Authentic SAP Certification Exam C_SEC_2405 Questions Answers

SAP-developed roles in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition follow specific rules to ensure standardized and secure access management. Role maintenance reads applications from a catalog, meaning that roles are built by incorporating apps and tiles from predefined business catalogs, which group related functionalities. Authorization defaults define role authorizations, as SAP provides default authorization values for applications within these catalogs, ensuring consistent and secure permission assignments. Additionally, catalogs are assigned to role menus, allowing roles to include entire sets of applications and their associated authorizations, streamlining role configuration. Manual role authorizations in custom catalogs (option C) are not supported for SAP-developed roles, as these rely on predefined configurations. Role maintenance does not read applications from role menus (option B), as menus are an output of the catalog assignment process. These rules ensure that SAP-developed roles are efficient, secure, and aligned with business processes, providing a robust framework for access control in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition.

Composite roles in SAP systems group multiple single roles to simplify user assignment, but they have notable disadvantages. One disadvantage is that changes to the included single roles, such as adding or removing transactions, are not immediately visible in the composite role’s menu, requiring a renewed import to update the composite role’s structure. This delay can lead to inconsistencies during role maintenance, complicating administration. Another disadvantage is that changes to authorizations within a composite role can only be made through the included single roles, as composite roles do not allow direct authorization maintenance. This restriction limits flexibility and requires administrators to modify each single role individually, increasing effort and potential for errors. Menus from included roles can be mixed in the composite role, making option B incorrect, and deleting transactions from the composite role menu does not affect the included roles, ruling out option D. These limitations highlight the need for careful planning when using composite roles to ensure efficient and secure role management.

The Modification Comparison using transaction SU25 is a critical step after an SAP S/4HANA on-premise system upgrade. It compares custom changes made to the SAP default authorization data stored in tables USOBX (Check Indicators) and USOBT (Authorization Objects) with the new SAP default values provided in the upgraded release. This process identifies discrepancies between your customized settings and the new standards, allowing you to review and adjust authorizations to align with the updated system requirements. By doing so, it ensures that role maintenance remains consistent and secure, preventing potential authorization issues. The comparison does not involve USOBX_C or USOBT_C, which are customer-specific tables, nor does it directly write new default values or compare role maintenance data across releases.