Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer Google Exam Lab Questions

The best option for parametrizing the model training in Kubeflow Pipelines is to add a ContainerOp to the pipeline that spins a Dataproc cluster, runs a transformation, and then saves the transformed data in Cloud Storage. This option has the following advantages:

It allows the data transformation to be performed as part of the Kubeflow Pipeline, which can ensure the consistency and reproducibility of the data processing and the model training. By adding a ContainerOp to the pipeline, you can define the parameters and the logic of the data transformation step, and integrate it with the other steps of the pipeline, such as the model training and evaluation.

It leverages the scalability and performance of Dataproc, which is a fully managed service that runs Apache Spark and Apache Hadoop clusters on Google Cloud. By spinning a Dataproc cluster, you can run the PySpark transformation on the Parquet files stored in the Hive table, and take advantage of the parallelism and speed of Spark. Dataproc also supports various features and integrations, such as autoscaling, preemptible VMs, and connectors to other Google Cloud services, that can optimize the data processing and reduce the cost.

It simplifies the data storage and access, as the transformed data is saved in Cloud Storage, which is a scalable, durable, and secure object storage service. By saving the transformed data in Cloud Storage, you can avoid the overhead and complexity of managing the data in the Hive table or the Parquet files. Moreover, you can easily access the transformed data from Cloud Storage, using various tools and frameworks, such as TensorFlow, BigQuery, or Vertex AI.

The other options are less optimal for the following reasons:

Option A: Removing the data transformation step from the pipeline eliminates the parametrization of the model training, as the data processing and the model training are decoupled and independent. This option requires running the PySpark transformation separately from the Kubeflow Pipeline, which can introduce inconsistency and unreproducibility in the data processing and the model training. Moreover, this option requires managing the data in the Hive table or the Parquet files, which can be cumbersome and inefficient.

Option B: Containerizing the PySpark transformation step, and adding it to the pipeline introduces additional complexity and overhead. This option requires creating and maintaining a Docker image that can run the PySpark transformation, which can be challenging and time-consuming. Moreover, this option requires running the PySpark transformation on a single container, which can be slow and inefficient, as it does not leverage the parallelism and performance of Spark.

Option D: Deploying Apache Spark at a separate node pool in a Google Kubernetes Engine cluster, and adding a ContainerOp to the pipeline that invokes a corresponding transformation job for this Spark instance introduces additional complexity and cost. This option requires creating and managing a separate node pool in a Google Kubernetes Engine cluster, which is a fully managed service that runs Kubernetes clusters on Google Cloud. Moreover, this option requires deploying and running Apache Spark on the node pool, which can be tedious and costly, as it requires configuring and maintaining the Spark cluster, and paying for the node pool usage.

The best option for developing a solution that predicts the presence and severity of the disease with high accuracy is to develop an image segmentation ML model to locate the boundaries of the rust spots. Image segmentation is a technique that partitions an image into multiple regions, each corresponding to a different object or semantic category. Image segmentation can be used to detect and localize the rust spots in the images of crops, and measure their shape and size. This information can then be used to determine the presence and severity of the disease, as the rust spots are correlated to the disease symptoms. Image segmentation can also handle the variability of the rust spots, as it does not rely on predefined templates or thresholds. Image segmentation can be implemented using deep learning models, such as U-Net, Mask R-CNN, or DeepLab, which can learn from large-scale datasets and achieve high accuracy and robustness. The other options are not as suitable for developing a solution that predicts the presence and severity of the disease with high accuracy, because:

Creating an object detection model that can localize the rust spots would only provide the bounding boxes of the rust spots, not their exact boundaries. This would result in less precise measurements of the shape and size of the rust spots, and might affect the accuracy of the disease prediction. Object detection models are also more complex and computationally expensive than image segmentation models, as they have to perform both classification and localization tasks.

Developing a template matching algorithm using traditional computer vision libraries would require manually designing and selecting the templates for the rust spots, which might not capture the diversity and variability of the rust spots. Template matching algorithms are also sensitive to noise, occlusion, rotation, and scale changes, and might fail to detect the rust spots in different scenarios. Template matching algorithms are also less accurate and robust than deep learning models, as they do not learn from data.

