Certified-Strategy-Designer Exam Results

The methodology that should be used to resolve conflicts and promote consensus among different business units is a prioritization matrix. A prioritization matrix is a tool to evaluate and compare requirements based on two or more criteria, such as impact, effort, urgency, or importance. Requirements that score high on the chosen criteria are usually prioritized, while requirements that score low are usually deprioritized or eliminated. A prioritization matrix can help different business units reach a common understanding and agreement on the most critical and valuable requirements for the key use cases. A journey map or a SWOT analysis may not be effective for resolving conflicts or promoting consensus, as they do not provide a clear and objective way to rank requirements.

A challenge statement should define the problem space without suggesting specific solutions, to encourage creative and open-ended ideation. Suggesting solutions within the statement can limit thinking and prevent the exploration of diverse and innovative ideas.

The question that the team should use to prioritize and turn insights into design opportunities is “Why is this insight valuable?” This question can help the team evaluate the relevance, significance, and impact of each insight, and how it relates to the user needs, pain points, goals, and motivations. The question also helps the team frame the insights in terms of benefits and outcomes, rather than features or solutions. The other questions may be useful for assessing feasibility or viability, but they do not prioritize insights based on value.

A well-written challenge statement should clearly define the target user or persona to ensure the design solutions are tailored to their specific needs and contexts. Including the persona in the challenge statement focuses the team's efforts on creating solutions that are relevant and impactful for the intended audience.