Winter Special Limited Time 65% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: bigdisc65

Pearson ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor New Attempt

Page: 7 / 20
Question 28

You are performing an ISMS audit at a residential nursing home (ABC) that provides healthcare services. The next

step in your audit plan is to verify the information security of ABC's healthcare mobile app development, support,

and lifecycle process. During the audit, you learned the organization outsourced the mobile app development to a

professional software development company with CMMI Level 5, ITSM (ISO/IEC 20000-1), BCMS (ISO 22301) and

ISMS (ISO/IEC 27001) certified.

The IT Manager presented the software security management procedure and summarised the process as following:

The mobile app development shall adopt "security-by-design" and "security-by-default" principles, as a minimum.

The following security functions for personal data protection shall be available:

Access control.

Personal data encryption, i.e., Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) algorithm, key lengths: 256 bits; and

Personal data pseudonymization.

Vulnerability checked and no security backdoor

You sample the latest Mobile App Test report, details as follows:

The IT Manager explains the test results should be approved by him according to the software security management procedure. The reason why the encryption and pseudonymisation functions failed is that these functions heavily slowed down the system and service performance. An extra 150% of resources are needed to cover this. The Service Manager agreed that access control is good enough and acceptable. That's why the Service Manager signed the approval.

You are preparing the audit findings. Select the correct option.

Options:

A.

There is a nonconformity (NC). The organisation and developer do not perform acceptance tests. (Relevant to clause 8.1, control A.8.29)

B.

There is a nonconformity (NC). The organisation and developer perform security tests that fail. (Relevant to clause 8.1, control A.8.29)

C.

There is a nonconformity (NC). The Service Manager does not comply with the software security management procedure. (Relevant to clause 8.1, control A.8.30)

D.

There is NO nonconformity (NC). The Service Manager makes a good decision to continue the service. (Relevant to clause 8.1, control A.8.30)

Question 29

Scenario 5: Data Grid Inc. is a well-known company that delivers security services across the entire information technology infrastructure. It provides cybersecurity software, including endpoint security, firewalls, and antivirus software. For two decades, Data Grid Inc. has helped various companies secure their networks through advanced products and services. Having achieved reputation in the information and network security field, Data Grid Inc. decided to obtain the ISO/IEC 27001 certification to better secure its internal and customer assets and gain competitive advantage.

Data Grid Inc. appointed the audit team, who agreed on the terms of the audit mandate. In addition, Data Grid Inc. defined the audit scope, specified the audit criteria, and proposed to close the audit within five days. The audit team rejected Data Grid Inc.'s proposal to conduct the audit within five days, since the company has a large number of employees and complex processes. Data Grid Inc. insisted that they have planned to complete the audit within five days, so both parties agreed upon conducting the audit within the defined duration. The audit team followed a risk-based auditing approach.

To gain an overview of the main business processes and controls, the audit team accessed process descriptions and organizational charts. They were unable to perform a deeper analysis of the IT risks and controls because their access to the IT infrastructure and applications was restricted. However, the audit team stated that the risk that a significant defect could occur to Data Grid Inc.'s ISMS was low since most of the company's processes were automated. They therefore evaluated that the ISMS, as a whole, conforms to the standard requirements by asking the representatives of Data Grid Inc. the following questions:

•How are responsibilities for IT and IT controls defined and assigned?

•How does Data Grid Inc. assess whether the controls have achieved the desired results?

•What controls does Data Grid Inc. have in place to protect the operating environment and data from malicious software?

•Are firewall-related controls implemented?

Data Grid Inc.'s representatives provided sufficient and appropriate evidence to address all these questions.

The audit team leader drafted the audit conclusions and reported them to Data Grid Inc.'s top management. Though Data Grid Inc. was recommended for certification by the auditors, misunderstandings were raised between Data Grid Inc. and the certification body in regards to audit objectives. Data Grid Inc. stated that even though the audit objectives included the identification of areas for potential improvement, the audit team did not provide such information.

Based on this scenario, answer the following question:

Based on scenario 5, the audit team disagreed with the proposed audit duration by Data Grid Inc. for the ISMS audit. How do you describe such a situation?

Options:

A.

Acceptable, auditors have the right to object, even refuse the audit mandate, if they deem that the audit duration is not sufficient

B.

Unacceptable, the audit duration is defined by the auditee and cannot be changed by the auditors

C.

Unacceptable, once the audit mandate is accepted, the audit duration cannot be changed

Question 30

What is the difference between a restricted and confidential document?

Options:

A.

Restricted - to be shared among an authorized group

Confidential - to be shared among named individuals

B.

Restricted - to be shared among named individuals 

Confidential - to be shared among an authorized group

C.

Restricted - to be shared among named individuals 

Confidential - to be shared across the organization only

D.

Restricted - to be shared among named individuals 

Confidential - to be shared with friends and family

Question 31

An audit finding is the result of the evaluation of the collected audit evidence against audit criteria. Evaluate the following potential formats of audit evidence and select the two that are acceptable.

Options:

A.

Unsigned hand written changes to test results

B.

Statement of facts by the IT manager

C.

Documented information on results of IT audits

D.

Statements by a system engineer that cannot be verified

E.

Observation of a previously recorded video demonstrating the performance of a hazardous activity

F.

An audio recording of a dialog between the IT manager and a system engineer

Page: 7 / 20
Exam Name: PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 2022 Lead Auditor exam
Last Update: Nov 5, 2024
Questions: 289
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor pdf

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor PDF

$28  $80
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Engine

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Testing Engine

$33.25  $95
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor PDF + Engine

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor PDF + Testing Engine

$45.5  $130