Legit 1z0-1084-24 Exam Download

Explanation

The correct answer is: "Once rotated, older key versions can be used for encryption until they are deleted." The statement that is NOT valid about rotating keys in the OCI Vault service is: "Once rotated, older key versions can be used for encryption until they are deleted." In the OCI Vault service, when you rotate a master encryption key (MEK), a new key version is automatically generated. However, once a key is rotated and a new version is created, the older key versions are no longer usable for encryption. The purpose of key rotation is to ensure that the encryption keys are regularly updated and that older keys are no longer used to protect sensitive data. This enhances security by minimizing the impact of potential key compromises. The other statements mentioned are valid: Both software and hardware security module (HSM)-protected MEKs can be rotated. This provides flexibility in choosing the type of MEK and ensures that key rotation can be performed regardless of the encryption method used. Each key version is tracked internally with separate unique OCIDs (Oracle Cloud Identifiers). This allows for easy management and tracking of different key versions within the OCI Vault service. In summary, the statement that is NOT valid is the one suggesting that older key versions can still be used for encryption until they are deleted. Key rotation is designed to ensure the use of the latest key version and to retire older key versions to enhance security.

Explanation

The valid OKE cluster network configuration that meets the requirement of having the least attack surface while still allowing direct access to the deployed applications from the Internet is: Private subnets for nodes and the Kubernetes API endpoint; public subnets for load balancers. By placing the nodes and the Kubernetes API endpoint in private subnets, they are not directly accessible from the Internet, reducing the attack surface. The load balancers, on the other hand, are placed in public subnets, allowing them to be accessed from the Internet and serve as the entry point for accessing the deployed applications. This configuration ensures that the critical components of the cluster, such as the nodes and the API endpoint, are protected within the private network, while still providing accessibility to the applications through the load balancers. It helps to enhance security by limiting direct access to the internal components of the cluster while maintaining the availability of the deployed applications.

Explanation

The two "Action Type" options that are NOT available in an Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Events rule definition are: Email (Correct) Slack (Correct) The available "Action Type" options in OCI Events rule definition include Functions, Notifications, and Streaming. However, email and Slack are not directly supported as action types in OCI Events. Instead, you can use Notifications to send notifications to various notification channels, including email and Slack, through the OCI Notifications service.

Explanation

The correct answer in this scenario is to use the OCI API Gateway service and configure rate limiting. Using the OCI API Gateway service and configuring rate limiting is an effective approach to address Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks. By implementing rate limiting, you can control the number of requests that can be made to your web service within a specific time frame. This helps to prevent overload and ensures that your service can handle legitimate traffic while mitigating the impact of DDoS attacks. By leveraging the OCI API Gateway service, you can easily configure rate limiting rules to restrict the number of requests per second or per minute. This allows you to set appropriate thresholds and safeguard your web service from being overwhelmed by excessive requests. The API Gateway acts as a protective layer, filtering out malicious traffic and ensuring the smooth operation of your service. While options like OCI Virtual Cloud Network (VCN) segregation and third-party service integrations may contribute to overall security, they do not specifically address DDoS attacks as efficiently as rate limiting. VCN segregation focuses more on network segmentation and isolation, while third-party service integration may introduce additional dependencies and complexities. Re-writing your web service and implementing rate limiting is a viable option, but it may not be feasible considering the time constraints mentioned. Leveraging the OCI API Gateway service provides a quicker and easier solution to implement DDoS attack mitigation through rate limiting.