Online Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer Questions Video

The best option to ensure that the features with the largest magnitude don’t overfit the model is to normalize the data by scaling it to have values between 0 and 1. This is also known as min-max scaling or feature scaling, and it can reduce the variance and skewness of the data, as well as improve the numerical stability and convergence of the model. Normalizing the data can also make the model less sensitive to the scale of the features, and more focused on the relative importance of each feature. Normalizing the data can be done using various methods, such as dividing each value by the maximum value, subtracting the minimum value and dividing by the range, or using the sklearn.preprocessing.MinMaxScaler function in Python.

The other options are not optimal for the following reasons:

• A. Standardizing the data by transforming it with a logarithmic function is not a good option, as it can distort the distribution and relationship of the data, and introduce bias and errors. Moreover, the logarithmic function is not defined for negative or zero values, which can limit its applicability and cause problems for the model.
• B. Applying a principal component analysis (PCA) to minimize the effect of any particular feature is not a good option, as it can reduce the interpretability and explainability of the data and the model. PCA is a dimensionality reduction technique that transforms the data into a new set of orthogonal features that capture the most variance in the data. However, these new features are not directly related to the original features, and can lose some information and meaning in the process. Moreover, PCA can be computationally expensive and complex, and may not be necessary for the problem at hand.
• C. Using a binning strategy to replace the magnitude of each feature with the appropriate bin number is not a good option, as it can lose the granularity and precision of the data, and introduce noise and outliers. Binning is a discretization technique that groups the continuous values of a feature into a finite number of bins or categories. However, this can reduce the variability and diversity of the data, and create artificial boundaries and gaps that may not reflect the true nature of the data. Moreover, binning can be arbitrary and subjective, and depend on the choice of the bin size and number.

References:

• Professional ML Engineer Exam Guide
• Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer Professional Certificate
• Google Cloud launches machine learning engineer certification
• Feature Scaling for Machine Learning: Understanding the Difference Between Normalization vs. Standardization
• sklearn.preprocessing.MinMaxScaler documentation
• Principal Component Analysis Explained Visually
• Binning Data in Python

• Option A is correct because using local feature importance from the predictions is the best way to provide the reasons that contributed to the model’s decision for a specific customer’s loan request. Local feature importance is a measure of how much each feature affects the prediction for a given instance, relative to the average prediction for the dataset1. AutoML Tables provides local feature importance values for each prediction, which can be accessed using the Vertex AI SDK for Python or the Cloud Console2. By using local feature importance, you can explain why the model rejected the loan request based on the customer’s data.
• Option B is incorrect because using the correlation with target values in the data summary page is not a good way to provide the reasons that contributed to the model’s decision for a specific customer’s loan request. The correlation with target values is a measure of how much each feature is linearly related to the target variable for the entire dataset, not for a single instance3. The data summary page in AutoML Tables shows the correlation with target values for each feature, as well as other statistics such as mean, standard deviation, and histogram4. However, these statistics are not useful for explaining the model’s decision for a specific customer, as they do not account for the interactions between features or the non-linearity of the model.
• Option C is incorrect because using the feature importance percentages in the model evaluation page is not a good way to provide the reasons that contributed to the model’s decision for a specific customer’s loan request. The feature importance percentages are a measure of how much each feature affects the overall accuracy of the model for the entire dataset, not for a single instance5. The model evaluation page in AutoML Tables shows the feature importance percentages for each feature, as well as other metrics such as precision, recall, and confusion matrix. However, these metrics are not useful for explaining the model’s decision for a specific customer, as they do not reflect the individual contribution of each feature for a given prediction.
• Option D is incorrect because varying features independently to identify the threshold per feature that changes the classification is not a feasible way to provide the reasons that contributed to the model’s decision for a specific customer’s loan request. This method involves changing the value of one feature at a time, while keeping the other features constant, and observing how the prediction changes. However, this method is not practical, as it requires making multiple prediction requests, and may not capture the interactions between features or the non-linearity of the model.

References:

• Local feature importance
• Getting local feature importance values
• Correlation with target values
• Data summary page
• Feature importance percentages
• [Model evaluation page]
• [Varying features independently]

• Option A is incorrect because using AI Platform notebooks to perform a Lasso regression analysis on your model, which will eliminate features that do not provide a strong signal, is not a suitable way to determine which customer attribute has the most predictive power for each prediction served by the model. Lasso regression is a method of feature selection that applies a penalty to the coefficients of the linear model, and shrinks them to zero for irrelevant features1. However, this method assumes that the model is linear and additive, which may not be the case for a TensorFlow model. Moreover, this method does not provide feature attributions for each prediction, but rather for the entire dataset.
• Option B is incorrect because streaming prediction results to BigQuery, and using BigQuery’s CORR(X1, X2) function to calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient between each feature and the target variable, is not a valid way to determine which customer attribute has the most predictive power for each prediction served by the model. The Pearson correlation coefficient is a measure of the linear relationship between two variables, ranging from -1 to 12. However, this method does not account for the interactions between features or the non-linearity of the model. Moreover, this method does not provide feature attributions for each prediction, but rather for the entire dataset.
• Option C is correct because using the AI Explanations feature on AI Platform, and submitting each prediction request with the ‘explain’ keyword to retrieve feature attributions using the sampled Shapley method, is the best way to determine which customer attribute has the most predictive power for each prediction served by the model. AI Explanations is a service that allows you to get feature attributions for your deployed models on AI Platform3. Feature attributions are values that indicate how much each feature contributed to the prediction for a given instance4. The sampled Shapley method is a technique that uses the Shapley value, a game-theoretic concept, to measure the contribution of each feature to the prediction5. By using AI Explanations, you can get feature attributions for each prediction request, and identify the most important features for each customer.
• Option D is incorrect because using the What-If tool in Google Cloud to determine how your model will perform when individual features are excluded, and ranking the feature importance in order of those that caused the most significant performance drop when removed from the model, is not a practical way to determine which customer attribute has the most predictive power for each prediction served by the model. The What-If tool is a tool that allows you to visualize and analyze your ML models and datasets. However, this method requires manually editing or removing features for each instance, and observing the change in the prediction. This method is not scalable or efficient, and may not capture the interactions between features or the non-linearity of the model.

References:

• Lasso regression
• Pearson correlation coefficient
• AI Explanations overview
• Feature attributions
• Sampled Shapley method
• [What-If tool overview]

A random forest is an ensemble learning method that consists of many decision trees. It can be used for both regression and classification tasks. A random forest classification model can predict the probability of churn for each customer by assigning them to different classes, such as high-risk, medium-risk, or low-risk. A random forest model can also generate feature importances, which measure how much each feature contributes to the prediction. Feature importances can help interpret the model and understand what factors influence customer churn. Vertex AI Workbench is an integrated development environment (IDE) that allows you to create and run Jupyter notebooks on Google Cloud. You can use Vertex AI Workbench to build a random forest classification model in Python, using libraries such as scikit-learn or TensorFlow. You can also configure the model to generate feature importances after the model is trained, and visualize them using plots or tables. This solution can help you build an interpretable model for customer churn prediction, and use the results to design marketing campaigns that target at-risk customers. References:

• Random Forests | scikit-learn
• Vertex AI Workbench | Google Cloud
• Interpreting Random Forests | Towards Data Science