CompTIA PT0-002 Actual Questions

When a penetration tester obtains a list of password digests using Responder, the next logical step is to attempt to crack these password hashes to retrieve the plaintext passwords. Hashcat is one of the most widely used tools for this purpose. It is a high-performance password recovery tool that supports a wide range of hashing algorithms and can utilize the power of GPU acceleration to significantly speed up the cracking process.

Hashcat is preferred over tools like Hydra, CeWL, and Medusa in this context because it is specifically designed for cracking password hashes rather than brute-forcing login credentials (Hydra, Medusa) or generating custom wordlists (CeWL).

References:

Hashcat official website: Hashcat

Usage examples in various penetration testing reports, including those involving password cracking and hash manipulation​​​​.

The payload used by the penetration tester is a type of blind SQL injection attack that delays the response of the database by 15 seconds if the condition is true. This can be used to extract information from the database by asking a series of true or false questions. To prevent this type of attack, the best practice is to use parameterized queries, which separate the user input from the SQL statement and prevent the injection of malicious code. Encrypting passwords, encoding output, and sanitizing HTML are also good security measures, but they do not directly address the SQL injection vulnerability. References:

The Official CompTIA PenTest+ Study Guide (Exam PT0-002), Chapter 5: Attacks and Exploits, Section 5.2: Perform Network Attacks, Subsection: SQL Injection, p. 235-237

Blind SQL Injection | OWASP Foundation, Description and Examples sections

Time-Based Blind SQL Injection Attacks, Introduction and Microsoft SQL Server sections

 Deauthentication attacks can force legitimate users to disconnect from a wireless network, prompting them to reconnect and, in the process, capture valid user credentials using a rogue access point or network monitoring tools.

 Details:

A. Wardriving: Involves driving around to discover wireless networks; it does not directly gather user credentials.

B. Captive portal: Requires users to log in but is not an attack method; it is a legitimate method to control network access.

C. Deauthentication: Forces users to reauthenticate, allowing an attacker to capture credentials during the reconnection process.

D. Impersonation: Involves pretending to be someone else to gain access but is less effective for directly capturing user credentials compared to deauthentication.

 References: Deauthentication attacks are well-documented in wireless security assessments and penetration testing guides.