Last Attempt PT0-002 Questions

IoT devices are often shipped with default passwords, which are easily discoverable and widely known. Many users fail to change these default credentials, leaving the devices vulnerable to unauthorized access. This issue is one of the most common vulnerabilities associated with IoT devices connected directly to the internet. Attackers can exploit these default passwords to gain control over the devices, potentially leading to a range of malicious activities, including the recruitment of the devices into botnets for Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, data breaches, or other cybercriminal activities.

The payload file=/proc/self/environ is used to exploit Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerabilities in web applications running on Linux systems. This payload allows the attacker to read the environment variables of the process running the web server, which can include sensitive information such as credentials, system paths, and configuration details. The other payloads mentioned are not as directly relevant to obtaining running process credentials in the context of an LFI vulnerability.

Crawling URIs using an interception proxy is the best active reconnaissance technique for gathering additional information about a web application. An interception proxy, such as Burp Suite or OWASP ZAP, allows the penetration tester to see and manipulate the requests and responses between the client and the server, providing detailed insights into the application's behavior, structure, and vulnerabilities. This technique is more comprehensive and controlled compared to using cURL or a web browser.

References:

OWASP Testing Guide: Web Application Security Testing

Burp Suite Documentation

OWASP ZAP User Guide

Upon discovering passwords in a publicly available data breach during the reconnaissance phase, the most ethical and constructive action for the penetration tester is to contact the client and inform them of the breach. This approach allows the client to take necessary actions to mitigate any potential risks, such as forcing password resets or enhancing their security measures. Adding the passwords to a report appendix (option A) without context or action could be seen as irresponsible, while doing nothing (option B) neglects the tester's duty to inform the client of potential threats. Using the passwords in a credential stuffing attack (option D) without explicit permission as part of an agreed testing scope would be unethical and potentially illegal.