Developing an image classification ML model to predict the presence of the disease would only provide a binary or categorical output, not the location or severity of the disease. Image classification models are also less informative and interpretable than image segmentation models, as they do not provide any spatial information or visual explanation for the prediction. Image classification models might also suffer from class imbalance or mislabeling issues, as the presence of the disease might not be consistent or clear across the images. References:

Image Segmentation | Computer Vision | Google Developers

Crop diseases and pests detection based on deep learning: a review | Plant Methods | Full Text

Using Deep Learning for Image-Based Plant Disease Detection

Computer Vision, IoT and Data Fusion for Crop Disease Detection Using …

On Using Artificial Intelligence and the Internet of Things for Crop …

Crop Disease Detection Using Machine Learning and Computer Vision

The best option for implementing the processing steps so that they run at serving time, minimizing code changes and infrastructure maintenance, and deploying the model into production as quickly as possible, is to use the Predictor interface to implement a custom prediction routine. Build the custom container, upload the container to Vertex AI Model Registry, and deploy it to a Vertex AI endpoint. This option allows you to leverage the power and simplicity of Vertex AI to serve your XGBoost model with minimal effort and customization. Vertex AI is a unified platform for building and deploying machine learning solutions on Google Cloud. Vertex AI can deploy a trained XGBoost model to an online prediction endpoint, which can provide low-latency predictions for individual instances. A custom prediction routine (CPR) is a Python script that defines the logic for preprocessing the input data, running the prediction, and postprocessing the output data. A CPR can help you customize the prediction behavior of your model, and handle complex or non-standard data formats. A CPR can also help you minimize the code changes, as you only need to write a few functions to implement the prediction logic. A Predictor interface is a class that inherits from the base class aiplatform.Predictor, and implements the abstract methods predict() and preprocess(). A Predictor interface can help you create a CPR by defining the preprocessing and prediction logic for your model. A container image is a package that contains the model, the CPR, and the dependencies. A container image can help you standardize and simplify the deployment process, as you only need to upload the container image to Vertex AI Model Registry, and deploy it to Vertex AI Endpoints. By using the Predictor interface to implement a CPR, building the custom container, uploading the container to Vertex AI Model Registry, and deploying it to a Vertex AI endpoint, you can implement the processing steps so that they run at serving time, minimize code changes and infrastructure maintenance, and deploy the model into production as quickly as possible1.

The other options are not as good as option C, for the following reasons:

Option A: Using FastAPI to implement an HTTP server, creating a Docker image that runs your HTTP server, and deploying it on your organization’s GKE cluster would require more skills and steps than using the Predictor interface to implement a CPR, building the custom container, uploading the container to Vertex AI Model Registry, and deploying it to a Vertex AI endpoint. FastAPI is a framework for building web applications and APIs in Python. FastAPI can help you implement an HTTP server that can handle prediction requests and responses, and perform data preprocessing and postprocessing. A Docker image is a package that contains the model, the HTTP server, and the dependencies. A Docker image can help you standardize and simplify the deployment process, as you only need to build and run the Docker image. GKE is a service that can create and manage Kubernetes clusters on Google Cloud. GKE can help you deploy and scale your Docker image on Google Cloud, and provide high availability and performance. However, using FastAPI to implement an HTTP server, creating a Docker image that runs your HTTP server, and deploying it on your organization’s GKE cluster would require more skills and steps than using the Predictor interface to implement a CPR, building the custom container, uploading the container to Vertex AI Model Registry, and deploying it to a Vertex AI endpoint. You would need to write code, create and configure the HTTP server, build and test the Docker image, create and manage the GKE cluster, and deploy and monitor the Docker image. Moreover, this option would not leverage the power and simplicity of Vertex AI, which can provide online prediction natively integrated with Google Cloud services2.

