CCNP Security 350-701 Full Course Free

ExplanationExplanationEndpoint protection platforms (EPP) prevent endpoint security threats like known and unknown malware.Endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions can detect and respond to threats that your EPP and other security tools did not catch.EDR and EPP have similar goals but are designed to fulfill different purposes. EPP is designed to providedevice-level protection by identifying malicious files, detecting potentially malicious activity, and providing tools for incident investigation and response.The preventative nature of EPP complements proactive EDR. EPP acts as the first line of defense, filtering out attacks that can be detected by the organization’s deployed security solutions. EDR acts as a second layer of protection, enabling security analysts to perform threat hunting and identify more subtle threats to the endpoint.Effective endpoint defense requires a solution that integrates the capabilities of both EDR and EPP to provide protection against cyber threats without overwhelming an organization’s security team.

Cisco AMP for Endpoints is a cloud-based endpoint security solution that provides advanced malware protection, threat detection and response, and endpoint isolation. It protects endpoint systems through application control and real-time scanning, which are two of its multifaceted prevention techniques. Application control allows administrators to define and enforce policies on which applications can run on the endpoints, while real-time scanning continuously monitors files and processes for malicious activity. These features help stop threats from compromising the endpoints and reduce the attack surface. Cisco Secure Endpoint (Formerly AMP for Endpoints) - CiscoMalware Protection - Cisco AMP Advanced Malware Protection References:

• Cisco Secure Endpoint (Formerly AMP for Endpoints) - Cisco
• Malware Protection - Cisco AMP Advanced Malware Protection
• Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies (SCOR) v1.0, Module 3: Endpoint Protection and Detection, Lesson 3.1: Cisco AMP for Endpoints, Topic 3.1.1: Introduction to Cisco AMP for Endpoints
• Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies (SCOR) v1.0, Module 3: Endpoint Protection and Detection, Lesson 3.1: Cisco AMP for Endpoints, Topic 3.1.2: Cisco AMP for Endpoints Architecture
• Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies (SCOR) v1.0, Module 3: Endpoint Protection and Detection, Lesson 3.1: Cisco AMP for Endpoints, Topic 3.1.3: Cisco AMP for Endpoints Features

The Cisco ASA and the Cisco IOS router with Zone-Based Policy Firewall (ZFW) have different default behaviors when it comes to traffic filtering. The Cisco ASA follows a default deny-all policy that prohibits traffic between firewall security zones until an explicit policy is applied to allow desirable traffic1. The Cisco IOS router with ZFW, on the other hand, starts out by allowing all traffic, even on untrusted interfaces, until a zone-pair policy is applied to restrict or inspect traffic2. This means that the Cisco ASA provides a higher level of security by default, while the Cisco IOS router with ZFW requires more configuration to harden the router. However, the Cisco IOS router with ZFW also offers more flexibility and granularity in defining firewall policies, as well as more advanced features such as DMVPN, GET VPN, and Policy-Based Routing, which are not supported by the Cisco ASA23. References:

• 2: IOS Firewall vs. ASA - Cisco Community
• 1: Understand the Zone-Based Policy Firewall Design - Cisco
• 4: What is a functional difference between a Cisco ASA and a Cisco IOS router with Zone-based policy firewall?
• 5: What is a functional difference between a Cisco ASA and Cisco IOS router with Zone-based policy firewall?
• 3: Cisco Zone-Based Firewall Reporting – Plixer

ExplanationExplanationEach rule also has an action, which determines whether you monitor, trust, block, or allow matching traffic.Note: With action “trust”, Firepower does not do any more inspection on the traffic. There will be no intrusion protection and also no file-policy on this traffic.