect: Connection for 'cfo_rv' failed.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:13 CET [netapp-EmA:rv.connection.torndown:info]: HA interconnect: cfo_rv1 is torn down on NIC 1.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:13 CET [netapp-EmA:cf.rv.notConnected:error]: HA interconnect: Connection for 'cfo_rv'1 failed.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:15 CET [netapp-EmA:rv.connection.torndown:info]: HA interconnect: cfo_rv2 is torn down on NIC 1.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:18 CET [netapp-EmA:cf.rv.notConnected:error]: HA interconnect: Connection for 'cfo_rv'2 failed.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:19 CET [netapp-EmA:bridge.removed:info]: FC-to_SAS bridge siteB_2:13.126L0 [ATTO FibreBridge6500N 1.61] S/N [FB7500N111161] was removed
Tue Jan 14 04:12:19 CET [netapp-EmA:bridge.removed:info]: FC-to_SAS bridge siteB_2:5.126L0 [ATTO FibreBridge6500N 1.61] S/N [FB7500N111160] was removed
Netapp-EmB:
Tue Jan 14 04:12:12 CET [netapp-EmB:cf.rv.notConnected:error]: HA interconnect: Connection for 'cfo_rv' failed.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:12 CET [netapp-EmB:rv.connection.torndown:info]: HA interconnect: cfo_rv2 is torn down on NIC 1.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:13 CET [netapp-EmB:rv.connection.torndown:info]: HA interconnect: cfo_rv1 is torn down on NIC 1.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:13 CET [netapp-EmB:cf.rv.notConnected:error]: HA interconnect: Connection for 'cfo_rv'1 failed.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:18 CET [netapp-EmB:cf.rv.notConnected:error]: HA interconnect: Connection for 'cfo_rv'2 failed.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:19 CET [netapp-EmB:bridge.removed:info]: FC-to_SAS bridge siteA_2:13.126L0 [ATTO FibreBridge6500N 1.61] S/N [FB7500N111167] was removed
Tue Jan 14 04:12:19 CET [netapp-EmB:bridge.removed:info]: FC-to_SAS bridge siteA_2:5.126L0 [ATTO FibreBridge6500N 1.61] S/N [FB7500N111164] was removed
Referring to the messages shown in the exhibit for each node, which component is causing the problem?
When you replace a motherboard, which step will completely test the newly installed component?