Option B: Using FastAPI to implement an HTTP server, creating a Docker image that runs your HTTP server, uploading the image to Vertex AI Model Registry, and deploying it to a Vertex AI endpoint would require more skills and steps than using the Predictor interface to implement a CPR, building the custom container, uploading the container to Vertex AI Model Registry, and deploying it to a Vertex AI endpoint. FastAPI is a framework for building web applications and APIs in Python. FastAPI can help you implement an HTTP server that can handle prediction requests and responses, and perform data preprocessing and postprocessing. A Docker image is a package that contains the model, the HTTP server, and the dependencies. A Docker image can help you standardize and simplify the deployment process, as you only need to build and run the Docker image. Vertex AI Model Registry is a service that can store and manage your machine learning models on Google Cloud. Vertex AI Model Registry can help you upload and organize your Docker image, and track the model versions and metadata. Vertex AI Endpoints is a service that can provide online prediction for your machine learning models on Google Cloud. Vertex AI Endpoints can help you deploy your Docker image to an online prediction endpoint, which can provide low-latency predictions for individual instances. However, using FastAPI to implement an HTTP server, creating a Docker image that runs your HTTP server, uploading the image to Vertex AI Model Registry, and deploying it to a Vertex AI endpoint would require more skills and steps than using the Predictor interface to implement a CPR, building the custom container, uploading the container to Vertex AI Model Registry, and deploying it to a Vertex AI endpoint. You would need to write code, create and configure the HTTP server, build and test the Docker image, upload the Docker image to Vertex AI Model Registry, and deploy the Docker image to Vertex AI Endpoints. Moreover, this option would not leverage the power and simplicity of Vertex AI, which can provide online prediction natively integrated with Google Cloud services2.

Option D: Using the XGBoost prebuilt serving container when importing the trained model into Vertex AI, deploying the model to a Vertex AI endpoint, working with the backend engineers to implement the pre- and postprocessing steps in the Golang backend service would not allow you to implement the processing steps so that they run at serving time, and could increase the code changes and infrastructure maintenance. A XGBoost prebuilt serving container is a container image that is provided by Google Cloud, and contains the XGBoost framework and the dependencies. A XGBoost prebuilt serving container can help you deploy a XGBoost model without writing any code, but it also limits your customization options. A XGBoost prebuilt serving container can only handle standard data formats, such as JSON or CSV, and cannot perform any preprocessing or postprocessing on the input or output data. If your input data requires any transformation or normalization before running the prediction, you cannot use a XGBoost prebuilt serving container. A Golang backend service is a service that is implemented in Golang, a programming language that can be used for web development and system programming. A Golang backend service can help you handle the prediction requests and responses from the frontend, and communicate with the Vertex AI endpoint. However, using the XGBoost prebuilt serving container when importing the trained model into Vertex AI, deploying the model to a Vertex AI endpoint, working with the backend engineers to implement the pre- and postprocessing steps in the Golang backend service would not allow you to implement the processing steps so that they run at serving time, and could increase the code changes and infrastructure maintenance. You would need to write code, import the trained model into Vertex AI, deploy the model to a Vertex AI endpoint, implement the pre- and postprocessing steps in the Golang backend service, and test and monitor the Golang backend service. Moreover, this option would not leverage the power and simplicity of Vertex AI, which can provide online prediction natively integrated with Google Cloud services2.

References:

Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer, Course 3: Production ML Systems, Week 2: Serving ML Predictions

Google Cloud Professional Machine Learning Engineer Exam Guide, Section 3: Scaling ML models in production, 3.1 Deploying ML models to production

Official Google Cloud Certified Professional Machine Learning Engineer Study Guide, Chapter 6: Production ML Systems, Section 6.2: Serving ML Predictions

Custom prediction routines

Using pre-built containers for prediction

Using custom containers for prediction

Option A is incorrect because training local surrogate models to explain individual predictions is not a feature of Vertex Explainable AI, but rather a general technique for interpreting black-box models. Local surrogate models are simpler models that approximate the behavior of the original model around a specific input1.

Option B is correct because configuring sampled Shapley explanations on Vertex Explainable AI is a way to explain the difference between the actual prediction and the average prediction for a given input. Sampled Shapley explanations are based on the Shapley value, which is a game-theoretic concept that measures how much each feature contributes to the prediction2. Vertex Explainable AI supports sampled Shapley explanations for tabular data, such as customer churn3.

Option C is incorrect because configuring integrated gradients explanations on Vertex Explainable AI is not suitable for explaining the difference between the actual prediction and the average prediction for a given input. Integrated gradients explanations are based on the idea of computing the gradients of the prediction with respect to the input features along a path from a baseline input to the actual input4. Vertex Explainable AI supports integrated gradients explanations for image and text data, but not for tabular data3.

Option D is incorrect because measuring the effect of each feature as the weight of the feature multiplied by the feature value is not a valid way to explain the difference between the actual prediction and the average prediction for a given input. This method assumes that the model is linear and additive, which is not the case for an ensemble of trees and neural networks. Moreover, this method does not account for the interactions between features or the non-linearity of the model5.

References:

Local surrogate models

Shapley value

Vertex Explainable AI overview

Integrated gradients

Feature importance