Authentic Salesforce Certification Exam Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect Questions Answers

 Generating a code review checklist to ensure consistency between reviews and different reviewers and conducting a review that combines human efforts and automatic checks by the tool to detect all flaws are two recommended practices to follow when conducting secure code reviews, as they can help improve the quality and security of the code and reduce the risk of vulnerabilities or errors. Focusing on the aggregated reviews to save time and effort, to remove the need to continuously monitor each meaningful change is not a good practice, as it can miss important details or changes that can affect the code functionality or security. Using the code review software as the tool to flag which developer has committed the errors, so the developer can improve is not a constructive way of conducting code reviews, as it can create a blame culture and discourage collaboration and learning. See Secure Coding Guidelines for more details.

The best practice is to always fix the bug in the developer environment where the project work was done, and follow the normal deployment and testing process. This ensures that the code is consistent, traceable, and validated across all environments. Fixing the bug in UAT is not ideal, as it can introduce new issues, create conflicts with other changes, and bypass the version control system. Spinning up a new sandbox for a hot fix is not necessary, as it can add complexity and overhead to the deployment process. Treating the issue as a change request and putting it in the backlog is not advisable, as it can delay the resolution and affect the user experience.

Facilitating the design of a prioritization model with the stakeholders is the best way to overcome the problem of having many backlog items and competing stakeholders who cannot agree on priority. A prioritization model is a framework that helps the stakeholders evaluate and rank the backlog items based on various criteria, such as value, urgency, effort, risk, etc. By using a prioritization model, the stakeholders can have a clear and objective way of deciding which items are more important and should be done first. Organizing a sprint planning meeting, taking over prioritization, or allowing the delivery teams to pick the work are not effective solutions, as they do not address the root cause of the problem or involve the stakeholders in the decision-making process.